E90Post
 


European Auto Source
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > FMIC or Methanol?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-27-2009, 12:09 PM   #1
e92law
First Lieutenant
 
e92law's Avatar
 
Drives: e70
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AZ

Posts: 340
iTrader: (0)

FMIC or Methanol?

FMIC or Methanol?

They both work to reduce intake temperatures, but which is better? Better in terms of performance, ease of install/removal, warranty considerations, etc.

I was planning on going with a new FMIC, but with all of the recent methanol kit development, I am thinking that I should go in that direction instead.

Some background: I live in AZ, so heat is a MAJOR issue.

Thanks guys.
e92law is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 12:11 PM   #2
HPFREAK
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: 09 135 CPE
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Socal

Posts: 1,872
iTrader: (8)

FMIC for all your concerns. having a meth nozzle plumbed into the intake and a tank in the trunk will raise issues at the dealer. that being said meth is very good at reducing and keep IAT's down, and will make more power overall because you can run higher boost maps on it because of the octane enhancement.
HPFREAK is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 12:45 PM   #3
GTR-Dad
Driver
 
GTR-Dad's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 M5 - DCT
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Beaumont, AB

Posts: 207
iTrader: (0)

A FMIC has fewer moving parts, never runs dry, doesn't ever lose power, and is therefore more reliable. I'd start there and add Meth if I needed more cooling.
Dan
GTR-Dad is offline   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 01:01 PM   #4
Sniz
Lieutenant General
 
Sniz's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD

Posts: 10,569
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR-Dad View Post
A FMIC has fewer moving parts, never runs dry, doesn't ever lose power, and is therefore more reliable. I'd start there and add Meth if I needed more cooling.
Dan
+1

but they do lose power when they get heat soaked
__________________
Sniz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 01:16 PM   #5
Mike@N54Tuning.com
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor

 
Drives: 07335i
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Earth

Posts: 14,705
iTrader: (87)

FMIC followed by DPs and the meth

Mike
__________________
LOWEST PRICE GURANTEE ON ALL PRODUCTS - www.n54tuning.com - Email; Mike@n54tuning.com
NEW PERFORMANCE LINE N54 DOWNPIPES & M3/M4 & F30 ER DOWNPIPES NOW IN STOCK - ER N54 CHARPE PIPE SPECIALS - NEW JB4 G5 ISO for N54 and F30 N55 ON SALE
Mike@N54Tuning.com is online now   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 01:25 PM   #6
Joshboody
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: pickemuptruck
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Posts: 1,708
iTrader: (7)

good question... i am debating this also. And live in Phoenix. I think it does depend on boost expectation, and other mods. originally I was thinking meth, but I don't really plan on DPs, or changing stock intake, so i will be limited on boost, thus FMIC maybe better for me.

my other thoughts pertain to timing. Unless you retard timing, especially in AZ, we will and do bounce of the knock limit even in stock form. Meth cools below ambient, and should keep you away from the stock timing target and thus safer in the long run.

The stock FMIC works very well at 8psi and I would think at 8psi stock=aftermarket FMIC (or close), but at higher boost timing curve changes even with FMIC... so IAT similar to stock, but higher boost... thus timing needs retard. BUT with meth maybe not and less timing worries. I know timing is a huge subject on this board, and i think the DME is designed to locate knock and retard, but i would feel better if i never saw this. We know how the JB and procede work, but wish the flash guys would give more feedback... this would help my decisions. FMIC you have more tunning options.
Joshboody is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 01:58 PM   #7
Sniz
Lieutenant General
 
Sniz's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD

Posts: 10,569
iTrader: (1)

fmic would be the 1st mod I do to any n54
__________________
Sniz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 02:56 PM   #8
e92law
First Lieutenant
 
e92law's Avatar
 
Drives: e70
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AZ

Posts: 340
iTrader: (0)

The general consensus seems to be for the FMIC. I agree on the moving parts, etc., but it would be interesting to see them tested against each other. No meth specific tune, but dyno runs just comparing the cooling ability of a new FMIC to Meth. I notice a massive drop off in power above 90 degrees or so. Needless to say, at 120 in the summer, it feels like stock.
e92law is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 02:59 PM   #9
JBiddy
Brigadier General
 
Drives: e90 ///M
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern/N.J

Posts: 3,625
iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e92law View Post
The general consensus seems to be for the FMIC. I agree on the moving parts, etc., but it would be interesting to see them tested against each other. No meth specific tune, but dyno runs just comparing the cooling ability of a new FMIC to Meth. I notice a massive drop off in power above 90 degrees or so. Needless to say, at 120 in the summer, it feels like stock.
at those temperatures i would not even drive the car hard...
__________________
///M
JBiddy is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 04:17 PM   #10
e92law
First Lieutenant
 
e92law's Avatar
 
Drives: e70
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AZ

Posts: 340
iTrader: (0)

I have seen 135 show up on the dash. Not fun.
e92law is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 04:51 PM   #11
carve
Major
 
carve's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: usa

Posts: 1,098
iTrader: (0)

I think evaporative cooling of meth would be far more productive out in AZ. You can't get that cold blowing hot air over an intercooler, and the dry air is particularly receptive to evaporative cooling. You'd probably do well just filing the meth tank with ice water or water in a pinch.

The downsides are dealer issues and that the tank runs dry.

Idea: would it make sense to put your meth injection BEFORE the intercooler? Your total temp drop may not be as much, but the volume of air flowing through the cooler would be less for a give mass flow, which means the turbos wouldn't have to work as hard to make a specific manifold pressure, which means the air wouldn't get as hot to begin with.
carve is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 05:34 PM   #12
Joshboody
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: pickemuptruck
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Posts: 1,708
iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by carve View Post
The downsides are dealer issues and that the tank runs dry.
not sure exactly how the meth nozzle is attached but if you had 2 intake sections 1 with nozzle, 1 stock... not so difficult?? running the lines back and forth each time maybe a pain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by carve View Post
Idea: would it make sense to put your meth injection BEFORE the intercooler? Your total temp drop may not be as much, but the volume of air flowing through the cooler would be less for a give mass flow, which means the turbos wouldn't have to work as hard to make a specific manifold pressure, which means the air wouldn't get as hot to begin with.
boost target is measured in the manifold and colder temps mean less volume, more density... so turbos would work less at same boost with nozzle closest to throttle plate then before IC... right? may depend on where MAF/IAT sensor is located though. right before MAF could lessen turbo load. IF meth was injected inbetween MAF and manifold pressure then target boost would be overshot?? Could this induce throttle closure to decrease boost? boy i'm getting confused.
Joshboody is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-27-2009, 08:14 PM   #13
marcvtec
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: toronto

Posts: 1,791
iTrader: (0)

First tune, than Dps + Fmic same day like I did,,, wow that made a difference than meth as icing on the cake,,,, and intake when you are bored
__________________
COBB Powered, Spec2+, Wavetrac, DCI, Forge DV's, AR catless DP's, AA FMIC, M3 links & Sways, 19' BBS LM's wrapped in PSS, Zimmerman cross drilled rotors, hawk carbon pads, M3 Spoiler, AC roof Spoiler, Aero Lip, Vorsteiner Diffuser, m3 sides, Tinted, And One Happy BMW Driver.
marcvtec is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-28-2009, 03:00 AM   #14
Bomis
Captain
 
Bomis's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sweden

Posts: 990
iTrader: (1)

fmic and dp's...
__________________


EURO E92 M3 2008 6MT Interlagos ///Fully Loaded! Evolve-R ECU Flash/Gintani Sport Exhaust/MS Stg2 Intake Kit/H&R Springs/MS 18/15 mm spacers/Bmw Perf. Grills/Gloss Black side gills/LCI Tails/LUX V3's/RD license plate leds
Bomis is offline   Sweden
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST