Quote:
Originally Posted by khaye1
i'm contemplating getting 70-200 f4L...the question is, is it worth getting the IS version? It's twice the price...not sure if I need IS at 200.
I'll mostly use this lens for wildlife, landscape and the occasional holiday trip to disneyland for their christmas parades.
I didn't want to create a new topic for this question so I figured I'll post it here.
edit: this will also be my very first L lens
|
I'll throw in my 2 cents here as well. Save for the IS. I rented the non-IS version and had trouble holding it still at 200mm. In less than bright sun, you'll struggle to get shutter times needed to freeze action and avoid camera shake blur. If you still can't decide, rent one. They're not pricey to rent.