View Single Post
      11-22-2013, 06:19 PM   #593
dcaron9999
Major
dcaron9999's Avatar
Canada
155
Rep
1,409
Posts

Drives: 2011 135i M package
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mirabel, Quebec

iTrader: (0)

Tried the new V2.00 maps on my N55 135i a couple of minutes ago. Pulled a few WOT 3rd gear logs, and here is the best one I got with "Stage 1 + FMIC Agressive" map, with zero bolt-ons and outside air temperature just at the freezing mark (32F/0C):

If the graph from virtual dyno is acurate, I made 355WHP and 373lb-ft of torque, but notice how the bosst is slightly irregular.

I scrolled through the CSV file, and turbo boost reaches 11.2 PSI from 2500 to 5000 RPM, with the V2.00 map (1st graph). With the V1.00 map, I reached 12.5 PSI, but produced less HP + torque (2nd graph), weather was a couple of degrees warmer if I recall. Is this normal behavior?

v2.00 stage 1 + FMIC aggressive map


v1.00 stage 1 + FMIC aggressive map


v2.00 (blue) versus v1.00 (red) stage 1 + FMIC aggressive maps
__________________
2011 X3 35i with M pack + 2011 135i w/6SPMT | 255 square tire setup | Quaife 3.46 LSD | Diff lock down bracket | Bilstein B8+Swift SpecR springs+H&R FSB | CDV delete | BMS Oil Tstat bypass | ER FMIC & CP | N54Tuning DP | GC Street Camber Plates | M3 FCA +guide rods+RSFB's+Tranny mounts | Manzo toe arms | Cobb Stg2 agressive tune | Hawk DTC70 brake pads | RB SS brake pistons | Goodridge SS brake lines | Custom brake cooling ducts

Last edited by dcaron9999; 11-23-2013 at 08:43 AM..
Appreciate 0