View Single Post
      06-07-2012, 03:36 PM   #61
themyst
Major General
 
themyst's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 335i LCI
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NYC

Posts: 6,599
iTrader: (8)

Send a message via AIM to themyst
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
If a user or a vendor makes a technically misleading statement, it's understandable to ask them for clarification. This is not to incite anything other than an exchange of information.

Also, I've witness first hand the effects of the original CPS box. As have others on this forum. I hope BMS has brushed up on their engine tuning theory since then.
When it comes to subtracting timing the net result is the same as a procede user tinkering with ignition correction, as far as I can recall, = 1 degree of offset for every 25%.

When you reduce timing and not ride the knock sensor, you lose power but gain consistency. Proactive versus reactive. We all get that.

So can you kindly explain what you experienced first hand with BMS CPS implementation? Works great for me with RBs.
__________________
E90 LCI N54 6AT
themyst is offline   South Korea
0
Reply With Quote