View Single Post
      03-30-2013, 08:01 PM   #20
OpenFlash
United_States
1737
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
During in-house testing, we have made well over 500whp on a mustang dyno with our single turbo cars on 91oct (no methanol). That's nearly 600whp on a Dynojet. The problem with running that much boost (24+psi) with such little ignition advance (2-6deg) is that exhaust gas temps get too hot for sustained racing conditions. Dyno glory runs are fine but we don't live on a dyno. These are some of the things you learn during the long term testing process because customers will put their car through things which are much more stressful than anything you can replicate on the dyno when trying to make glory numbers (hot lapping for instance). But if you are just after numbers to claim some sort of pump gas record, that's fine. But any experience tuner knows that you are just tuning poorly to impressed the uninformed masses. There is a reason why some beginner tuners go through turbos like rolls of toiler paper while others, with more experience (esp in motorsport) don't.

That said, we are always down for some friendly competition. But let's give the other team so more time to go through the testing/tuning phase. Because a lot will be learned in the process. And it will benefit everyone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric335 View Post
Given that Vargas hasnt had YEARS to tune and refine it.... Shit, im still going with Vargas, its just so much better of a kit.
Really? Why? Not trying to be argumentative because everyone is entitled to his opinion. But would like to hear your reasoning.

Last edited by OpenFlash; 03-30-2013 at 08:13 PM..
Appreciate 0