E90Post
 


MINHS Auto Care Center
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > Regional Forums > Australia > anyone driven the 3.2 TT?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-04-2007, 05:26 AM   #1
danielt
Lieutenant
 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Qld, Australia

Posts: 400
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 E92 335i  [0.00]
Send a message via ICQ to danielt Send a message via MSN to danielt
anyone driven the 3.2 TT?

just wondering if anyone's driven the 3.2 TT Coupe? Similar 0-100 km/hr as the 335 steptronic (5.7 secs). For whatever reason, to me (my opinion only) it didn't feel fast at all. Interesting, because my impression before driving it, would be that it might have a similar feeling of acceleration to the 335i (at least when I last drove the 335 a few months ago), given it's similar performance. Didn't give that push back in the seat type of acceleration.
danielt is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      02-05-2007, 08:09 PM   #2
recruiter
Private
 
recruiter's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i Montego Blue(manual)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney Australia

Posts: 70
iTrader: (0)

Have not driven a tt (they certainally look the part)but i am surprised their times are similar to a 335i as the tt engine is around 190 kw. I have driven an A4 3.2 and it does not give you the push into the seat affect.
Also drove the Merc c350 200kw which did not feel like 200kw but worse is the auto gearbox. So slow, if travelling behind a slow car in i believe 7th gear and wish to overtake the kickdown; well you can have a shave and eat a cut lunch waiting for it to go.
recruiter is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      02-06-2007, 03:06 AM   #3
scheps
Lieutenant
 
Drives: TTMK2
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Aus, Brisbane

Posts: 402
iTrader: (0)

i found on the 3.2 a standing start was quite slow to respond to flooring whereas the 2.0T was rather responsive. I guess thats why teh reviews say its more fun to drive. it seems more responsive. I felt that the 1st 0-60 or 80 was faster than the 3.2, perhaps its because its a lighter car so it feels more "unstable".
scheps is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST