E90Post
 


Extreme Powerhouse
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion > Forbes top 15 cars to avoid... #1 = BMW 7 series



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-01-2015, 01:44 PM   #1
Andrew115
Major
Andrew115's Avatar
327
Rep
1,450
Posts

Drives: Silver Bullet
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Charlotte NC

iTrader: (0)

Forbes top 15 cars to avoid... #1 = BMW 7 series

Ouch. the 7 series takes their number 1 spot.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/ehmk4...-bmw-7-series/

1. BMW 7 Series

BMW’s flagship sedan seems to have lost its edge in recent years. It’s wrapped in languid styling and just doesn’t feel as sporty as it did in earlier renditions; an odd product lineup includes an expensive and not especially efficient gas-electric hybrid model. Consumer Reports takes the 7 Series to task for being “a ponderous, technology-laden vehicle with ungainly handling,” and is included in the publication’s lists of lowest-scoring cars, worst overall values and most expensive operating costs in its class. Not to pile on, but it also gets a rock-bottom resale value rating from ALG and a below average performance score from J.D. Power.
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2015, 02:05 PM   #2
GrantE83
Second Lieutenant
GrantE83's Avatar
United Kingdom
32
Rep
221
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 E83
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London, UK

iTrader: (0)

Can't say I'm suprised.
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2015, 02:32 PM   #3
SCOTT26
Major General
SCOTT26's Avatar
5299
Rep
5,824
Posts

Drives: A big F-off German Truck.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WORLDWIDE

iTrader: (0)

Its an old article relating to the F01 7er in which the all new 7er eclipses that car.
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2015, 04:51 PM   #4
buddalun
Lieutenant Colonel
buddalun's Avatar
United_States
678
Rep
1,932
Posts

Drives: 911 x 2, Tesla M3P & MYP
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: USA

iTrader: (7)

It all started with Bangle...
Appreciate 1
      10-01-2015, 04:59 PM   #5
imserious
Major
412
Rep
1,049
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3 MR
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (4)

Bangle influenced some great designs (Z4, M3 ) and for better or worse influenced all of cardom design wise.

But agreed. The 7 series post bangle was a disaster. E38 managed to look athletic and tight even for a large sedan.
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2015, 05:18 PM   #6
C5driver
Major
C5driver's Avatar
3469
Rep
1,125
Posts

Drives: 55...just kidding.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: 33.6167° N, 117.8975° W

iTrader: (0)

Gary? Gary?
Appreciate 2
      10-01-2015, 05:25 PM   #7
rr006rbc
Colonel
1203
Rep
2,818
Posts

Drives: '23 M440i GC
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (38)

The first generation 2009 750Li and 750i were tragic..this I can attest to.
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2015, 08:20 PM   #8
Outrun
Second Lieutenant
65
Rep
206
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW M235i xDrive
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ohio

iTrader: (1)

I read the article and wasn't surprised...I doubt it will hurt sales though. My impression is that 7 series sell based on it's luxury status and the "prestige" factor....not because of great handling, stellar performance, or exciting body design.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 07:13 AM   #9
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16870
Rep
18,554
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

BMW sells about 10,000 7-series a year in the USA, who gives a shit.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 1
      10-03-2015, 07:14 AM   #10
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16870
Rep
18,554
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTT26 View Post
Its an old article relating to the F01 7er in which the all new 7er eclipses that car.
The point still being the F01 7-Series sucks...

So here are some quotes from Car and Driver on the new 7-series:

"The brakes are strong and progressive, but the pedal is rather soft—and got softer as the laps progressed. The steering is responsive and linear but light on feel, which engineers tell us is intentional, as the typical 7-series customer finds the little twitches and tugs emblematic of good steering to be annoying. Makes sense to us: Long-wheelbase luxury barges are parked on the other side of the pit wall. Even this one was competent but not thrilling. It will do what the driver asks of it, but we never stopped wondering why we were asking it to do those things."

"In Comfort Plus, the squishiest of the suspension settings, the 7-series surrenders to a surprisingly Lincoln-like float, heeling over in turns and generally betraying all of the brand’s core beliefs."

"We have seen the future, and it is frivolous."

So these car behaviors are what Cadillac once offered as the standard offering for its sedans, light and numb steering and soft suspension; Lexus provides the same as does Mercedes. Maybe these companies had it right in the first place...

By using carbon fiber reinforcements in various places in the chassis, BMW was able to drop 190 pounds total from the new 7 as compared to the old F01 chassis (actually only 88 pounds from the body-in-white). GM managed to drop 370 pounds total vehicle weight from the new Volt vs. the Gen I version. The Volt is not near the size of the 7 Series (i.e. less mass to start with to remove) and uses zero carbon fiber. BMW increased the MSRP of the new 7, GM reduced the MSRP of the Volt Gen II. I'm not comparing the Volt to the 7 obviously, but I am making example of engineering prowess; BMW doesn't own it exclusively is the point.

And just to be a bit more of an ass... here's some news about the Cadillac CT6 from Car and Driver (sorry it's raining here today - nothing else to do...)

"Impressively, the CT6’s body is 44 pounds lighter than the CTS’s, according to Mack. That’s thanks to a determined program to “lightweight” the car. Yes, Cadillac uses lightweight as a verb. GM employs 13 aluminum structural castings plus stamped-aluminum bodywork to get there. The company takes an agnostic approach to materials, however, using a fair amount of steel in the passenger cell for its superior sound-deadening properties, says Mack, adding that an aluminum structure would require so much insulation that the weight savings would be minimal. Because the new car will carry more standard equipment than the CTS, its curb weight should wind up about the same as the smaller car’s, at something like 3900 pounds."

GM increased the CT6's wheelbase by 7.8 inches over the CTS (platform) and reduced the overall weight between the two versions of the chassis, the CT6 being lighter than the shorter CTS. All without using carbon fiber and the resultant expense of it. And please don't confuse the carbon fiber used in aircraft and race cars to that of "low-cost" high-rate production parts used in the new 7. The new 7 uses "cast" CF sheets, not autoclave-cured (i.e. vacuum and nitrogen environment) high strength CF parts used in the manufacture of aircraft and race car tubs. Not all carbon fiber is the same...
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."

Last edited by Efthreeoh; 10-03-2015 at 09:59 AM..
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 07:34 AM   #11
sygazelle
Brigadier General
11033
Rep
3,402
Posts

Drives: 2014 328i M-Sport, 2019 X5 40i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by imserious View Post
Bangle influenced some great designs (Z4, M3 ) and for better or worse influenced all of cardom design wise.
You can't be serious
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 07:41 AM   #12
sygazelle
Brigadier General
11033
Rep
3,402
Posts

Drives: 2014 328i M-Sport, 2019 X5 40i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddalun View Post
It all started with Bangle...

Bangles designs certainly polarized.

Personally, I think he was an arrogant idiot who wanted to make a name for himself and shake things up. He certainly accomplished that goal, but not in a good way as far as I'm concerned. The 7ers under his watch were ridiculous. The E60 5er looked like it was designed by three committees that didn't talk to each other.

The new 7 looks great to me. It is finally rid of Bangle's influence.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 10:48 AM   #13
Squddie
Second Lieutenant
Squddie's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
290
Posts

Drives: E89 Z4
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bahston

iTrader: (0)

The F01 actually handles great, not just for a car its size. The one I drove was better than even a 6-series, not to mention the average F10.

Reliability of the F01 is for sure better than the E65, if it wasn't for everybody's N63 not-a-recall recall it would be reasonable.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 01:28 PM   #14
Ezio
Brigadier General
Ezio's Avatar
United_States
380
Rep
3,934
Posts

Drives: 2023 Alfa Romeo, 2023 m240i
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MI

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sygazelle View Post
Bangles designs certainly polarized.

Personally, I think he was an arrogant idiot who wanted to make a name for himself and shake things up. He certainly accomplished that goal, but not in a good way as far as I'm concerned. The 7ers under his watch were ridiculous. The E60 5er looked like it was designed by three committees that didn't talk to each other.

The new 7 looks great to me. It is finally rid of Bangle's influence.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 06:14 PM   #15
Lucky13
Lucky13
United_States
211
Rep
1,762
Posts

Drives: 2014 M235 manual, 2020 X3 30X
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Columbia, S.C.

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
The point still being the F01 7-Series sucks...

So here are some quotes from Car and Driver on the new 7-series:

"The brakes are strong and progressive, but the pedal is rather soft—and got softer as the laps progressed. The steering is responsive and linear but light on feel, which engineers tell us is intentional, as the typical 7-series customer finds the little twitches and tugs emblematic of good steering to be annoying. Makes sense to us: Long-wheelbase luxury barges are parked on the other side of the pit wall. Even this one was competent but not thrilling. It will do what the driver asks of it, but we never stopped wondering why we were asking it to do those things."

"In Comfort Plus, the squishiest of the suspension settings, the 7-series surrenders to a surprisingly Lincoln-like float, heeling over in turns and generally betraying all of the brand’s core beliefs."

"We have seen the future, and it is frivolous."

So these car behaviors are what Cadillac once offered as the standard offering for its sedans, light and numb steering and soft suspension; Lexus provides the same as does Mercedes. Maybe these companies had it right in the first place...

By using carbon fiber reinforcements in various places in the chassis, BMW was able to drop 190 pounds total from the new 7 as compared to the old F01 chassis (actually only 88 pounds from the body-in-white). GM managed to drop 370 pounds total vehicle weight from the new Volt vs. the Gen I version. The Volt is not near the size of the 7 Series (i.e. less mass to start with to remove) and uses zero carbon fiber. BMW increased the MSRP of the new 7, GM reduced the MSRP of the Volt Gen II. I'm not comparing the Volt to the 7 obviously, but I am making example of engineering prowess; BMW doesn't own it exclusively is the point.

And just to be a bit more of an ass... here's some news about the Cadillac CT6 from Car and Driver (sorry it's raining here today - nothing else to do...)

"Impressively, the CT6’s body is 44 pounds lighter than the CTS’s, according to Mack. That’s thanks to a determined program to “lightweight” the car. Yes, Cadillac uses lightweight as a verb. GM employs 13 aluminum structural castings plus stamped-aluminum bodywork to get there. The company takes an agnostic approach to materials, however, using a fair amount of steel in the passenger cell for its superior sound-deadening properties, says Mack, adding that an aluminum structure would require so much insulation that the weight savings would be minimal. Because the new car will carry more standard equipment than the CTS, its curb weight should wind up about the same as the smaller car’s, at something like 3900 pounds."

GM increased the CT6's wheelbase by 7.8 inches over the CTS (platform) and reduced the overall weight between the two versions of the chassis, the CT6 being lighter than the shorter CTS. All without using carbon fiber and the resultant expense of it. And please don't confuse the carbon fiber used in aircraft and race cars to that of "low-cost" high-rate production parts used in the new 7. The new 7 uses "cast" CF sheets, not autoclave-cured (i.e. vacuum and nitrogen environment) high strength CF parts used in the manufacture of aircraft and race car tubs. Not all carbon fiber is the same...
Whenever someone quotes what GM has done they immediately lose me. Just what Cadillac needs is a CT6 when the year old CTS is down 40% in sales, I guess they just want to totally kill it which is fine. Every GM car except Corvette is down in sales ytd as of about a month ago. Without trucks GM is DOA like Fiat/Chrysler, GM makes what 3% on their vehicles. Use another respected brand as an example and I might follow what your trying to say.
__________________
1995 325i, 1996 328ci, 1997 528i, 1997 Z3 2.8, 2000 528i, 2001 X5 3.0, 2001 330i Convertible, 2002 M3 Convertible, 2003 M3 Coupe, 2004 M3 Coupe, 2004 Z4 3.0, 2004 X3 3.0, 2007 X3 3.0, 2007 335i Convertible, 2013 X1 28 sdrive, 2014 M235 manual, 2020 X3 30i Xdrive
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 06:22 PM   #16
Fundguy1
Major General
Fundguy1's Avatar
2031
Rep
8,339
Posts

Drives: 335 e93
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Orlando, fl

iTrader: (0)

Keep dumping money into the I cars and neglecting the bread and butter. Go BMW. Where's my CSL?
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 07:59 PM   #17
Chihuahua
Brigadier General
Chihuahua's Avatar
3987
Rep
3,158
Posts

Drives: E30 329iS, E65 Alpina B7
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ATL

iTrader: (0)

Meh, whatevs. This article is old, and the 7 series hasn't done well with holding its value since the E32. No one buys a 7 series for the handling aspect either.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 08:22 PM   #18
Haywood
I know a thing or 2 about a thing or 2...
Haywood's Avatar
3099
Rep
3,470
Posts

Drives: E36 M3 Coupe, e39 M5, i3s
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: LI, NY

iTrader: (11)

Garage List
2003 BMW e39 M5  [0.00]
1997 BMW e36 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by C5driver View Post
Gary? Gary?
Agreed. It's all Gary's fault.
__________________
2019 Imperial Blue Metallic i3s BEV
2003 Le Mans Blue e39 M5 Dinan S1
1997 Alpine White e36 M3 (the old gal)
2013 Mineral White e92 M3 (sold )
2014 Carbon Black 650i M-sport (sold)
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2015, 05:20 AM   #19
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16870
Rep
18,554
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky13 View Post
Whenever someone quotes what GM has done they immediately lose me. Just what Cadillac needs is a CT6 when the year old CTS is down 40% in sales, I guess they just want to totally kill it which is fine. Every GM car except Corvette is down in sales ytd as of about a month ago. Without trucks GM is DOA like Fiat/Chrysler, GM makes what 3% on their vehicles. Use another respected brand as an example and I might follow what your trying to say.
Ignorance is bliss my friend. Sorry that I use facts to point out that BMW is not the king of automotive engineering. They sure make it sound great, don't they? If GM is so bad, why does BMW source transmissions from it? Why are the N52 coils Delphi parts. Whenever I see fanboyz touting BMWs engineering prowess I'm unimpressed. It can't make a high pressure fuel pump to save its life. Its direct injection engines need the valves cleaned every 50,000 miles. It makes a car that just overheats when the electric fuel pump goes tits-up without warning. It uses a oil change monitor algorithm that is purposefully designed to go defunct after 186,000 miles. It produces cars that the subframes crack, I can go on and on if you like. Practically every owner is scared to keep their BMW past the warranty period. To build the next gen Z4 it needs to get help from Toyota. Just 5 years ago BMW said it doesn't have to platform share between products as all other manufacturers do, now go look at the 1 series (a FWD mini), and Rolls (7 Series), and now the Toyota Z4/Surpra. I have a co-worker that has an E46 convertible he hasn't seen for 3 months because it has a drivers-side airbag that can unexpectedly blowup and send shrapnel into his brain. BMW won't let him drive it. He's not had it all summer - nice.

GM is the second largest car company in the world. BMW is like 13th. Their cars rank average to below average in reliability and build quality (about where GM is). 98% of the people buying a 5 or 7 series wouldn't know the difference if the badge on the CTS (or upcoming CT6) read B-M-W. The CTS-V smokes the M5. The ATS-V walks away from the M3. LOL
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."

Last edited by Efthreeoh; 10-04-2015 at 05:28 AM..
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2015, 08:05 AM   #20
Ali Shiralian
Lieutenant Colonel
Ali Shiralian's Avatar
Canada
813
Rep
1,986
Posts

Drives: 2014 335i xdrive, 2014 X5 3.5d
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Owen sound, Ontario, canada

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
Ignorance is bliss my friend. Sorry that I use facts to point out that BMW is not the king of automotive engineering. They sure make it sound great, don't they? If GM is so bad, why does BMW source transmissions from it? Why are the N52 coils Delphi parts. Whenever I see fanboyz touting BMWs engineering prowess I'm unimpressed. It can't make a high pressure fuel pump to save its life. Its direct injection engines need the valves cleaned every 50,000 miles. It makes a car that just overheats when the electric fuel pump goes tits-up without warning. It uses a oil change monitor algorithm that is purposefully designed to go defunct after 186,000 miles. It produces cars that the subframes crack, I can go on and on if you like. Practically every owner is scared to keep their BMW past the warranty period. To build the next gen Z4 it needs to get help from Toyota. Just 5 years ago BMW said it doesn't have to platform share between products as all other manufacturers do, now go look at the 1 series (a FWD mini), and Rolls (7 Series), and now the Toyota Z4/Surpra. I have a co-worker that has an E46 convertible he hasn't seen for 3 months because it has a drivers-side airbag that can unexpectedly blowup and send shrapnel into his brain. BMW won't let him drive it. He's not had it all summer - nice.

GM is the second largest car company in the world. BMW is like 13th. Their cars rank average to below average in reliability and build quality (about where GM is). 98% of the people buying a 5 or 7 series wouldn't know the difference if the badge on the CTS (or upcoming CT6) read B-M-W. The CTS-V smokes the M5. The ATS-V walks away from the M3. LOL
Ok then, what are you doing with two BMWs in your garage, get what you say is good....Caddy or perhaps a Volt?
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2015, 10:00 AM   #21
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16870
Rep
18,554
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Shiralian View Post
Ok then, what are you doing with two BMWs in your garage, get what you say is good....Caddy or perhaps a Volt?
I have 3 BMWs. I've test driven both the Volt and ATS extensively and would buy either if the time was right. I also have a Hummer in my fleet, so I do own a GM product.

My main priority is buying a car that provides the best economical transportation (total lifecycle cost), so that means starting off with the lowest purchase price commensurate with a car that fits my driving style and comfort since I'm in it 20 hours a week, and decent fuel consumption. I'm not driven by brand loyalty nor brand image. I was even close to buying a Ford Focus Titanium at one point.

In late 2014 (August- December) I was close to getting an ATS or a Volt, but the E90 at 289K keeps running and is still economically repairable, so I pushed off a purchase. It is very difficult to find a manual transmission'ed car and I couldn't find an ATS with little options (i.e. a low price). So I ended up buying a Z4 Coupe in December '14 for $26K in preparation of taking the E90 off the road for a few months to go through a bunch of stuff on it. The issue is I drive about 35,000 miles a year commuting to work. I can't bring myself to buy a new $40K car and run the crap out of it, which is all I could find in an ATS without ordering one. My main priority is buying a car that provides the best economical transportation (total lifecycle cost) so that means starting off with the lowest purchase price commensurate with a car that fits my driving style and comfort since I'm in it 20 hours a week. The new turbo BMW platform doesn't speak longevity to me.

I also was close to getting a Volt instead, but it was dependent upon my office building getting charging stations, which they eventually did in late January. Had the building management been transparent about when the stations were being installed (they said in budget year 2015 - could have been anywhere between January and this December) I would have passed on the Z4 and got the Volt. To make the Volt viable I need to charge it at work and at home. I found the Z4 goofing around one day on CarMax. The Z4 was very low mileage 22K and too hard to pass up, even more considering it has the same basic drivetrain as the E90, so my maintenance and repair support is easy because I don't need to buy any extra tools or scan equipment.

Both are good cars. The ATS drives far better than an F30. The Volt is built very well and gets the mileage(s) it advertises (unlike some other hybrids). To be honest, a turbo engine'd car is not my preference for longevity, since I need to get 200,000 to 250,000 miles out of a car. BMWs do have their issues, but all the ones I've had easily hit 200K.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2015, 10:13 AM   #22
Ali Shiralian
Lieutenant Colonel
Ali Shiralian's Avatar
Canada
813
Rep
1,986
Posts

Drives: 2014 335i xdrive, 2014 X5 3.5d
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Owen sound, Ontario, canada

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
I have 3 BMWs. I've test driven both the Volt and ATS extensively and would buy either if the time was right. I also have a Hummer in my fleet, so I do own a GM product.

My main priority is buying a car that provides the best economical transportation (total lifecycle cost), so that means starting off with the lowest purchase price commensurate with a car that fits my driving style and comfort since I'm in it 20 hours a week, and decent fuel consumption. I'm not driven by brand loyalty nor brand image. I was even close to buying a Ford Focus Titanium at one point.

In late 2014 (August- December) I was close to getting an ATS or a Volt, but the E90 at 289K keeps running and is still economically repairable, so I pushed off a purchase. It is very difficult to find a manual transmission'ed car and I couldn't find an ATS with little options (i.e. a low price). So I ended up buying a Z4 Coupe in December '14 for $26K in preparation of taking the E90 off the road for a few months to go through a bunch of stuff on it. The issue is I drive about 35,000 miles a year commuting to work. I can't bring myself to buy a new $40K car and run the crap out of it, which is all I could find in an ATS without ordering one. My main priority is buying a car that provides the best economical transportation (total lifecycle cost) so that means starting off with the lowest purchase price commensurate with a car that fits my driving style and comfort since I'm in it 20 hours a week. The new turbo BMW platform doesn't speak longevity to me.

I also was close to getting a Volt instead, but it was dependent upon my office building getting charging stations, which they eventually did in late January. Had the building management been transparent about when the stations were being installed (they said in budget year 2015 - could have been anywhere between January and this December) I would have passed on the Z4 and got the Volt. To make the Volt viable I need to charge it at work and at home. I found the Z4 goofing around one day on CarMax. The Z4 was very low mileage 22K and too hard to pass up, even more considering it has the same basic drivetrain as the E90, so my maintenance and repair support is easy because I don't need to buy any extra tools or scan equipment.

Both are good cars. The ATS drives far better than an F30. The Volt is built very well and gets the mileage(s) it advertises (unlike some other hybrids). To be honest, a turbo engine'd car is not my preference for longevity, since I need to get 200,000 to 250,000 miles out of a car. BMWs do have their issues, but all the ones I've had easily hit 200K.
I agree with you on the brand loyalty part. I have various brand in my garage and BMW happens to be two of them. I do however look for workmanship and what a car is capable to do for me. I've had GM cars in the past and due to some poor workmanship and lousy dealer service decided not to get another one. I too test drove the ATS and found the F30 to be superior in every aspect (free four year maintanance one of them), and to this day I haven't had a single issue with it. Now I don't drive as much as you do but driving a car that makes me feel good while I drive it matters to me. Saving gas, not so much.. But to each it's own I guess.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST