|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Dakota Leather Vs. Leatherette?
|
|
11-27-2012, 10:13 PM | #23 | |
Came to the N55 Darkside
1110
Rep 12,740
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2012, 11:10 PM | #24 |
Second Lieutenant
4
Rep 222
Posts |
Since I lost my last car in hurricane sandy the next one will have leatherette again. It was totally fine.
It's not real leather like Audi or Porsche, but neither is Dakota really. Thats plastic coated too. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2012, 11:18 PM | #25 |
Private
3
Rep 87
Posts |
06 E90 with leatherette, interior looks fine and is holding up real well. Leatherette is very durable, just the feeling and hefty look of leather isn't there; besides that, no negatives towards my bmw leatherette experience.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 05:22 AM | #26 | ||
Lieutenant
48
Rep 513
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Leather is no different, especially black leather. Super hot! I can't check out the car equipped w/ leatherette cuz it's in SoCal, and I'm in NorCal. Looking to purchase Pre-Owned. Also, on my E46, I thought I had dakota leather seats, but turned out I had leatherette. The leatherette did get hard over time even with conditioning. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 05:41 AM | #27 |
General
17165
Rep 18,677
Posts |
So I'll say this. I have beige leatherette in my car. I had to rebuild the driver's seat after 167,000 miles. I had to replace the upper seat (torso) cover as it had ripped at the side bolster seam due to my big ass rubbing on it upon entry. The bottom seat foam had deteriorated but the seat bottom cover was fine. I was going to replace the seat bottom cover too, but decided that it was still in good condition. So my car has a new torso cover and the orginal seat bottom cover (now at 196,000 miles) and the condition of both look the same.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 09:14 AM | #28 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 204
Posts |
I bought my car brand new and opted for leatherette over the Dakota leather. Sorry guys, but the so called "leather" that the Dakota is suppose to be is some cheap shit. My G35 coupe had better leather. The only leather I would have paid for if I didn't get the msport package would have been the individual crap. I plan to keep my 335d for a very long time and didn't want the seats to start looking like crap after the warranty ended. One thing that I do like on the Dakota is the double stitching...that almost most made me change my mind when ordering lol
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 09:29 AM | #29 | |
Brigadier General
55
Rep 3,606
Posts |
Quote:
push 1 finger into it. If it wrinkles around your finger its leather. Also, if bolsters are creased...its leather. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 10:28 AM | #30 | |
New Member
8
Rep 25
Posts
Drives: 2018 320i, 2007 328i, 2002 325
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Finger Lakes, New York
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 10:31 AM | #31 |
First Lieutenant
37
Rep 373
Posts |
I find it pretty funny that there are people slamming Leatherette, but then when asked how to determine if a car has leather vs leatherette, you have to point out stitching! I mean, if it's that bad, why is it so hard to tell the difference?
I had leatherette in my e46 and it was great. Now I have Dakota leather, and honestly it feels almost exactly the same. Maybe that's because the Dakota is just poor leather as others have pointed out. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 10:59 AM | #32 |
Major
347
Rep 1,076
Posts |
The wife has VW's version of Leatherette in her Touareg. We had leather in her old Ford Explorer and it was hard taking care of it with the kids...very hard. Leatherette is so easy to keep clean and wipe messes up on. Since I'm the one to keep her truck clean, I like that I don't have to condition 2 vehicles.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 11:09 AM | #33 |
Major
81
Rep 1,094
Posts
Drives: 2023 G87 M2 6Spd
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
|
I have Leatherette in my car. In comparison to the Nevada leather in my Dad's X5, it is less comfortable. The seat feels more "plasticky" rather than soft and comfy in the real leather seats. Leatherette does shine if you use it often without cleaning as well. Honestly, I do not believe that they should even be in any 3er.
Overall, I would definitely prefer real leather over leatherette any day.
__________________
[SOLD] 2007 E90 328i - Titanium Metallic l 19" VMR V710 l H&R Trak+ Spacers l M-Sport Rear Bumper l Mtech Rear Lip Spoiler l Hamann Front Lip l Eibach Sportline l AA N52 Signature Exhaust l OEM Blacklines l MTEC V3 AE l 6000K HID l Nokya 7000K Fogs l MTEC License Plate LED l Interior LED l 15% Tint l BlackVue DR380G-HD + PMP
2023 G87 M2 6Spd - HEA Package | OEM M Performance Carbon Wing |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 11:22 AM | #34 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 182
Posts |
My 05 325xi has leatherette and ~100k and still looks great, looks like its brand new.
My previous 06 330i had Dakota Leather and sold it with 65k and while the most of the interior was in great shape from not being used the driver seat had quiet a bit of wear. My current 2009 328xi with real leather still looks great, but I take very good care of it and I am careful entering and exiting the vehicle just for this reason. My moms 2011 X5 with leather has about 15k on it and her drivers side seat looks atrocious, and she is a very petite women. I really like how the leatherette holds up, and if purchasing a new car I wouldnt let that sway my decision making. However if I was ordering a new car I would get the real leather just for the added option of the PP. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 12:54 PM | #35 | |
Brigadier General
55
Rep 3,606
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 01:20 PM | #37 |
Captain
27
Rep 600
Posts |
I've had both in the Texas summer. Leather is hotter than leatherette for me.
Regardless, I totally like having leather better.
__________________
Jay (in San Antonio, TX)
2014 428i coupe, mineral gray metallic with black interior, black ash trim, luxury edition. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 01:34 PM | #38 |
Lieutenant
7
Rep 410
Posts |
Currently have black Dakota leather, breaking in nicely. Yes I will have to do maintenance to prevent cracking and drying.
Previously had the Artico leather on my Mercedes W204 C300; it remained very subtle, even in winter but I made the mistake of ordering the light grey interior. Cleaning it properly and safely was a little tricky. Felt more sticky in the summer. After 5 years in my Audi B6 A4, the leather around the seat region started to split and crack. Luckily, it was a leased vehicle and back it went. When building my next car, I will still order it with leather, personal preference, and in a dark color.
__________________
Organized crime is alive and well: It's called auto insurance
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 02:15 PM | #39 |
Major
78
Rep 1,127
Posts |
A lot of posts in this thread are not correct. Leatherette will crack, I know because my driver side bolster started to crack which then grew into a huge crack and I had the entire seat replaced by BMW. I am a fit 5'9'' individual, and was specifically told by the dealer that it is actually quite common in leatherette after 4-5 years.
So yes leatherette can crack, but it definitely is more durable than leather, doesn't need to be conditioned, and shows less visible wear over time.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 04:02 PM | #40 |
Lieutenant
287
Rep 398
Posts |
IMO I wasn't buying a BMW with leatherette. My black Dakota leather looks awesome after 27k from the original owner. I'd get it again.
__________________
2016 M4 MW/SS 6mt
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2012, 04:06 PM | #41 |
Private
8
Rep 86
Posts |
+1 on leatherette. I have beige leatherette, and everyone that gets into the car notes how nice the leather is. We have a toddler, and cleaning up cheerios, goldfish, spilled milk, decaying grapes ... good god, who knows what falls behind her car-seat ... is as easy as wiping everything down with a wet rag. At nearly 50k miles and almost 4 years old, it still looks brand new with no sagging.
My one complaint is that it doesn't breath as well as other options out there, but it takes several hours of driving to get to that point in my experience. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2013, 03:29 PM | #42 | |
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2013, 03:40 PM | #43 |
Private First Class
13
Rep 110
Posts |
Sounds like an exceptional experience. I have the leatherette and after 3 years and 60k miles: no visible wear. That being said, for my next car, I may go for the leather.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2013, 03:50 PM | #44 |
Enlisted Member
0
Rep 30
Posts
Drives: 2009 328i xDrive, 2006 325i
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
|
I purposely sought out leatherette in mine for the exact reasons listed in this thread: durability, easy-clean, virtually no-maintenance, and still looks like new (after 75k in my 2006).
I have (and had) leather in my other vehicles, and although I love that, too, I didn't want that in my BMW models. The inside/trim of our cars are delicate enough the way it is, to the touch, so why help add to the eroding over time with 'real' leather. : ) |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|