|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Voided warranty
|
|
11-16-2011, 03:10 PM | #23 |
Putting more gas in the car...
0
Rep 36
Posts |
The dealer CAN see if you have exceeded the top speed set by the limiter of the car. Cobb, to my knowledge, does not remove that when you remove the tune. So in the case of a blown engine, and they start digging around to find you were doing 180mph, then they could certainly make a case that your engine was modified in such a way that allowed it to blow. Removing the tune removes the top speed limiter default, but I'd love to hear directly from Cobb if they reset any historical data stored that shows your cars speed.
__________________
2008 BMW 535iA | Cobb Stg2+ | Injen Intake | AR Catted DP's | CP-E FMIC | Turbosmart DV's | ER Charge Pipe
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2011, 03:30 PM | #24 |
Colonel
226
Rep 2,387
Posts |
I think the point about leaving mods on vs taking them off for a dealer visit is, while you may get service and even minor warranty work done with no problems, your VIN may go into a "detected tune/mod" database so that in the future if major $$$ things grenade, BMWNA can if they wish deny coverage (not the dealer nor even your friendly SA has any say in it).
I was told explicitly that a Dinan tune (installed by the dealership's own dinan franchise) would void the existing CPO automatically. I.e. the moment BMWNA was notified of Dinan tune installed, no more CPO. Car was then still under original manuf. warranty. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2011, 09:43 PM | #25 |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 378
Posts |
incorrect hpfp was NOT recalled for ALL n54's, my car has had neither recall on injectors or hpfp yet ive had BOTH go out on me
__________________
Current: 2012 Mustang GT 5.0(Brembo Package, Jon Lund tune, steeda 101mm CAI, roush axlebacks, offroad xpipe)
Current: 2008 Honda CBR1000RR (Jardine Slip-On, PC III, dyno tuned at 173 rwhp) Sold: 2008 BMW 335i(JB4, Stett CP/Tial BOV,BMS DCI, Raceland Catless DP) |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 09:18 AM | #26 |
First Lieutenant
56
Rep 376
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 09:46 AM | #27 |
Lieutenant Colonel
76
Rep 1,883
Posts |
A long time ago (prior to injector recall) I had brought my car in several times for cold start misfires. The dumb tech couldn't figure out what the problem was, even though I told them several times that I was positive it was the injectors. I brought my car in stock, but left my meth lines under the car and controller in the trunk under the mat. They had no problems with this until about the 4th time I brought my car in for cold start misfires (they kept saying it was normal - complete BS). At this time they said they refused to do any work cuz I had modified my car. Basically, they were using it as an excuse to not fix their multiple failures as a mechanic. My warranty was "voided". I ended up replacing the injectors myself and lo and behold problem solved.
After that I just started bringing my car in fully modded, FBO + meth. I have had maintenance done, front sub-frame replaced, power steering pulley replaced, hpfp replaced, injector recall checked out, windshield replaced, radiator vent hose replaced, and some other basic stuff I can't remember. All of this stuff can be argued that my mods wouldn't have affected it. I doubt they would've replaced blown turbos or damaged block had that ever happened though.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 09:49 AM | #28 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
76
Rep 1,883
Posts |
Quote:
Injector recall is based on a certain batch of injectors. I've replaced bad injectors post recall that BMW said didn't need replacing.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 11:41 AM | #29 | |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 378
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2012 Mustang GT 5.0(Brembo Package, Jon Lund tune, steeda 101mm CAI, roush axlebacks, offroad xpipe)
Current: 2008 Honda CBR1000RR (Jardine Slip-On, PC III, dyno tuned at 173 rwhp) Sold: 2008 BMW 335i(JB4, Stett CP/Tial BOV,BMS DCI, Raceland Catless DP) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 01:34 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
76
Rep 1,883
Posts |
Quote:
AFAIK, The injector recall is based on a barcode # on the actual injector. They physically take out each injector to see if they fall under the recall. So they can't find it out through VIN. This is why some people only get a few injectors replaced and not all. It was a batch that probably was out of tolerance. As far HPFP, bringing up your VIN will show information on build date and whether your car has already had the replacement. This could tell you whether you have the bad part# of the HPFP. I would be surprised if any n54 prior to 2010 is still on the original HPFP and doesn't have an open recall.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 07:26 PM | #31 | |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 378
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2012 Mustang GT 5.0(Brembo Package, Jon Lund tune, steeda 101mm CAI, roush axlebacks, offroad xpipe)
Current: 2008 Honda CBR1000RR (Jardine Slip-On, PC III, dyno tuned at 173 rwhp) Sold: 2008 BMW 335i(JB4, Stett CP/Tial BOV,BMS DCI, Raceland Catless DP) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 11:00 PM | #32 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
76
Rep 1,883
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 11:03 PM | #33 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
158
Rep 1,523
Posts |
Quote:
I'd like to check mine myself without going to the dealer. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2011, 11:30 PM | #34 | ||
Major
54
Rep 1,166
Posts |
Quote:
100000 this is what I have been worried about and what's holding me back from my Cobb purchase don't want the rev limiter set to 7200 over the factory 7000 can't they see that engine has been over reved that way thus meaning theres a tune even if the codes are cleared during the uninstall?
__________________
2008 Monaco Blue 335i | Terracotta | Premium | Auto | Comfort Access | Matte-black Grills | Carbon Fiber Splitters | 20% Tint | 1- point E9x Picture Game | Staggered 19' VMR V701 | Legal Disclaimer: My posts on this website cannot be held against me in any issues, such as warranty claims. |
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2011, 08:14 AM | #35 | |
Lieutenant
18
Rep 462
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2011, 09:05 AM | #36 | |
First Lieutenant
56
Rep 376
Posts |
Quote:
-Chris |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2011, 11:21 PM | #38 | |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 378
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2012 Mustang GT 5.0(Brembo Package, Jon Lund tune, steeda 101mm CAI, roush axlebacks, offroad xpipe)
Current: 2008 Honda CBR1000RR (Jardine Slip-On, PC III, dyno tuned at 173 rwhp) Sold: 2008 BMW 335i(JB4, Stett CP/Tial BOV,BMS DCI, Raceland Catless DP) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2011, 11:24 PM | #39 | |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 378
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2012 Mustang GT 5.0(Brembo Package, Jon Lund tune, steeda 101mm CAI, roush axlebacks, offroad xpipe)
Current: 2008 Honda CBR1000RR (Jardine Slip-On, PC III, dyno tuned at 173 rwhp) Sold: 2008 BMW 335i(JB4, Stett CP/Tial BOV,BMS DCI, Raceland Catless DP) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2011, 11:29 PM | #40 |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 369
Posts |
I think in one of the recent Cobb updates they removed the raised RPM limiter.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2011, 08:45 AM | #41 |
First Lieutenant
56
Rep 376
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2011, 09:39 AM | #42 |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 369
Posts |
I can't find a specific mention for it but before the v203 maps were released a few people were getting limp modes at the 7200 rev limiter and a few days later Cobb released 203 saying they adjusting shift points to make it smoother on an AT. Rob@Cobb said "The map changes are to the AT rev limits and how smooth the shifts are."
Also, all logs I've done stop at 7000 RPM. Reference post: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...46&postcount=7 Edit: Found it. If you look at the PDF for the v203 map notes "this update reverts the stock limiters to stock settings for AT vehicles" There you go. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2011, 09:41 AM | #43 | |
First Lieutenant
56
Rep 376
Posts |
Quote:
Great - thank you for that! -Chris |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2011, 12:01 PM | #44 |
Captain
22
Rep 647
Posts |
http://cobbtuning.com/info/?id=5894
If you look at the top of each map its says either stock rev limiter or raised rev limiter. The drive maps are the only ones that say stock. But i believe the rev limit is only raised on Manuel tranny's. I'm running stage 2+ sport with AT and haven't seen it rev past 7k rpms. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|