Quote:
Originally Posted by quattrogmbh
Paying the funds back "After the Fact" is actually constituted as an admission of guilt. If this does go as far as a court of law, I would expect the court to judge "errors and ommisions" corrected prior to the publication of the statement of fact as acceptable and dilligent. Anything paid back after the publication solely as an admission of guilt or financial negligence. This is the same offence that the courts are hoping to charge finance industry leaders with. Those cases would set very nice precedent :-)
|
But when you submit a document of expenses incurred during your employment and sign it as checked and correct that doesn't mean 'errors and omissions!! You cannot then pay up £16,000 for a mortgage that hasn't existed for three years as an error. Sorry that is fraud. Even if this is paid before the Telegraph outs you that is not acceptable. If the noose was not being tightened by this expose we would as tax payers be stumping up millions of our hard earned to supplement peoples homes and lifestyles.