Originally Posted by skinrock
I'm personally not a fan of saying "A beat B, B beat C, therefore A should walk C", too many factors. He was actually a little ahead at the start, and you can easily tell how I'm losing at the shifting. Like I said, still happy.
Either im having some creepy deja vu, or ive heard that exact statement before very recently? oh well there are a ton a variables so thats a reasonable statement