|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
On-Off road biking
|
|
07-10-2012, 05:17 PM | #23 | |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Quote:
I demo'd Campy when I bought the "A" bike. Love the ability to dump gears up AND down the cassette. Love the silent drivetrain. Can't stand the thumb lever positioning. My former coach is a big CX nut. I like the vibe (Keep CX Weird!) and have been kicking around the idea of a CX rig as soon as they nail down 'brifters mated to disc brakes. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2012, 05:22 PM | #24 |
Resident Kerbalnaut
483
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Clearly you guys are far more serious about this than I am.
I'll see if I can get my cousin to answer a few questions. He rides every weekend from midtown, manhattan to bear mountain and participates in the tour de France (5 or 10 years running) He might be more up to your speed |
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2012, 05:27 PM | #25 | |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
In a typical year, I try to get out to New Mexico and Colorado for both mountain biking and good road rides, but I've been a total slacker this year and haven't even hit 1k miles yet, which I normally do by March. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2012, 06:08 PM | #26 | ||
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Quote:
Tell us more about your cousin. Is he a pro rider? Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2012, 06:17 PM | #27 | |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
I do miss that greatly, excellent riding on PCH and I had canyon trails literally out of my door. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2012, 10:24 PM | #28 | |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Quote:
+1 on PCH. I was just riding down there about a month ago. Awesome riding! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 09:58 AM | #29 |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
How do you like your Pro Machine? A riding buddy has a Race Machine that seems to go against the old meaning of BMC, Beat My Crotch. They were known for being really stiff frames, but the later models seem to be addressing that.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 12:26 PM | #30 |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
LOL... "Beat My Crotch"! I'm surprised to hear that, because since I started paying attention to BMC they've been revered as having a pretty smooth ride.
I absolutely LOVE this bike! Compared to my Trek 2.1 (which shared geometry with the Madone), it's a much more agressive geometry. The Trek has a slightly longer wheelbase and requires a bit less concentration in a straight line, but the BMC corners and descends like it's on rails and is more responsive to inputs. It's just soooo willing to take a line! The ride is interesting: It's not quite as plush as a high-end Madone or a Tarmac, but it's smooth and lively. It reminds me of my e46 since it's very balanced and the feedback always lets me know where the grip is. If I were to change anything about the current build, I'd probably throw on a carbon stem and handlebars to quiet just a bit of the road vibration at the front. As is the trend with recent race bikes, the chain stays and the area around the bottom bracket are really beefy and the power transfer is amazing. I'm not someone who puts down a ton of wattage, but I can definitely feel the increase in snap and acceleration in this bike, which comes in handy in tight, technical criteriums. Competitive Cyclist did a review () and it's pretty much spot on. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 12:43 PM | #31 |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Cool. I use a small builder in Oregon for my bikes and my latest road bike has super short and stout chainstays. Power transfer is great and it's snappy and quick, but not nearly as much as a cruiser or as sedate as my previous bike (a classic steel Italian), but I was looking for a better race bike and that's what I got. I think I'm going to keep the aggressiveness for my cx bike but may go stainless instead of ti this go around.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 02:52 PM | #32 | |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Quote:
Just out of curiosity, why stainless instead of ti? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 02:52 PM | #33 |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Oh.. BTW to the original poster... sorry for the
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 03:41 PM | #34 |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Yeah, sorry for the complete derailment.
Stainless over ti just because I prefer the way steel rides over ti, and with similar anti-corrosion capabilities from stainless compared to it, it just seems like an easy personal choice. The limiting factor is hardware, ti already has plenty of OS headtube choices and PF30 or BB30 shells, while stainless has been lagging behind on these choices. Plus I want to do discs, so I need burlier chain and seat stays and that's tougher with stainless, so I may end up going ti again anyway, or I may accept a little corrosion risk and go with a steel tubeset. Finally, pure vanity, polished stainless makes for a classic, nearly chrome chain stay look when done up with a mostly painted/powdered frame. My current bike is ti with acid etching and it's just a boring look. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2012, 04:37 PM | #35 |
First Lieutenant
146
Rep 399
Posts
Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
|
What? Nobody EVER makes purchase decisions based on aesthetics.
Kidding. Totally makes sense. Part of the reason I liked the BMC was the structural look of the frame. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|