E90Post
 


TireRack
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Photography/Videography > Lens recommendation



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-01-2008, 01:35 PM   #1
BMWE90
Major
 
BMWE90's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 335
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area

Posts: 1,153
iTrader: (1)

Lens recommendation

I'm looking to purchase a decent telephoto lens to use for a while with my XSi before upgrading to the L lenses. I'm trying to decide between the Canon 55-250mm IS and the 70-300mm IS USM. The former is about $260 and the latter is about $480. I've seen the pictures that were taken by both lenses and they all looked nice with the 70-300mm lens being a bit sharper.

I'm just wondering if the 70-300mm lens is worth the extra $220 (almost essentially doubling the price of the 55-250mm). The 55-250 would be the cheaper way to go but I don't mind spending more for a better lens (if that's the case here). Any advice is appreciated!
BMWE90 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      11-01-2008, 03:34 PM   #2
Teshi
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: Blue/Usually full of camera ge
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Harrow - London

Posts: 357
iTrader: (0)

I would honestly go for the 70-300 IS USM unless you plan to upgrade to a 70-200L later down the line. Its a great lens and one that will last you years.

I rather pay for better optics any time.
Teshi is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      11-01-2008, 07:28 PM   #3
The_Blob
Second Lieutenant
 
The_Blob's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 E92 335i
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada

Posts: 290
iTrader: (0)

My Dad just bought a Canon 55-250mm IS about 3 weeks ago. It's nothing really amazing but the IS does help for shots over 200mm if you don't have a tripod. I'll say the lense quality is very similar to Powershot S camera models, but just a tad better in image quality due to the fact that it's designed for a SLR camera. The lense itself is very light and it's fine for casual pictures for non serious events.

If you want quality photos, I only recommend L lenses.
The_Blob is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      11-01-2008, 07:56 PM   #4
BMWE90
Major
 
BMWE90's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 335
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area

Posts: 1,153
iTrader: (1)

Teshi- yeah but I was just wondering if it's really worth it. I've heard that image quality between the 2 lenses are almost identical. I know USM would be a nice perk and that the build quality is a bit better but is it worth the extra $220? Should I just save the money for later when I upgrade?

TheBlob- I will probably upgrade to an L lens later (eyeing the 100-400mm) but for now it's more than what I want to spend. It's just for fun right now so I'm not looking to invest heavily in equipment just yet.
BMWE90 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      11-01-2008, 11:32 PM   #5
clubspec330i
Second Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2008 E90 M3
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: So. Cal

Posts: 291
iTrader: (0)

70-300 is a great start.
I had that lens and sold it with my XTi when I upgrade to 5D a year ago. Now I have 70-200F2.8L IS, couldn't be happier.

I have never tried 55-200(~90-320mm) but I probably give it a shot because of price difference rather than 70-300.

Good luck,

Mack
clubspec330i is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      11-02-2008, 02:40 AM   #6
l4wr3nc3
The Law.
 
l4wr3nc3's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rowland Heights, CA

Posts: 14,277
iTrader: (17)

Send a message via AIM to l4wr3nc3
I've also heard nothing but great things about the 70-300. Never played with or known anyone that shot with the 55-250 so i cant comment on that, but you definitely cant go wrong with the 70-300!
__________________

2008 Lotus Exige S240 | 2007 BMW 335i
l4wr3nc3 is offline   Taiwan
0
Reply With Quote
      11-02-2008, 04:37 AM   #7
Teshi
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: Blue/Usually full of camera ge
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Harrow - London

Posts: 357
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWE90 View Post
Teshi- yeah but I was just wondering if it's really worth it. I've heard that image quality between the 2 lenses are almost identical. I know USM would be a nice perk and that the build quality is a bit better but is it worth the extra $220? Should I just save the money for later when I upgrade?

TheBlob- I will probably upgrade to an L lens later (eyeing the 100-400mm) but for now it's more than what I want to spend. It's just for fun right now so I'm not looking to invest heavily in equipment just yet.
Oh hell yes. You never know when USM will come into play and nail that shot. I would happily pay that much extra just for USM and extra length.

To be honest, if you thinking about an L in the future. Dont rush to buy lenses now unless your job depends on it. Save for a decent lens and commit.

After 2 years, the longest lens I have is 85mm and saving for the longer lenses. Its doable.
Teshi is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST