View Single Post
      07-27-2009, 09:05 PM   #80
Major General
scalbert's Avatar

Drives: '13 S4, '15 Q7
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Woodstock, GA

iTrader: (8)

Originally Posted by View Post
Anyway the net result is that 0% CPS offset resulted in 3.43 degrees average timing advance, while 100% CPS offset resulted in 3.49 degrees average timing advance. Hardly any difference at all.
Did you use an non-standard Zip program as it is coming back corrupt?

Anyway, since you do not have Rev II I would assume that these are BT logs. As such, the compensation for CPS offsetting is not applied so the 100% CF would have run less timing, once the offsetting values would be applied which the BT tool knows nothing about, thus countering your claim.

And just for SaG, were both runs adapted?