Quote:
Originally Posted by TTurboBullett
bigger timeslips
[IMG]  [/IMG] |
Well, see this is all a bit misleading; with the larger timeslips that you can actually see, it's obvious that the 113mph trap was with the horrible 2.4x 60ft. and 13.5x sec. ET.
The decent 12.8x sec. ET was with a 109.x mph trap speed and 1.9x sec. 60ft...all very good btw.
So, what's the moral of this experience...that higher octane race gas really does wonders for these cars?
