E90Post
 


ECS BMW
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > NA Engine (non-turbo) / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications > Charcoal Delete and K&N Filter revisited. Your personal experience Please :)



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-25-2011, 12:16 PM   #1
spacemonkey1112
Captain
 
spacemonkey1112's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i AW
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 818, CA

Posts: 960
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to spacemonkey1112
Charcoal Delete and K&N Filter revisited. Your personal experience Please :)

Been reading up on this and been wanting to do a charcoal delete & a K&N swap... I read numerous times that the prevalence of junk getting into my engine because of this would increase (and the charcoal delete can also F*)&# some of the engine ratios [what i mean by ratios is that the combustion could be off at least thats what some forum members have mentions; dont know the specific terms]) but what has your experience been? any problems?

Also, I know the US box uses a flat panel filter rather than a cylindrical shaped filter.. can I put a cylinder K&N filter into my car or do i have to get a Euro box? I sorta want a Euro box since cleaning the filter would be much easier (hopefully I could find it used somehow)
wow.. sorry for the crap ass post (dumb iphone app haha)
__________________
2006 E90 325i | Sports Package | 6MT | 3IM | PE | AA |

Last edited by spacemonkey1112; 10-25-2011 at 12:45 PM.
spacemonkey1112 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 12:18 PM   #2
Gavin@MMW
Brigadier General
 
Gavin@MMW's Avatar
 
Drives: MMW Supercharged E90 328i
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 818/805

Posts: 3,902
iTrader: (18)

Im editing this post, since the thread was changed to something legible

This is the best intake setup for the N52, it offers the best response for the money you can get. Pair it with some Cyba scoops for something that functions great and costs under $150 for the entire setup. The engine performs better with this setup then the aFe, or stock box (tested both on dynos) and you get the most reliable curve out of the K&N + Charcoal + Scoops setup.

Last edited by Gavin@MMW; 10-25-2011 at 12:40 PM.
Gavin@MMW is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 12:32 PM   #3
kamek
Brigadier General
 
Drives: 328xi 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Queens, NY

Posts: 3,172
iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 BMW 328xi  [4.10]
Send a message via AIM to kamek
Some claim the charcoal filter delete doesn't do anything for your car, and that the excess oil from the K&N can potentially damage your MAF sensor.
__________________

E92 328xi | KW | AA | LUX | OEM 359M | BMW Performance Exhaust
kamek is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 02:21 PM   #4
benzo23
Colonel
 
benzo23's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 F30 AW MSport
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FL

Posts: 2,884
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kamek View Post
Some claim the charcoal filter delete doesn't do anything for your car, and that the excess oil from the K&N can potentially damage your MAF sensor.
I use to have the K&N with charcoal delete...it was fine and to be honest i didnt notice anything different from stock, then swapped the K&N out for the $25 OEM paper filter and didnt notice a difference either, not with sound, revs or anything...I M O which means ( I N M Y O P I N I O N) I dont think K&N or paper makes a difference with the charcoal delete, If you can feel .0876 HP then by all means go for it...at least with the paper you dont have to worry about the mass air getting gunked up with oil like it did on my old mercedes, expensive day...
benzo23 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 03:44 PM   #5
Affify11
Second Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tulsa, Oklahomo

Posts: 275
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2006 E90 330i  [2.50]
I have done the Charcoal delete + K&N drop in.. it definitely makes a difference.. once you get up to around 5k rpm the intake makes noticeable deeper sound than stock. kinda sound like my friends E46 with a K&N intake. i did notice some response..I also ordered some scoops to add to the setup. Make sure to clean the MAF sensor when doing it, makes a big difference.
Affify11 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 03:52 PM   #6
fdriller9
Banned
 
Drives: '06 AW 330xi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey/Philly/NYC

Posts: 7,090
iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2006 330xi  [3.22]
It won't mess up your engine. There is a Maf sensor to monitor airflow. That will tell the engine how much air is being drawn into the intake manifold and that reading in combination with many others, will determine engine timing, valve lift, etc

If deleting the charcoal filter messed up the engine ratios BMW would be out of business. There are some many variables in the environment. If the engine was that sensitive, again BMW you be out of business.

I have a aFe oiled drop in, charcoal delete, and air silencer delete. Car runs great. A very slight increase in throttle response and sound.

The purpose of the carbon filter is to scrub the air that can leak back out after turning off the engine. Its an emissions thing. Has nothing to do with the performance of the car.
fdriller9 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 03:55 PM   #7
persianamir
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, Ca

Posts: 354
iTrader: (2)

only way knN will mess up ur maf sensor is if u use too much oil when you clean it...
persianamir is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 05:11 PM   #8
spacemonkey1112
Captain
 
spacemonkey1112's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i AW
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 818, CA

Posts: 960
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to spacemonkey1112
thanks for all your input, the maf sensor you are all talking about is the one that is attached around the intake hose correct? also, can someone link me to the appropriate K&N filter?
__________________
2006 E90 325i | Sports Package | 6MT | 3IM | PE | AA |
spacemonkey1112 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 06:02 PM   #9
Spacelyyy
Private First Class
 
Spacelyyy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Florida

Posts: 152
iTrader: (1)

I have RPI scoops and a K&N filter (no charcoal delete), you can fell a bit of a difference but not huge. Im happy with it
__________________
2006 e90 330i / 20% Window Tint / Matte Black Grill / CF Rear Window Spoiler / K&N Filter / Red 330i Emblem / CF Emblems / Red RPI Intake Scoops / Orange Footwell Glow / Red Calipers / E90Post.com Decals / MTEC LED License Plate Lights / GP Thunder 7500K Fogs / GP Thunder 7500K Daytimes
Spacelyyy is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 06:13 PM   #10
branmace
Private First Class
 
Drives: E90 330i
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SLC, UT

Posts: 102
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ********* View Post
It won't mess up your engine. There is a Maf sensor to monitor airflow. That will tell the engine how much air is being drawn into the intake manifold and that reading in combination with many others, will determine engine timing, valve lift, etc

If deleting the charcoal filter messed up the engine ratios BMW would be out of business. There are some many variables in the environment. If the engine was that sensitive, again BMW you be out of business.

I have a aFe oiled drop in, charcoal delete, and air silencer delete. Car runs great. A very slight increase in throttle response and sound.

The purpose of the carbon filter is to scrub the air that can leak back out after turning off the engine. Its an emissions thing. Has nothing to do with the performance of the car.
+1 ^_^
OP: All the response that you've gotten here is spot on. I just did this, K&N filter drop in, charcoal filter delete, this weekend and tested the air volume CFM (cubic feet per minute) through both media surfaces (OEM paper together w/charcoal filter and the K&N).

Here are my findings:

1. OEM Paper Filter - 324 CFM (K&N claims,for comparison, average disposable filter 319 CMF)
2. OEM Paper Filter w/charcoal filter - 309 CFM
3. K&N filter (panel p/n 33-2332) - 453 CFM (K&N claims on the box 441 CFM but with a slightly different filter)

I have to say, I feel pretty confidant about the results.
Tools used: 24" long x 3" diameter PVC pipe, a 3" diameter nipple, utility knife, AirFlo Digital Meter, the filters above, garden leaf blower/vacuum, and the good old American Made Duct Tape .

Summary of the results:

1. If you go with charcoal delete and OEM paper filter = 5% approx. air flow gain. You will get some HP and/or TQ, but may not feel the difference. The same goes with any throttle response. (I'm thinking < 1 HP/TQ)
2. If you go with K&N drop in and charcoal delete = 47% approx. air flow gain. You will get around, speaking conservatively, 2-3 HP/TQ and more responsive throttle (I feel it throughout the RPM range and when you want to step on it, it listens). If I have to compare the throttle response to the BMS PBX, I would say up to 20% snappier throttle response.
***The HP/TQ estimates are at the crank*** Use 15%-20% loss at the wheels.
3. I also used CRC Mass Air Flow cleaner to clean the sensor prior to starting the car and wiped off some of the excess oil from the K&N filter, too.

Hope this helps.

Oh, and I forgot...CYBA SCOOPS "BLK" on order
branmace is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 06:34 PM   #11
jc5988
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2010 328i 6MT Sport Pkg
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SOCAL

Posts: 383
iTrader: (0)

this should take care of your concern, K&N really dont give any meaningful gain. but consider its price and re-usability, its worth the money in my opinion.

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132028
__________________
N51- Perfomance Intake - Performance Exhaust - ESS Tuned - Performance SSK
jc5988 is online now  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 08:55 PM   #12
monkey_wrench
Caught the Bimmer-Bug
 
monkey_wrench's Avatar
 
Drives: '06 330i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida

Posts: 660
iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2006 330i  [0.00]
I just installed a K&N and removed the charcoal filter last Saturday.

It seems it revs up a bit better in the lower range, but that could just be me.

All in all, the car seems to run great.
monkey_wrench is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 08:56 PM   #13
monkey_wrench
Caught the Bimmer-Bug
 
monkey_wrench's Avatar
 
Drives: '06 330i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida

Posts: 660
iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2006 330i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gavin@MMW View Post
Im editing this post, since the thread was changed to something legible

This is the best intake setup for the N52, it offers the best response for the money you can get. Pair it with some Cyba scoops for something that functions great and costs under $150 for the entire setup. The engine performs better with this setup then the aFe, or stock box (tested both on dynos) and you get the most reliable curve out of the K&N + Charcoal + Scoops setup.
Are scoops really that effective on these things?
monkey_wrench is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 09:29 PM   #14
Johnny D
Major
 
Johnny D's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 BMW 325i
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hot Springs, AR

Posts: 1,124
iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2006 BMW 325i  [4.58]
I had an issue with my filter having to much oil right out of the box. Caused my engine to loose power. I had to clean my MAF sensor. Now that everything is cleaned and Ive had it for a few months, I cant say there is any difference what-so-ever.
Johnny D is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 10:22 PM   #15
OwnAge
Brigadier General
 
OwnAge's Avatar
 
Drives: LCI 328i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto. Newmarket.

Posts: 4,178
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2009 328i  [4.49]
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamek View Post
Some claim the charcoal filter delete doesn't do anything for your car
yep i dont feel any difference what so ever
__________________
3000k HID Fogs | Mtech 3300 AE | Alufelgen CS7 19" F 8.5, R 9.5 ET30 | ContiSport, F 235/R 275 | H&R Sport Springs | CF Perf. T.1 Trunk Spoiler | CF BMW Perf. Splitters | BMW Perf. Exhaust | iPhone4 Doc | PBX | K&E Filter/Charcoal Delete
OwnAge is offline   Armenia
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 10:38 PM   #16
Hooy
Colonel
 
Hooy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 328i Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX

Posts: 2,765
iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2008 E92 328  [2.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jntar View Post
I had an issue with my filter having to much oil right out of the box. Caused my engine to loose power. I had to clean my MAF sensor. Now that everything is cleaned and Ive had it for a few months, I cant say there is any difference what-so-ever.
My MPG went down miserably from the K&N oil right out of the box. I went from 16mpg back up to 23mpg within 3 tanks of gas, a maf cleaning, and a paper filter.
__________________
Hooy is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 10:48 PM   #17
kamek
Brigadier General
 
Drives: 328xi 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Queens, NY

Posts: 3,172
iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 BMW 328xi  [4.10]
Send a message via AIM to kamek
Quote:
Originally Posted by branmace View Post
+1 ^_^
OP: All the response that you've gotten here is spot on. I just did this, K&N filter drop in, charcoal filter delete, this weekend and tested the air volume CFM (cubic feet per minute) through both media surfaces (OEM paper together w/charcoal filter and the K&N).

Here are my findings:

1. OEM Paper Filter - 324 CFM (K&N claims,for comparison, average disposable filter 319 CMF)
2. OEM Paper Filter w/charcoal filter - 309 CFM
3. K&N filter (panel p/n 33-2332) - 453 CFM (K&N claims on the box 441 CFM but with a slightly different filter)

I have to say, I feel pretty confidant about the results.
Tools used: 24" long x 3" diameter PVC pipe, a 3" diameter nipple, utility knife, AirFlo Digital Meter, the filters above, garden leaf blower/vacuum, and the good old American Made Duct Tape .

Summary of the results:

1. If you go with charcoal delete and OEM paper filter = 5% approx. air flow gain. You will get some HP and/or TQ, but may not feel the difference. The same goes with any throttle response. (I'm thinking < 1 HP/TQ)
2. If you go with K&N drop in and charcoal delete = 47% approx. air flow gain. You will get around, speaking conservatively, 2-3 HP/TQ and more responsive throttle (I feel it throughout the RPM range and when you want to step on it, it listens). If I have to compare the throttle response to the BMS PBX, I would say up to 20% snappier throttle response.
***The HP/TQ estimates are at the crank*** Use 15%-20% loss at the wheels.
3. I also used CRC Mass Air Flow cleaner to clean the sensor prior to starting the car and wiped off some of the excess oil from the K&N filter, too.

Hope this helps.

Oh, and I forgot...CYBA SCOOPS "BLK" on order
You provided a lot of numbers, but can you provide a source or let us know where you derived these "estimates" from?

Tricking yourself into believing that you're gaining performance from these mods is different than actually gaining performance from these mods.

You're also stating that all of the responses here are correct, but they're mixed reviews. Even ********* said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ********* View Post
The purpose of the carbon filter is to scrub the air that can leak back out after turning off the engine. Its an emissions thing. Has nothing to do with the performance of the car.
__________________

E92 328xi | KW | AA | LUX | OEM 359M | BMW Performance Exhaust
kamek is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-25-2011, 10:54 PM   #18
Affify11
Second Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tulsa, Oklahomo

Posts: 275
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2006 E90 330i  [2.50]
You gotta take it on the highway to notice the difference.. i did some runs on the highway and the car seem more "Smooth". Give it a couple days. i just got some scoops and that made a good combo with the K&N and charcoal delete. My car runs better then ever!
Affify11 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-26-2011, 05:08 AM   #19
spacemonkey1112
Captain
 
spacemonkey1112's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i AW
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 818, CA

Posts: 960
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to spacemonkey1112
Had some questions as to how to clean the MAF sensor? and tips? How did you do it?
__________________
2006 E90 325i | Sports Package | 6MT | 3IM | PE | AA |
spacemonkey1112 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-26-2011, 05:44 AM   #20
monkey_wrench
Caught the Bimmer-Bug
 
monkey_wrench's Avatar
 
Drives: '06 330i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida

Posts: 660
iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2006 330i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemonkey1112 View Post
Had some questions as to how to clean the MAF sensor? and tips? How did you do it?
Take it out and hose it down with MAF sensor cleaner from Autozone/Advance Autoparts. Reinstall, and voila, clean.
monkey_wrench is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      10-26-2011, 06:31 AM   #21
nycbr
Second Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2008 TiAg 328xi
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: nu yawk

Posts: 220
iTrader: (0)

based on the numbers above it seems the charcoal filter has very little effect on air flow. is the charcoal filter behind the air filter? Perhaps leave it in so it would block any oil from a K&N filter from fouling the MAF
nycbr is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-26-2011, 08:38 AM   #22
benzo23
Colonel
 
benzo23's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 F30 AW MSport
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FL

Posts: 2,884
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nycbr View Post
based on the numbers above it seems the charcoal filter has very little effect on air flow. is the charcoal filter behind the air filter? Perhaps leave it in so it would block any oil from a K&N filter from fouling the MAF
Yes the charcoal is behind the regular air filer...
benzo23 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST