View Single Post
      11-16-2009, 03:30 PM   #44

Drives: 335ix
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Originally Posted by 742 View Post
"Now, let me begin by describing the situation I found when I was inaugurated on January 20...
I can't believe you are using this as an example as Nixon, in this speech, did the exact opposite of what Obama is doing. The speech goes on to say:

In view of these circumstances there were some who urged that I end the war at once by ordering the immediate withdrawal of all American forces.
From a political standpoint this would have been a popular and easy course to follow. After all, we became involved in the war while my predecessor was in office. I could blame the defeat which would be the result of my action on him and come out as the peacemaker. Some put it to me quite bluntly: This was the only way to avoid allowing Johnson's war to become Nixon's war.
But I had a greater obligation than to think only of the years of my administration and of the next election. I had to think of the effect of my decision on the next generation and on the future of peace and freedom in America and in the world.
Let us all understand that the question before us is not whether some Americans are for peace and some Americans are against peace. The question at issue is not whether Johnson's war becomes Nixon's war.
The great question is: How can we win America's peace?

He takes ownership of the war.

He rejects the idea that it is still LBJ's war.

Last edited by shpirate87; 11-16-2009 at 03:57 PM.