FORUMS
- 5
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Ncap Results
|
![]() |
| 05-31-2007, 03:45 PM | #1 |
|
The Tarmac Terrorist
Drives: E46 M3 Tiag/Imola Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Ncap Results
i know the e90 scored 5 star but what did the e92 get?
also i have heard the e93 is dire for safety, nothing usual there, most convertibles are not that strong i dont think i could ever drive one, i woudl fear for my life carl
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 05-31-2007, 04:37 PM | #2 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() Drives: M135i Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gloucestershire
|
Can't see any tests for the E92 or the E93 on the Euro NCAP site, just the E90:
http://www.euroncap.com/carsearch.as...1-3a9055c534ca
__________________
![]() Gone: Fiesta - Focus - E46 320dSE - E91 330dMSport - E82 135iMSport - R55 JCW Clubman Now: M135i with lots of toys |
![]() |
|
| 05-31-2007, 05:56 PM | #3 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() |
As I have an e93 I just read the test results to see if they are as bad as people are suggesting.
In short the e93 results for head on collisions were about the same as the e90 so good news on that front. It was the side impact that was worse. Since the e92 has much the same door design as the e93 I would suspect that any e92 tests would show similar results. On that basis one could conclude that in an accident of this kind the e92 would suffer a similar outcome in terms of damage and of course injuries etc. On the other hand because of the additional rigidity built into the e93 sills and floorpan the e92 could suffer a worse outcome to the e93. Miopyk ![]() |
![]() |
|
| 06-01-2007, 04:33 AM | #4 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: E93 320d M Sport, E81 116d SE Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Epsom UK
Posts: 686
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2006 120d SE [0.00]
2007 335d A M Sport [0.00] 1998 M3 Evo [0.00] 2002 330d Sport [0.00] 2004 330d Sport [0.00] |
Although the frameless doors are similar (maybe even the same) the e92 does benefit from a full height "B" pillar which will offer increased protection in a side impact.
Regards Chris
__________________
Previously: 2007 335D MSport E90 Le Mans Blue, 2004 330D A Sport Silver Grey, 2002 330D A Sport Saphire Black, 2001 320D SE Touring Titanium Silver, 1998 M3 Evo Techno Violet, 1996 328i Sport Montreal Blue, 1994 325i Coupe Red, 1989 325i Sport 2 door Dolphin Grey,1986 325i SE 4 door Lachs
|
![]() |
|
| 06-01-2007, 06:02 AM | #5 |
|
The Tarmac Terrorist
Drives: E46 M3 Tiag/Imola Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
yes but the e93 has no roof so has less structural rigidity than the e92
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 06-01-2007, 07:11 AM | #6 | |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Um, I don't think the e92 has a "b" piller either so in fact there is no more protection than the e93. In the test pictures having a roof wouldn't have helped either as the damage was all around the middle and the top of the door and rear panel. So if you think these tests were a concern on the e93 you would be foolish not to have the same concerns if you have an e92. Miopyk ![]() Last edited by miopyk; 06-01-2007 at 07:43 AM. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|