View Single Post
      01-28-2007, 12:24 PM   #19
red-max
First Lieutenant
 
red-max's Avatar
 
Drives: 520d M-Sport Auto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK

Posts: 360
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by beauforty View Post
My view with both the E90 and E92 are the wheels and tyres make the biggest visual difference. You put the 320d on 19's with 255's at the rear and it will look so much sportier. The 320d above I agree looks unflattering.
Yes I agree, the wheels make a huge difference, and IMHO it's the wheels that don't look right on this M-Sport Coupe. Strange, because the same style looks good on the M-Sports saloon. I think the Coupe needs wheels with more of a "dished" look to them, and somehow those in the picture look "flat" to me.

I think I actually prefer the look of the 18" 189 style wheels, which is just as well because that's what I've got on my car, and the 19" 230's look wicked too. I was quite worried that when the M-Sport came out, I was going to wish I'd waited, but actually I'm quite pleased with my 335d SE - no expensive bodykit upgrade required (phew).

Quote:
Originally Posted by beauforty View Post
I think it also need to be lowered, there's too much space in the wheel arch. I lowered car looks so much sportier
Don't the M-Sport models all come with M-Sport lowered and stiffened suspension?
__________________
2012 F10 520d M-Sport, Sport Auto, Imperial Blue, Black Dakota, Sun Prot Glass. V-spoke 281 Winter wheel package
Previous BMWs: 2009 E92 320d M-Sport, 2006 E92 335d SE, 2004 E60 530d ASE, 2000 E39 525d SE, 1997 E39 523i SE
red-max is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote