View Single Post
      03-12-2007, 11:07 PM   #19
musc
******
musc's Avatar
United_States
184
Rep
1,702
Posts

Drives: Audi TTRS, 335is
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SC

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2011 BMW 335is  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrM View Post
Nyulak, I think that you misunderstood what WilyB was saying. He is correct.

If you experience a 13% drive train loss and you know the crank horsepower of your car, you figure out the wheel horsepower rating like this:

400hp (at the crank) * (1-0.13) = 348 wheel horsepower.
so:
Crank_hp * (1 - loss%) = Wheel_hp

Since we use chassis dynos, we know the Wheel_hp instead of the Crank_hp. So, if you wanted to estimate the Crank_hp you would do this:

Crank_hp = Wheel_hp / (1 - loss%)

which is the same as

Crank_hp = Wheel_hp * 1 / (1 - loss%)

Given that BMW estimates a 13% drive train loss on the manual cars, this would be 1/(1-0.13) = 1.149425287

So, if you knew the Wheel_hp you could simply multiply the Wheel_hp by 1.149425287 to get the Crank_hp.

In the example above 348 whp * 1.15 = 400.2 ~= 400 crank_hp

WilyB simply rounded this to 1.15. It is simply coincidence that it happens to be the value that BMW estimates as the drive train percentage loss for the automatic.
Those formulas work OK initially for a rough estiamte, but I hate when they are applied to a modified car. The driveline loss stays constant unless you change something in the driveline. It just boggles my mind when tuners claim 800+hp kits for a car putting 6xx hp to the wheels because they are applying that same percentage loss.
Appreciate 0