|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
E90 330i "Meaty, Beefy" wheel and tire set up. 9.5 fronts**HELP**
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-14-2012, 11:12 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 113
Posts |
E90 330i "Meaty, Beefy" wheel and tire set up. 9.5 fronts**HELP**
Gentleman,
I am not a fan of the "stretched" fitment and such, i like meat on my wheels and i want to achieve this with my 330i, the car it self is at stock height (sports suspension) and i plan on leaving it like this. My question is can i run a square set up with 9.5s all around with some beefy tires? is any one running a similar st up at stock Sport height? Any input on this would be greatly appreciated. PS: i will be ditching the run flat tires... how are you guys coping with this... do you have a spare? a bunch of "fix a flat"? What is your solution. Thank you in advance. |
12-14-2012, 11:30 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
32
Rep 447
Posts |
Can't comment on the first question, but as for the second - I'm running non-runflat winters at the moment, with $12 of insurance-in-a-can in the trunk space where a spare tire would normally go. Hopefully I never need it, but I helped someone ELSE use one years ago, and it seemed to do the job, so I'm not too worried. Runflats? Rigid, noisy, expensive, hard to mount and you can't fix'em. I say go with whatever you want. I've had 2 flat tires in 24 years of driving. I'll take those odds.
Sweet pic btw. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2012, 11:34 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
186
Rep 4,732
Posts
Drives: Alpine White '13 550i
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tarzana, CA
|
Wish I went with the "meaty/beefy" look....pot holes are a bitch and I want race car!
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2012, 04:44 AM | #5 | |
Colonel
2028
Rep 2,672
Posts |
Quote:
This is a great question! Most members on this forum focus on stance vs performance and daily driving qualities. Short answer: YES (this is what I am doing now): 1. Apex ARC-8 9.5/17 square wheels (17 Lbs!!!) and super concave 2. Vorshlag camber plates (required to fit front tires) 3. 5mm spacer (Turner) 4. Tires 255/40 (PS2 is an excellent choice) I drove my friends square 17" set-up at one of HPDE events and it is a night and day difference compared to stock 18" RFT set-up. You need to run camber up front of around -1.8-2.2 without impact to uneven tire wear. These cars are designed to run with camber except that BMW did not include it out of the factory in the front. You will notice a significant difference if you decrease ~40 lbs of unsprung weight, one of the best mods that you can do that affects handling, braking, acceleration and damping if you are not updating suspension bits. Also, 17" tires are cheaper than 18s and 19s. If you can, I would highly recommend to get M3 front bits as they sharpen steering with non-rft tires. I think the bushings on stock arms are too soft for non-rft tires. You can get TRW parts for 1/2 cost and it is the same design, they make M3 parts (check ECS tuning site). There is a group buy going on now for Apex 17" wheels and I would get a set if you want to maximize performance. Excellent value! The full story is available in the tracking section: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=651864 http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=770096 GL Last edited by Mavus; 12-15-2012 at 04:52 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2012, 01:51 PM | #6 | |
Private First Class
8
Rep 113
Posts |
Quote:
i really dont want to go with 17s 18 is the smallest i want to go. i have the 162s right now, i dont want to go any smaller. bump for more comments, sugestions and most importantly Pics! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2012, 08:34 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
107
Rep 361
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2012, 09:16 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
89
Rep 3,732
Posts
Drives: BMW S1000XR
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Good luck...I cant comment on the beefy wheels but I agree they look better than being too stretched. I always by a spare front wheel to be safe since there are so many pot-holes in the Chicago area.
__________________
BMWCCA member |
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2012, 07:23 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
127
Rep 1,799
Posts |
Quote:
Whether or not that the opposite of what he wants to do those are his choices if he wants to run a 19x9.5 in the front. What do you want me tell him he can run a 265 when he cant? I'm running 9.5 so i know. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2012, 12:15 PM | #11 |
Eating M3s for breakfast
46
Rep 299
Posts |
It all comes down to offset really. That being said you would have to find the highest offset possible that will still clear your suspension and brakes in the width of your choice. When that is done you'll probably get away with a fat 245 on the front, like a Nitto Invo. Same procedure for the rears and a fender roll, and you should be set up nicely.
I would stay away from 20-30 offset in the front. Most likely you will be looking at a high 30s (maybe 40?) offset in the front. This is a total guesstimation, I would be very interested if somebody would actually do some measurements and confirm the meatiest/widest rim setup possible on our cars with only slight modification. Personally, I'd like to rock a 295 in the rear someday Edit: Apex offers the EC-7 in 18x9.0 +31 in their lineup for E90/92, that must be the wheel you need for your unquenchable thirst for beef. Check out their GB thread there is a pic of the setup. Last edited by guru_method; 12-17-2012 at 11:04 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2012, 01:21 PM | #12 |
NeedsMoarBoost
42
Rep 528
Posts |
whats the most aggressive offset than can be run up front on a 9.5?
+22 wont work with a 235?
__________________
08 135i 6m - 12.1@120.2 2.0 60ft - JB4/Meth - SOLD
09 335i e92 Mtech - RB FBO |
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2012, 02:14 PM | #13 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
1427
Rep 2,663
Posts |
Quote:
Satin Black 18x9" ET31 EC-7's with 245/35/18 tires.
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers Last edited by ApexWheels; 12-20-2012 at 05:24 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2012, 04:53 PM | #14 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
2038
Rep 25,989
Posts |
In my personal opinion, 265's look perfect on a 9.5 wheel. If you want to go for the 'beefy' or 'meaty' look, why not go for a narrower wheel and a tire that won't stretch.
__________________
VMR|Wheels | 714.442.7916 |
sales@velocitymotoring.com | www.velocitymotoring.com | facebook | flickr | Instagram |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2012, 09:29 PM | #16 | |
Colonel
2028
Rep 2,672
Posts |
Quote:
I think you are confused...if you want meat you need 17s end of story. If you have 18s and go with 245 and 265 they will not look beefy. You can get 235 and 255 PSS or PS2 tires on 18s and you are close to the max unless you mod the body. It is impossible to fit beefy 18s on e90 non-m stock. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2012, 02:06 PM | #17 | |
DIYER
614
Rep 5,521
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
JB4 G5, Stage 3 LPFP, Stage 2 MOTIV PI, VM 6466 ST, Custom OCC W/ SS lines, ER FMIC, ER CP W/HKS BOV, M3 control arms, M3 guide rods, M3 upper links, M3 front & rear sway-bars, HPA rear toe arms, Wavetrac LSD, HPF Gen 2, DEFIV kit, KW clubsport, Delrin solid SF bushings, stoptech rotors, Rogue Tranny Mounts, 1M bumper, M3 CF hood, M3 fenders, M3 OEM sideskirts, Mtech rear bumper, CSL trunk, MORR VS8.2 rims 245/295
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
Bookmarks |
|
|