Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com
Please keep in mind the refutal of CPS as being "not learned out" is proven in the logs posted as "Test 1" and "Test 2", which demonstrates that at 100% of programmed CPS offset the system was unable to prevent the ECU from upwardly adjusting timing at 5000 rpm.
|
Are we looking at the same charts? The below are approximates when looking at the plots as I do not have the raw data.
Test 1
RPM - DME Advance
5000 - 9.5
5500 - 8.5
6000 - 10.0
6500 - 12.0
Test 2
RPM - DME Advance
5000 - 5.5
5500 - 7.0
6000 - 9.5
6500 - 10.5
Your statement appears to suggest that the removed timing was added back in by the DME. But that would mean Test 2 would show more advance at the same RPM. But it was less, probably due to difference in temperatures as well as acceleration rates. Even Test 4 showed similar numbers.
What am I missing with what you are saying?
BTW, better tell AMS they are heading down a wrong way street as well.
