View Single Post
      11-01-2011, 07:27 PM   #5
remmib
General
remmib's Avatar
Norway
363
Rep
26,345
Posts

Drives: 2013 F10 520d M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golpesar View Post
Thank you for all of your responses
I have done lots of research and honestly only hesitation as is based on which one would give better dry and wet breaking as remmib mentioned.
Sadly Continentals are sold out all over the city so pretty much only choice is Nokians, they are R rated which 170 Km/h and they come in 91 R and 94 R? 94 R is cheaper by 50 dollars per tire, what are the advantages/disadvantages of going with 94 vs 91?

Cheers
The 91 and 94 are the load index, and the e9x can use both.
I assume the 94 has a stiffer sidewall to support extra load, but that's just my assumption, and I don't know how big of a difference there may be.
__________________

F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3D Design Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals |