US was the only Nation to Veto this resolution condemning Israel

stylinexpat · 02-19-2011, 01:57 PM

Only one Nation out of all 15 Nations decided to Veto this resolution?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...13183320110219

Mahmood07 · 02-20-2011, 06:07 AM

surprising?

ghosthi32 · 02-20-2011, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahmood07

surprising?

mahmoood buddy pallll

Mahmood07 · 02-20-2011, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghosthi32

mahmoood buddy pallll

Just expressing some disappointment of Obamas foreign policy. Especially since he is totally ignoring what's happening in Bahrain

stylinexpat · 02-20-2011, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahmood07

Just expressing some disappointment of Obamas foreign policy. Especially since he is totally ignoring what's happening in Bahrain

Of course he is lol. They were pretty much forced to leave Saudi Arabia and their new base is in Bahrain. If they piss off the locals their new base will be at Sea

Sairafe · 02-20-2011, 04:03 PM

not suprising at all actually. US is Israel and vice versa.

Got Euro ? · 02-25-2011, 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sairafe

not suprising at all actually. US is Israel and vice versa.

+1 ... Israel can do as they please ANYTIME with ANYTHING..

ACZakka325i · 04-17-2011, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Euro ?

+1 ... Israel can do as they please ANYTIME with ANYTHING..

Not for very much longer, thankfully.

OldArmy · 04-17-2011, 07:55 PM

And giving up settlements will bring peace? Riiiight! Doesn't really matter what the Israelis offer, it will never be enough.

hks786 · 04-19-2011, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sairafe

not suprising at all actually. US is Israel and vice versa.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Euro ?

+1 ... Israel can do as they please ANYTIME with ANYTHING..

+1

hks786 · 04-19-2011, 08:48 AM

This sort of thing just highlights the corruption in the world today. 14 states were in favour of this resolution but the U.S with it's power to veto shot it down. wtf?

Also, the U.S are giving mixed messages. They say they acknowledge the illegal settlements BUT also say they don't want to intervene with resolutions and would rather deal with it through peace talks which are NON-BINDING and mean NOTHING.

However, when America does want to intervene with something like Libya they will move fast and pressure the whole world to take action. At the same time when the Ivory Coast and other places in the world were in a bad state America does NOTHING. It's all about politics and securing the best interests of their own country. Noone cares about civil wars really, or the poor, unless it directly impacts their own country (e.g OIL!)

schoy · 04-19-2011, 06:30 PM

^ I wouldn't characterize it as "corruption". Self-serving, yes, but not necessarily corrupt. This isn't a new concept, folks. The entire history of human government highlights our inherent self-serving nature.

hks786 · 04-19-2011, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schoy

^ I wouldn't characterize it as "corruption". Self-serving, yes, but not necessarily corrupt. This isn't a new concept, folks. The entire history of human government highlights our inherent self-serving nature.

Well, that's true. It just pisses me off lol. People are so quick to believe what they hear in the media but what they really need to understand is that EVERY country only cares about it's own interests and how to preserve those interests. We don't really get to hear everything going on behind closed doors.

scottwww · 05-11-2011, 12:52 AM

This is the first I have heard of this:

The Obama State Department is severely chastising the Israeli government for withholding tax revenues from the Palestinian Authority (PA). Israel is responding to the PA's creation of a "Unity Government" with Hamas; Hamas, whose stated mission is the destruction of Israel and has been designated by the U.S. as a "terrorist organization."

According to news reports, the Obama Administration says it's "premature" to stop funding the PA - that Israel and the United States should "wait and see" what kind of policies this new terrorist-related government puts in place.

link

Anything to it?

mikeinsf · 05-16-2011, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACZakka325i

Not for very much longer, thankfully.

I'd like to think this is true, why do you say? I don't consider Israel much of a friend to the US.

stylinexpat · 06-20-2011, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldArmy

And giving up settlements will bring peace? Riiiight! Doesn't really matter what the Israelis offer, it will never be enough.

mikeinsf · 06-20-2011, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottwww

This is the first I have heard of this:

Anything to it?

I hope so. It's about time we stopped being Israel's cover for all of the crap they pull.

Javi335 · 08-22-2011, 09:48 PM

meanwhile, "somewhere"....

the king of the north stalks

muahahahaha

E90SLAM · 08-23-2011, 11:46 AM

You Don't Mess with the Zohan

stylinexpat · 09-19-2011, 05:09 AM

If the US is really neutral in this case they should abstain from voting even though they should vote for a Palestinian State in the same way they voted for a Israeli state.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63794.html

hks786 · 09-19-2011, 05:27 AM

That will never happen. America and Israel work together and care only for their own interests. Infact you can include Britain in that too. Noone can do anything in the world without these powers having a say in it. No nuclear programme for Iran, but known nuclear weapons for Israel? No problem. Same with America and Britain. Bastards. They kill thousands in any lands that they wish in the name of a so-called "war on terror". Israel is a terrorist state IMO.

I hope Palestine get their statehood bid approved but even at that I don't think anything will change. America does not respect the sovereignty of any state. They will start wars wherever they wish and use the media to promote their lies.

02-19-2011, 01:57 PM	#1
stylinexpat Major 127 Rep 1,062 Posts Drives: Join Date: Aug 2008 iTrader: (0)	US was the only Nation to Veto this resolution condemning Israel Only one Nation out of all 15 Nations decided to Veto this resolution? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...13183320110219
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

02-20-2011, 06:07 AM	#2
Mahmood07 Captain 45 Rep 849 Posts Drives: E92 M3 + F85 X5M Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Boston->San Diego->Bahrain iTrader: (0)	surprising? __________________ ///M3 Mods: \| Eisenmann Race Exhaust \| Primary Cats Delete (TTP) \| ESS Tune \| 19" Advan RS \| Eibach Springs \| MS Air Filter \| BMW Perf. Spoiler \| BMW Perf. Splitters \| Euro LCI Tail lights \| Angel iBright v.3.0 \| 20% Tint \| Matte black Kidney Grills \| CF Side Gills \| Painted Reflectors \| Black M3 emblem
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-20-2011, 04:03 PM	#6
Sairafe Lieutenant 17 Rep 557 Posts Drives: ^ Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Irvine, California iTrader: (0)	not suprising at all actually. US is Israel and vice versa.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-17-2011, 07:55 PM	#9
OldArmy Lieutenant 29 Rep 522 Posts Drives: 2007 Z4 3.0si Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Central Virginia iTrader: (0)	And giving up settlements will bring peace? Riiiight! Doesn't really matter what the Israelis offer, it will never be enough.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-19-2011, 08:48 AM	#11
hks786 Major General 1137 Rep 5,366 Posts Drives: * Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: UK iTrader: (0)	This sort of thing just highlights the corruption in the world today. 14 states were in favour of this resolution but the U.S with it's power to veto shot it down. wtf? Also, the U.S are giving mixed messages. They say they acknowledge the illegal settlements BUT also say they don't want to intervene with resolutions and would rather deal with it through peace talks which are NON-BINDING and mean NOTHING. However, when America does want to intervene with something like Libya they will move fast and pressure the whole world to take action. At the same time when the Ivory Coast and other places in the world were in a bad state America does NOTHING. It's all about politics and securing the best interests of their own country. Noone cares about civil wars really, or the poor, unless it directly impacts their own country (e.g OIL!) __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-19-2011, 06:30 PM	#12
schoy First Lieutenant 173 Rep 369 Posts Drives: Melbourne Red E90 M3 Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: USA iTrader: (0)	^ I wouldn't characterize it as "corruption". Self-serving, yes, but not necessarily corrupt. This isn't a new concept, folks. The entire history of human government highlights our inherent self-serving nature.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2011, 12:52 AM	#14
scottwww Brigadier General 358 Rep 4,758 Posts Drives: 07 BMW 335i Cpe, 05 Mazda RX8 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: USA iTrader: (0)	This is the first I have heard of this: The Obama State Department is severely chastising the Israeli government for withholding tax revenues from the Palestinian Authority (PA). Israel is responding to the PA's creation of a "Unity Government" with Hamas; Hamas, whose stated mission is the destruction of Israel and has been designated by the U.S. as a "terrorist organization." According to news reports, the Obama Administration says it's "premature" to stop funding the PA - that Israel and the United States should "wait and see" what kind of policies this new terrorist-related government puts in place. link Anything to it?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-22-2011, 09:48 PM	#18
Javi335 Troll but nice 85 Rep 341 Posts Drives: 335i E92 Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Returning videotapes iTrader: (0)	meanwhile, "somewhere".... the king of the north stalks muahahahaha __________________ There was me, that is Alex, and my three droogs, that is Pete, Georgie, and Dim, and we sat in the Korova Milkbar trying to make up our rassoodocks what to do with the evening. The Korova milkbar sold milk-plus, milk plus vellocet or synthemesc or drencrom, which is what we were drinking. This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old ultra-violence. Last edited by Javi335; 08-22-2011 at 09:59 PM.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-23-2011, 11:46 AM	#19
E90SLAM Supreme Allied Commander 1242 Rep 61,542 Posts Drives: A BBS WHORE Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: . iTrader: (6) Garage List 2016 X3 xDrive28i [0.00] 2006 330i [4.67]	You Don't Mess with the Zohan __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-19-2011, 05:09 AM	#20
stylinexpat Major 127 Rep 1,062 Posts Drives: Join Date: Aug 2008 iTrader: (0)	If the US is really neutral in this case they should abstain from voting even though they should vote for a Palestinian State in the same way they voted for a Israeli state. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63794.html
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-19-2011, 05:27 AM	#21
hks786 Major General 1137 Rep 5,366 Posts Drives: * Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: UK iTrader: (0)	That will never happen. America and Israel work together and care only for their own interests. Infact you can include Britain in that too. Noone can do anything in the world without these powers having a say in it. No nuclear programme for Iran, but known nuclear weapons for Israel? No problem. Same with America and Britain. Bastards. They kill thousands in any lands that they wish in the name of a so-called "war on terror". Israel is a terrorist state IMO. I hope Palestine get their statehood bid approved but even at that I don't think anything will change. America does not respect the sovereignty of any state. They will start wars wherever they wish and use the media to promote their lies. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search