|
JT, thanks for posting. I have the video ripped from my mini dv camera but I need to get that uploaded to youtube and I will see what I can figure out on the morning.
As for the results, they definitely have me scratching my head. The corrected numbers aside, the uncorrected HP seems to stand to reason for our test elevation of 5700 feet above sea level. The torque numbers, corrected & uncorrected, definitely have me confused as they are very high. Can't see how I would have 270ish at this altitude and 340ish at sea level.
I'm guessing those guys at MAC autosport have something interesting in the way that dyno produces its results. I know dynojets produce higher numbers but the torque numbers just seem a bit high???
Would like to have Shiv or anyone with dynojet experience to weigh in on this as I see from his posts that he has a dynojet and a good bit of experience in this dyno brand??
|