Quote:
Originally Posted by vachss
Adorama still has it for $1974 (but won't for long) if you're thinking about it:
http://www.adorama.com/CA702002ISU.html?emailprice=t
I may regret it, but I'm not not snapping one up. Though I'm sure the 70-200II is a great lens it just doesn't fit into my work flow. The shots I might want a 70-200 for just always seem better served by my 135L or 300/4. |
depends on your use of the 135L the 70-200 2.8II is a bucket load sharper.
I like the 135L a lot, but I only seem to use it when i'm planning to do a photoshoot with someone (which is rare)
But because I have 2 cameras, one of the 2 will always have the 70-200 2.8II on it, while I go back and forth between my 16-35L and my 24-70L depending what i'm doing for the most part.