|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Anybody Suffering from T.I.C.?
|
|
11-26-2007, 02:40 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 125
Posts
Drives: 320d SE E91 Montego Blue (177)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff, WALES isn't it.
|
Anybody Suffering from T.I.C.?
OK, as i've just popped my cherry so to speak I thought it's time to post some drivel here with the rest of you (entertaining) wasters.
So, anybody here suffering with Torque Inferiority Complex? It's a real problem and i'm thinking of setting up some sort of self help group. This forum is a tonic in itself. Cheers |
11-26-2007, 02:41 PM | #2 | |
Major
33
Rep 1,386
Posts
Drives: Jaguar XF S
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Midlands
|
Quote:
__________________
Going out with a BAN now that the forum has become Chav Ville. Fair well the early adopters.
Jaguar XF 3.0D S Gone: E92 335d |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 02:47 PM | #4 | |
Colonel
103
Rep 2,292
Posts |
Quote:
Welcome to Carlos offtopic section.
__________________
Golf Ed35 Black with - Black Leather
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:10 PM | #5 | |
Major General
273
Rep 9,218
Posts |
Quote:
Brabus rocket 811 lb-ft / 1099 nm: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/to...rld-Record.htm JCB Diesel Max 1106 lb-ft / 1500 nm: http://www.jcbdieselmax.com/html/car.php?subsection=10 Wartsila-Sulzer RTA96-C 5,608,312 lb-ft / 7,603,862 nm: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/ |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:24 PM | #6 |
Colonel
128
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
Fingers crossed should have one of http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/to...z-SL-Class.htm these coming on the 8th
SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:31 PM | #7 | ||
Major General
191
Rep 6,110
Posts
Drives: Don't know yet!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:32 PM | #8 | |
Major General
273
Rep 9,218
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:36 PM | #9 |
Campervan man
94
Rep 2,667
Posts |
Er no, 520ft lb is more than enough!!!!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 03:44 PM | #10 |
Colonel
128
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
is that crank Oli, or wheel torque ?
SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 04:16 PM | #11 |
Captain
14
Rep 686
Posts
Drives: E93 320d M Sport, E81 116d SE
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Epsom UK
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2006 120d SE [0.00]
2007 335d A M Sport [0.00] 1998 M3 Evo [0.00] 2002 330d Sport [0.00] 2004 330d Sport [0.00] |
It would have to be crank as with the gearing a 335d sticks out over 1700 ftlbs out the back of the box in first gear. Regards Chris
__________________
Previously: 2007 335D MSport E90 Le Mans Blue, 2004 330D A Sport Silver Grey, 2002 330D A Sport Saphire Black, 2001 320D SE Touring Titanium Silver, 1998 M3 Evo Techno Violet, 1996 328i Sport Montreal Blue, 1994 325i Coupe Red, 1989 325i Sport 2 door Dolphin Grey,1986 325i SE 4 door Lachs
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 04:49 PM | #12 |
Major
33
Rep 1,386
Posts
Drives: Jaguar XF S
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Midlands
|
Power (hp) = [Torque (lb.ft) x Rotational Speed (RPM)] / 5252
Therefore low torque can be overcome by having high revs.
__________________
Going out with a BAN now that the forum has become Chav Ville. Fair well the early adopters.
Jaguar XF 3.0D S Gone: E92 335d |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2007, 05:09 PM | #13 |
Colonel
128
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
seems to work for the new M3
Talking of which Beemerbird, did you manage to get hold of an M3 for the dyno day ? SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 08:00 AM | #14 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
945
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Alrite Fat-GEEZE, i have plenty torque..
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 12:07 PM | #15 |
Campervan man
94
Rep 2,667
Posts |
God knows!!, Crank i presume, I am running the same map as Peppernick's car and he had his dyno'd at 350BHP and 520ft/lb, I believe?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 12:45 PM | #16 |
Major
33
Rep 1,386
Posts
Drives: Jaguar XF S
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Midlands
|
The poor E92 320i driver I dumped on the M42 tonight
__________________
Going out with a BAN now that the forum has become Chav Ville. Fair well the early adopters.
Jaguar XF 3.0D S Gone: E92 335d |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:08 PM | #17 | |
The Tarmac Terrorist
945
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Quote:
You cant get Accurate flywheel/crank figures on auto cars. Im guestimating on peppernicks figure of 270bhp (15% loss) 310.5bhp, sounds a bit low. but still a great improvement!! Nicks went from 222-270 at the wheels! I would say yours will be the same. Carlos
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:48 PM | #18 |
Campervan man
94
Rep 2,667
Posts |
Did those figures come from a write up from Nick?
Now doing my math's, if Peppernicks was 222BHP at the wheels standard, divide that into the flywheel ouput of 286BHP, give you a figure of 0.776 (drivetrain lossses). Divide the new figure of 270BHP, at the wheels, by 0.776 ( to allow for the drivetrain losses) give a flywheel figure of just under 348BHP!!!!! I am sure thats how you would work it out - correct me if Im wrong??
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:51 PM | #19 | |
The Tarmac Terrorist
945
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Quote:
Most 335is make 270at the wheels anyway, so your suggesting there all from the factory 348bhp, i dont think so... most are approx 310-315bhp at the fly! Carlos
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:51 PM | #20 | |
Private First Class
5
Rep 125
Posts
Drives: 320d SE E91 Montego Blue (177)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff, WALES isn't it.
|
Quote:
Not content with trashing us with hoooge torque numbers, now you've started attacking on the hbp numbers as well. Think how much luggage space i'll have with the seats folded down. Yawn.
__________________
Fatbloke
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:53 PM | #21 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
945
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2007, 01:56 PM | #22 |
Campervan man
94
Rep 2,667
Posts |
As if by magic!! http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57640
The 286 quoted at factory, is at the flywheel not the wheels, hence, 222 at the wheels means 23% losses due to transmission, that how if you follow my maths you get to 348 at the flywheel _ I am working it out on the figures that you posted - I presume they came from Nick
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|