E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Technical Forums > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis > Results: M3 front control arm/wishbone upgrade (no tension struts)



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-22-2012, 10:56 PM   #1
BMWM.D.
Stupid Idiot
 
BMWM.D.'s Avatar
 
Drives: E90 335i & C6 Grand Sport
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Santa Barbara

Posts: 684
iTrader: (1)

Results: M3 front control arm/wishbone upgrade (no tension struts)

This has probably been done and covered before, but I figured I'd share my results for anyone considering changing to any M3 suspension parts. Here it goes....

I personally aligned my E90 335i about a month ago on our brand new Hunter/BMW KDS alignment machine. The car has under 25k miles and everything looked as it should, so I set the rear camber and front/rear toe to BMW's specifications:

rear camber: -1 50' (1 degree & 50 minutes)
rear toe: 18'
front toe: 14'
Caster (not adjustable) : 7 05' / 7 00'

What I didn't like was my front camber:

left: - 14' (-.23 degrees)
right: -31' (-.51 degrees)

That's right around 1/4 degree negative on the left and 1/2 degree negative on the right for you guys that don't use the minute system. This is my second E90 335i, and the first one I had (same year/model) started showing wear on the outside shoulders of the front tires. There were actually almost bald when I traded that car in with only 17k miles. The rest of the tire looked great.

Anyway, I decided I wanted some more negative camber on this car. Besides possibly evening out the front tire wear for the way I drive, it should improve front end grip and reduce understeer. I see that as win-win. Since I don't like removing the strut locating pin to make adjustments, I decided to try the M3 control arms, or wishbones as BMW calls them.

Since I really don't have any complaints with the ride quality and handling of this car, I decided to not replace the tension struts -- just the 2 lower front control arms and the needed headlight sensor link. The install was very quick and I'm quite happy with how it came out. Since I had just aligned this car on this same alignment machine about a month ago, I think I got a very accurate idea of what should be gained by just changing these arms.

Results:

First, let me say that doing this threw my front toe MAJORLY out of whack. It was bad just driving it through the shop to the alignment bay. The tires were scrubbing badly and the steering was horrible. The total front toe was almost +6 degrees before I made my adjustments, so be very careful if planning to drive the car prior to alignment.

Anyway, here were the final numbers:
camber
left: - 47' (-.78 degrees)
right: - 53' (-.88 degrees)

caster
left: 7 31' (7.51 degrees)
right: 7 27' (7.45 degrees)

So I gained a around a half a degree of negative camber and an extra ~half degree of caster. The strut pins were not removed. Not only did I get the results I was hoping for, but it seemed to even out my cross-camber readings without needing any adjustments to the strut mounting. I haven't noticed any difference in ride quality, but the car does seem more stable at freeway speeds -- probably from the caster gain. Besides a little more toe-in both front and rear, the car is very close to E90 M3 specifications.

I think the conclusion here is that the M3 control arms (wishbones) are what's responsible for the camber and most of the caster changes on these M3 control arm upgrades. I will probably change the tension struts in the future when my run-flats wear out, but for now I don't want any added stiffness or vibration. For the minimal cost, I think this is a great upgrade.
__________________
BMWM.D. is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-23-2012, 01:47 AM   #2
lbernielu
Private
 
Drives: 2006 330i, sp, Bilstein, H&R
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sacramento

Posts: 71
iTrader: (0)

Since you have some M3 front suspension parts, you may want to check out the factory M3 suspension specifications with respect to toe, front and rear. Many experienced track drivers Claim to run 0 front toe and minimum rear. The factory 335 specifications contribute greatly to tire wear, particularly with increased camber, and provide more stability than is necessary. I personally run minimum factory toe front and rear, and am pleased with having more responsive turn-in, without any perceived degradation in straight line stability at normal freeway speeds and more.
lbernielu is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-23-2012, 09:26 AM   #3
mlifxs
Diamond Geezer
 
mlifxs's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet Black 2007 328i Saloon
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida

Posts: 1,570
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Thanks for this. Glad to hear about the improvements.

I'm about to install these as well. I pulled my alignment pins a few months ago and pushed camber to -.5, -.6. I'll post my camber numbers after install.
mlifxs is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-23-2012, 11:55 AM   #4
BMWM.D.
Stupid Idiot
 
BMWM.D.'s Avatar
 
Drives: E90 335i & C6 Grand Sport
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Santa Barbara

Posts: 684
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbernielu View Post
Since you have some M3 front suspension parts, you may want to check out the factory M3 suspension specifications with respect to toe, front and rear. Many experienced track drivers Claim to run 0 front toe and minimum rear. The factory 335 specifications contribute greatly to tire wear, particularly with increased camber, and provide more stability than is necessary. I personally run minimum factory toe front and rear, and am pleased with having more responsive turn-in, without any perceived degradation in straight line stability at normal freeway speeds and more.
Thanks, I actually changed the specs for my alignment to an M3 for comparison before I finished. The M3s run 10' of toe both front and rear, compared to 18'/14' on the 335i. So a good amount less toe-in on the front axle.

I probably will change to the M3 toe spec in the future. The only reason I didn't on Friday was that I was short on time and the rear axle was already dialed-in from my prior alignment. You're right, though -- too much toe-in will cause wear on the outside shoulders. I just didn't like how little front camber the car had. With the M3 arms, it's now almost identical to my E46 330ci.

And yeah, I actually run almost zero front toe on my C6 Corvette. I didn't notice any stability issues at all on that car, and tire wear has been great. That car is more of a weekend toy, so I went more aggressive on the alignment.
__________________
BMWM.D. is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-18-2013, 02:47 PM   #5
mlifxs
Diamond Geezer
 
mlifxs's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet Black 2007 328i Saloon
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida

Posts: 1,570
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlifxs View Post
Thanks for this. Glad to hear about the improvements.

I'm about to install these as well. I pulled my alignment pins a few months ago and pushed camber to -.5, -.6. I'll post my camber numbers after install.
OP I wasn't able to reach your camber level, possibly due to how I instructed the shop (where I have an alignment contract). After I pushed the struts in, had the alignment and told them to make no camber adjustment, just toe.

result was -1.0 left, -1.1 right.

was expecting a little more.
__________________
AA Stage 2 - M3 control Arms FR - BMW PS1 - APEX EC-7 - H&R front swaybar - GC street camber plates - Whiteline subframe inserts
mlifxs is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-18-2013, 03:28 PM   #6
cvc 22349a
Colonel
 
cvc 22349a's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SF Bay

Posts: 2,179
iTrader: (8)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlifxs View Post
OP I wasn't able to reach your camber level, possibly due to how I instructed the shop (where I have an alignment contract). After I pushed the struts in, had the alignment and told them to make no camber adjustment, just toe.

result was -1.0 left, -1.1 right.

was expecting a little more.
That's all I got with M3 lower links, alignment pins pulled and PS springs.
__________________
2007 E90 335i, TiAg, 6AT, ZPP, ZSP, ZCW, 6FL, HD
Quaife lsd, ETS fmic, GIAC s/w, Dinan intake/exhaust/oc, KW/GC/M3/Meyle susp, Apex Arc 8, Mich PSS
cvc 22349a is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-18-2013, 03:32 PM   #7
mlifxs
Diamond Geezer
 
mlifxs's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet Black 2007 328i Saloon
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida

Posts: 1,570
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by cvc 22349a View Post
That's all I got with M3 lower links, alignment pins pulled and PS springs.
thanks. That kind of suggests to me that the M3 wishbones really only add .5 (?)

I have some Dinan plates ready to go but wondering if the tire wear is worth putting them on....and I just used my yearly "free" alignment on my alignment contract.
__________________
AA Stage 2 - M3 control Arms FR - BMW PS1 - APEX EC-7 - H&R front swaybar - GC street camber plates - Whiteline subframe inserts
mlifxs is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-18-2013, 05:42 PM   #8
thefull9yards
Private
 
thefull9yards's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Sparkling Graphite 328i
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA

Posts: 67
iTrader: (0)

Do you need to change out the control arms just to adjust camber? What about toe-in? Sorry, I'm just not too knowledgeable about changing that stuff.
thefull9yards is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-18-2013, 05:56 PM   #9
mlifxs
Diamond Geezer
 
mlifxs's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet Black 2007 328i Saloon
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida

Posts: 1,570
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
M3 wishbones give negative camber but, an alignment is needed after install to adjust massive toe in that also occurs.
__________________
AA Stage 2 - M3 control Arms FR - BMW PS1 - APEX EC-7 - H&R front swaybar - GC street camber plates - Whiteline subframe inserts
mlifxs is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-19-2013, 07:13 AM   #10
vasillalov
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
 
vasillalov's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL

Posts: 4,132
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
2008 335i E90  [4.00]
Weird... With the M3 control arms and tension rods, I was able to get -1.4 degrees Left and -1.5 degrees right of negative camber on the front. I believe the tow was set to 335i specs.
__________________
Equal Opportunity Harasser!
6MT | COBB | AR | AE | Forge DV | HPF | P3 Gauge | Hybrid Intake | O.S.Giken TCD | All M3 bits | TCKLine
vasillalov is offline   Bulgaria
0
Reply With Quote
      04-19-2013, 08:09 AM   #11
mlifxs
Diamond Geezer
 
mlifxs's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet Black 2007 328i Saloon
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida

Posts: 1,570
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by vasillalov
Weird... With the M3 control arms and tension rods, I was able to get -1.4 degrees Left and -1.5 degrees right of negative camber on the front. I believe the tow was set to 335i specs.
yeah, that's what I was hoping for. I may have someone do an alignment check as a second opinion.

Certainly don't regret the upgrade. Handling and steering feel is noticeably improved.
__________________
AA Stage 2 - M3 control Arms FR - BMW PS1 - APEX EC-7 - H&R front swaybar - GC street camber plates - Whiteline subframe inserts
mlifxs is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-22-2013, 11:48 AM   #12
rikuvalpas
Registered
 
Drives: BMW 320iA E90
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Riyadh

Posts: 1
iTrader: (0)

M3 Front Control Arm Upgrade kit for 2007 320iA

Hi All,

I'm considering buying the M3 Front Control Arm Upgrade kit for my 2007 BMW 320iA to replace the worn out original parts.

I was checking some American web forums and I could only find references to six cylinder E90 models. Apparently BMW does not sell the smaller 4 cylinder models in the States.

Do you know whether they work also on the 4 cylinder models (2007 320iA specifically)?
rikuvalpas is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-22-2013, 01:09 PM   #13
cvc 22349a
Colonel
 
cvc 22349a's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SF Bay

Posts: 2,179
iTrader: (8)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rikuvalpas
Hi All,

I'm considering buying the M3 Front Control Arm Upgrade kit for my 2007 BMW 320iA to replace the worn out original parts.

I was checking some American web forums and I could only find references to six cylinder E90 models. Apparently BMW does not sell the smaller 4 cylinder models in the States.

Do you know whether they work also on the 4 cylinder models (2007 320iA specifically)?
Yes they will fit. But I would only install them if you are running traditional tires. The bushings/bearings in the m3 control arms will be too hard with runflat tires
__________________
2007 E90 335i, TiAg, 6AT, ZPP, ZSP, ZCW, 6FL, HD
Quaife lsd, ETS fmic, GIAC s/w, Dinan intake/exhaust/oc, KW/GC/M3/Meyle susp, Apex Arc 8, Mich PSS
cvc 22349a is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      09-23-2013, 10:44 AM   #14
phil200tdi
Colonel
 
phil200tdi's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i M Sport E90 LCI manual
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Aylesbury

Posts: 2,592
iTrader: (1)

Sorry to resurect an old thread!

I recently fitted M3 front control arms and went for M3 specs all round.

Car feels less planted at speed and darts around with road camber. Also felt a slightly floating feeling when exiting a left hand bend at speed - like oversteer at 80mph = #brownpantstime

Should I try going less aggressive on the Toe and revert to 335i specs for this?
__________________
Car: 2010 Jaguar XFR (Stock - For now)
Gone but not forgotten: Highly Modified E90 335i LCI M Sport Manual (circa 480BHP/500lb ft)
phil200tdi is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      09-23-2013, 11:11 AM   #15
mike-y
just another bmw douche bag
 
Drives: 1.9L of fury
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Posts: 3,389
iTrader: (4)

additional front camber will make turn-in more responsive, and "darty" feeling, especially if you run less toe in.

you can increase the front toe-in back to 335i specs if you want to help tone that down (and/or reduce the camber a bit), and if the rear end feels too "loose", you can run a bit more toe-in and/or negative camber to calm that down.

The M3 is setup as a dual purpose street/track car, so the alignment specs are geared more toward quicker turning response and neutral handling, rather than street stability and comfort.
mike-y is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      09-23-2013, 02:28 PM   #16
phil200tdi
Colonel
 
phil200tdi's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i M Sport E90 LCI manual
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Aylesbury

Posts: 2,592
iTrader: (1)

I like the added crispness of the turn in.

But, the floatyness on high speed bends is a big concern on the road - I actually started opposite locking on a motorway! Previously the car would be solid in this situation.

We have lots of truck tracks (tramlines) in the UK - with this setup the car is carried around much more. I'd prefer a slightly less agressive setup and more in keeping with a DD setup..

I'll dig out the setup specs tomorrow night - I'm away from home tonight. Hopefully increasing the toe will improve things!
__________________
Car: 2010 Jaguar XFR (Stock - For now)
Gone but not forgotten: Highly Modified E90 335i LCI M Sport Manual (circa 480BHP/500lb ft)
phil200tdi is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      09-23-2013, 04:45 PM   #17
rborane
Private First Class
 
Drives: E90 335i 6-Speed
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Posts: 126
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil200tdi View Post
I like the added crispness of the turn in.

But, the floatyness on high speed bends is a big concern on the road - I actually started opposite locking on a motorway! Previously the car would be solid in this situation.

We have lots of truck tracks (tramlines) in the UK - with this setup the car is carried around much more. I'd prefer a slightly less agressive setup and more in keeping with a DD setup..

I'll dig out the setup specs tomorrow night - I'm away from home tonight. Hopefully increasing the toe will improve things!
This may be a repeated question already but what alignment specs do you do on a 335i, when putting on M3 front control arms?
rborane is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      09-23-2013, 06:05 PM   #18
GreekboyD
Colonel
 
Drives: 2009 BMW 335d
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

Posts: 2,309
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 BMW 335d  [4.00]
I'd go with 335i specs.
GreekboyD is offline   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
      09-26-2013, 11:05 AM   #19
phil200tdi
Colonel
 
phil200tdi's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i M Sport E90 LCI manual
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Aylesbury

Posts: 2,592
iTrader: (1)

Here are the before and after values:
Attached Images
 
__________________
Car: 2010 Jaguar XFR (Stock - For now)
Gone but not forgotten: Highly Modified E90 335i LCI M Sport Manual (circa 480BHP/500lb ft)

Last edited by phil200tdi; 09-26-2013 at 11:12 AM.
phil200tdi is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST