View Single Post
      05-13-2009, 11:08 AM   #29
UncleWede
Long Time Admirer, First Time Owner
UncleWede's Avatar
United_States
51
Rep
2,376
Posts

 
Drives: E90 325i Arctic
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oxnard, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by radix View Post
The premise is simple, replace uranium with a fissionable material with a much greater atomic mass and you get a bigger boom. My point was that a very small amount of material can produce a "big boom", thus to assume that a large amount of "red matter" would be required is faulty reasoning. That wouldn't account for the creation of a black hole though I guess, but that wasn't the point of my post.
Yes, but using E=MC2, to produce enough E to implode the planet would require M to be HEEEEE-UGGGGEEEEE, so you wouldn't be walking around with it in your hands, you'd never be able to carry it. Carrying it in a syringe was the point of my post.