|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Anyone have a dyno of just tune/intake/downpipe?
|
|
01-02-2013, 12:59 PM | #1 |
d[-_-]b
484
Rep 968
Posts |
Anyone have a dyno of just tune/intake/downpipe?
More specifically JB4/dp/intake map 2. I am ordering the Jb3-4 upgrade/intake/downpipe and would like to know roughly what my numbers would be, if anyone has one or has seen one please post it up.
Thanks! |
01-03-2013, 12:00 PM | #3 |
Private
5
Rep 99
Posts |
Long time ago, 304.2 HP / 355.5 FtLb on a DynoDynamics, 93 octane. Think that might have been Map 1, but that was with an intake, AR hi-flo catted DP, JB4 stg 2.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:18 PM | #5 |
Banned
46
Rep 1,556
Posts |
That would be equivalent to 350-360 crank depending on dyno, calibration, etc.
N55 drivers must accept the fact that these cars will be showing lower numbers than the N54s due to limitations related to the single turbo. I think 375ish crank will be the upper limit on a stock turbo. I know some tuners claim more but I am skeptical. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:25 PM | #6 |
d[-_-]b
484
Rep 968
Posts |
I put down this much with just jb3 stage 1 beta tune on a dynojet, was that dyno reading super low or what?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:27 PM | #7 | |
d[-_-]b
484
Rep 968
Posts |
Quote:
Here is me putting down almost identical numbers with the n55 beta tune: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:46 PM | #8 | |
Major
265
Rep 1,100
Posts
Drives: 90' s54 325i ; 93' carrera 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: palm beach gardens, fl
|
300/314 on a mustang dyno.
Quote:
Dyno numbers dont mean shit. Take it to the track. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:49 PM | #9 |
Banned
46
Rep 1,556
Posts |
Dynos vary, operators vary, weather varies...There are too many variables to really say the cars make "X horsepowers". All I know is that trap speeds in the quarter miles are a pretty damn good indication of power levels and these bolt-on N55s are basically making anywhere from 360 to 380 crank horsepower. There are a few outliers as with any platform but those are typical figures. Similarly, typical N54s are closer to 400 crank when looking at trap speeds. Trap speeds don't lie.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:52 PM | #10 | |
d[-_-]b
484
Rep 968
Posts |
Quote:
If two competing tuners have baseline + tune dynos that definitely means something aka which one has more gains. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 12:53 PM | #11 |
Banned
46
Rep 1,556
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 01:01 PM | #12 |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 222
Posts |
FYSA, dyno dynamics typically read lower than MD. A perfect example my evo ix on a mustang dyno put down 488/455 the same set-up with weather on a dyno dynamics put down 450/415
__________________
2007 BMW AW 335i
Mr.5 Intake///HKS SSQV///Race Land DP///JB4 10in. JBL W3///JBL GTO AMP///LC2i |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 01:07 PM | #13 |
Private First Class
9
Rep 101
Posts |
On map 2 340rw to 350rw, I don't know about torque but it's always higher than RW.
__________________
JB4 S2 ISO Map7, BMS Intake, BMS Chargepipe, BMS Downpipe, BMS OCC, Flex fuel wires.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 02:22 PM | #14 |
Colonel
241
Rep 2,705
Posts |
how much will these mods make on a n54 vs a n55? and the dyno shows you how much you make on paper, it doesnt add variables such as weight, conditions etc.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 05:11 PM | #15 | ||
Major
265
Rep 1,100
Posts
Drives: 90' s54 325i ; 93' carrera 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: palm beach gardens, fl
|
Quote:
Quote:
However, your second comment is wrong and why I made my statement to began with.....People that compare different dynos in different conditions are simply dumb....no other way to put it. Unless both are on the same dyno with the exact same calibrations with the exact same conditions you can compare....which is so unlikely its not even funny....play the lotto - you have a better chance! A dyno is good for comparing your OWN progress - and even using the same dyno can give you misleading results because of the hundreds of variables at play with air temp, motor temp, humidity, gas, etc I'll say what I said before....take it to the track...comparing dyno numbers that others achieved on a different dyno is a waste of time, in my opinion. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 05:17 PM | #16 | |
Major
265
Rep 1,100
Posts
Drives: 90' s54 325i ; 93' carrera 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: palm beach gardens, fl
|
Quote:
n55 6 spd jb4 map 5 ISO ar 4 inch kittenless AA Intercooler CPE CP BMS OCC BMS Intake Dinan Exhaust Flex Fuel Wires e30ish / 93 For sure well more than 375 crank. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 05:20 PM | #17 | |
Major
265
Rep 1,100
Posts
Drives: 90' s54 325i ; 93' carrera 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: palm beach gardens, fl
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 05:23 PM | #18 |
Major
265
Rep 1,100
Posts
Drives: 90' s54 325i ; 93' carrera 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: palm beach gardens, fl
|
There are two ways to look at accuracy: accuracy of the dyno itself, and the effects of introducing other variables outside the measurement system that can affect what the car is actually doing. As long as the dyno is properly used and calibrated, then all dynos are accurate for the conditions. The pitfall is trying to compare results across different platforms.
...... To the extent possible, you want to run multiple tests within a consistent shop environment, including similar ambient temperature and pressure. The more rigorous the setup, the more exacting the dyno calibration (on those load-sensitive dynos relying on brakes and absorbers), and the more controlled the overall shop environment, then the more repeatable the results, and the more suitable the facility is for measuring the effect of small incremental changes. Still, once you get down in the 5 percent range on the average chassis dyno in the average facility, it is difficult to evaluate whether the change is real or due to environmental transients. Read more: http://www.hotrod.com/techfaq/hrdp_0...#ixzz2GxRqCIRS |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 05:58 PM | #19 |
d[-_-]b
484
Rep 968
Posts |
There's nothing to read and you completely derailed this thread to prove a point that no one cares about. You should consider writing a book.
I asked if anyone has or has seen a dyno of an n55 with tune/intake/downpipe. What I plan to do with that information is for my personal use and I don't need you telling me its pointless or what I should be looking at instead. Your intentions may have been good but you come off sounding like an ass hat. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2013, 06:40 PM | #21 |
Private
5
Rep 99
Posts |
DynoDynamics always read really low, they call them the heartbreakers. The guys at the shop told me they typically read 12-15% lower than a dynojet, so that would be equivalent to approximately 355/410. But the only real way to tell how much of a gain you'll get is to compare vs runs on the same dyno with and without the modifications.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2013, 10:37 AM | #22 | |
First Lieutenant
99
Rep 370
Posts |
Quote:
I'm also interested in seeing this. No need to get into minutiae of dynos. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|