Quote:
Originally Posted by rsmallwo
Didn't spot the resembalance. but now you mention it, spot on!!
Me being a labour man I was disappointed by Ed over David. David clearly looks and feels like a statesman who seems to know what he's talking about. Ed looks like a teenager in comparison. I don't base my political leadership descisions based on looks but alot of people do and this isn't going to help the labour party.
I'm sure all you "blues" where delighted that our "reds" future captain has been displaced by the tea boy.
I'm not going to completely dismiss Ed, but would have really prefered David. Totally agree with what he "mouthed" to Harriot Harman about people voting for the Iraq war and yet clapping when Ed says it was wrong...in future, think about voting for stuff before voting for it.
|
surely if they voted for the best looking one gordy wouldnt have stood a dogs chance. as for thinking about what they are voting for surely this is not allowed in the labour party. no thinking about it they cant cast their votes on looks, neil kinnock, michael foot, defininately not.