Thread: KERS is a flop
View Single Post
      06-24-2009, 09:55 AM   #6
E90SLAM
Supreme Allied Commander
E90SLAM's Avatar
Hong Kong
1963
Rep
61,781
Posts

Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .

iTrader: (6)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by x838nwy View Post
Personally, I think Max Mosley on the whole has good intentions and good concepts. I just feel he lacks the technical knowledge/technical team to put his concepts into practice. Putting "green" tech into F1 is not such a terrible idea, but in the case of KERS, the technology is not ready for F1 and F1 isn't ready for it either.

It is inevitable that we will all be using one form of KERS or another in our cars soon. And perhaps motorsport does have some responsibility in being relevant to what we drive to work. But in our cars, we don't really mind the odd 20kg if it means we'll save a bit of cash at the pumps. And honestly, where you put that 20kg in a 1,700kg car is pretty immaterial (unless you put it on the roof or somthing silly). So, in a sense, a number of these "green" technologies are better developed in road cars rather than on the race track. In ~700kg F1 cars where 1 second covers like the first 8 places, things are less forgiving. Depending on the track and a whole bunch of other factors, getting the right weight distribution may get you more speed than having KERS - or at least KERS at its current level of development.

Another idiotic thing is the fact that they introduced slicks and a bunch of other changes to tyres and aero regs. at the same time as KERS. With these changes, teams must find a new optimum weight distribution for their cars to work properly so the importance of having weights at the right place(s) is amplified.

To get the technology in being almost usable (i.e. the advantages outweighs the disadvantages of having KERS) takes a great deal of money and to have F1 in a state where any radical technology can be effectively applied will take stability in the regulations. 2008/2009 had the money but not stability, 2009/2010 will, by the looks of things, have neither. So imo, things are not looking too good for trying to make F1 any "greener".

Mr.Mosley appears to be trying to make F1 more "relevant" and introduce more overtaking and I'm okay with all of that. What he needs is someone with a similar insight to F1 cars as Ross Brawn or Adrian Newey on board his team to get proper, workable and sustainable regulation in F1 while at the same time achieve those goals rather than just throwing out frankly crazy ideas.
I can't put any better....even tho I don't like Max Mosley...but he's the person who put Formula 1 into a safer race....especially after Senna's tragedy....he enforced regulations of cockpit safety and HANS...etc....

However, he has good intentions of all the things he proposed for 2010, however, its a piss poor execution that give everything mandatory immediately....for teams who's spending billions euros and being forced to cut down to 40 million a year is unrealistic....and sadly he refuse to work with FOTA with their "gradual budget cut"....so every team spend a bit less each year and achieve 40 million budget in 4 years or so....

and now his stepping down is to make sure Formula 1 doesn't fall apart and history book marks him as the person who destroyed Formula 1....
__________________
Appreciate 0