E90Post
 


TireRack
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Fun with data acquisition (0-60mph, 0-100mph, 1/4 mile, acceleration rates, etc)



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-14-2007, 05:19 PM   #1
leftcoastman
Lieutenant Colonel
23

 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Near some canyons


Posts: 1,710
iTrader: (1)

Fun with data acquisition (0-60mph, 0-100mph, 1/4 mile, acceleration rates, etc)

For geeks only:

Those of you with PROcede (or maybe even XEDE) can take heart in the fact that you can get some quite accurate performance "metrics" using the data acquisition capabilities of the system.

By that, I don't mean that you can get accurate HP/Torque numbers. Rather, I mean that just by gathering the following data channels during a hard acceleration run:

-RPM
-Time
-MAP

and combining it with the gear ratios (from bmwusa.com), you can determine the following:

1) 0-xxx MPH times (0-60, 0-100, what have you)
2) xxx foot times (60ft, 1320ft, etc.)
3) Boost
4) Nearly instantaneous acceleration rates (the software records data at 0.04-0.05 second intervals)

From (4), I calculated the RPM/Second rate of increase to see where acceleration is strongest and where it tails off. This helps me determine the appropriate shift points.

The 1/4 mile times calculated from the acquired data was compared against a drag run and it was SPOT on.

I'm in a bit of a hurry, but this should plant the seed in your mind - let me know if you can't figure out the actual steps to do it..
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2007, 10:36 AM   #2
DrDomer
Major
United_States
21

 
DrDomer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 330ci ZHP, 1999 Miata
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Iowa


Posts: 1,349
iTrader: (0)

I'm too stupid to figure out this riddle. What are the numbers you came up with?
__________________
Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. ~Albert Einstein
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2007, 11:24 AM   #3
leftcoastman
Lieutenant Colonel
23

 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Near some canyons


Posts: 1,710
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDomer View Post
I'm too stupid to figure out this riddle. What are the numbers you came up with?
It's actually dependent on each vehicle and the atmospheric conditions. By taking the information from the analysis, I was able to shave 1/2 second off my ET (that's really amazing to me considering I was consistent within 0.1 seconds on ET up until now)

Here are some more steps:

1) Take the MAP, Time and RPM readings using the Procede software while doing a few hard acceleration runs.

2) Open the data in Excel, figure out your shift points (right before MAP spike, through the boost decline, right up to when it starts going up again). A further advantage is you can precisely calculate your shift times.

3) Apply the RPM to MPH factors for various gears to the appropriate data points to determine your speed during the run.

For 1st, it's 0.005692308 mph per RPM
For 2nd, it's 0.009692308
For 3rd, it's 0.014923077
For 4th, it's 0.019692308

4) Create a column that shows your "time from start of run" by subtracting each data point's time from the start time.

5) Calculate feet covered during each data point interval by taking MPH at that data point, divide by 60, divide by 60 and multiply by 5280. That gives you feet per second. Then multiply that by the time difference between that data point and the one before it.

6) Total distance is determined by creating a running sum of the feet covered.

7) If you want to get fancy, you can calculate the rate of MPH/Min, which will show you precisely where your acceleration is the strongest.

Create a graph using Excel, (RPM vs. whatever you want) and then I would recommend adding a moving average trendline to smooth out the data.

From the chart and the data table, you can determine 60ft times, 1320ft times, trap speed, 0-60, 0-100, whatever you want.

Disclaimer: The data might be slightly (we're talking 0.01 seconds) optimistic because it assumes all rpm increases result in forward motion, which is obviously not true when you spin your tires. But luckily tire spinning typically occurs at low speed, so the data skewing isn't too bad.

As I said, my "software derived" 1/4 mile time matched the dragstrip time precisely.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST