|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
BMS with valetronic tune-why not?
|
|
08-08-2010, 09:48 PM | #1 |
Banned
35
Rep 323
Posts |
BMS with valetronic tune-why not?
I am wondering why BMS is not coming out with a pbx 2 or update or something with a piggyback for valvetronic adjustment tune to compete with the other major tunes out there.
Maybe the guys-berger tuning does not know how-which would explain it-I guess I figure if someone is making a living off tuning they should have this know how and considering how well the pbx sold to me it would be worth the little bit of extra time and R and D considering it would be a small addition. I think a bit more lift from the valvetronic at higher rpms could add 10 hp to the top end easily-oh well just a thought |
08-10-2010, 09:09 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant
334
Rep 557
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2010, 09:09 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant
334
Rep 557
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2010, 10:09 PM | #10 |
Banned
35
Rep 323
Posts |
The fact is they didnt know how to do it-it wasnt a not profitable issue-who wouldnt want a pbx with more performance-that makes no sense-sounds like they just didnt spend the time or have the know how to tune valvetronic.
However as mentioned in another point I realized I would never touch the valvetronic since it wont match your current valve springs-changing the valvetronic is like adding a different camshaft and you NEVER add a cam without spring changes-not only will it not perform properly but longevity of the springs and the parts attached is severely compromised. That was a great point made in the other post and I dont know how RD sport offers their cams with no spring upgrade-that is even worse. I think guys these engines are really fully tuned from the factory if you want to keep stock parts. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 01:23 AM | #11 |
Banned
30
Rep 413
Posts |
I disagree. It is a profit issue.
even if they did not know how to do it, it was profit potential that kept them from trying to figure out how. the R&D costs outweighed what they thought potential profits would be. Plain and simple |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 07:42 AM | #12 | |
Colonel
89
Rep 2,030
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
AW E82 1M
MW F82 M4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 10:06 AM | #13 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4911
Rep 115,980
Posts |
Quote:
Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 04:30 PM | #14 |
Banned
35
Rep 323
Posts |
Guys there is not "R and D" when it comes to this stuff-they have the equipment-once you have it there is very little "research" and development is not a huge time consumption here-you either know how to do it or not. I mean it takes some time obviously to figur eout the system and the best values to gain hp and not lose hp but this is not going to take much more if they had alreayd gotten the pbx-like I said they did not know how to do it properly.
Also it could have been offered for a 100 dollar upgrade to owners of a pbx and could have been the same price as a pbx is now for new customers-stage 2 would just replace stage 1-it would be the new version for sale. how would it have to be 500 bucks. However the more I read about this I am convinced unless you change your valve springs and cam-there is only so much extra lift you can create adn you really cant increase your rpms past 7 withou changing out your springs and cam and still actually make good power. However that is my choice-still would have ben nice for them to offer even 10 extra hp by offering a very small increase in lift |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 04:59 PM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
406
Rep 3,879
Posts |
Quote:
So let me understand you here... your saying they dont need to R&D something that hasnt been done yet? there is no valvetronic piggy back tune out there, so they would be the first - and that calls for some R&D i dont care if BMW themselves came out with it - testing is needed. Now, I dont think you understand the amount of work to get a valvetronic tune into a car, let alone work it in to a piggyback module that works on every car. To tune valvetronic, you need to access the ECU itself - to do so requires mating the car to a standalone computer (at least an hour to sync) and running it on a dyno to see where the gains are to be had. now average dyno time is 100-150 for 3 pulls, as these machines EAT electricity like no ones business. Obviously you cant tune in 3 pulls, so after around 15 pulls you have logged enough data to actually see what the car is doing. From there it takes a knowledgeable ECU tuner to go through the maps and modify all the 1's and 0's in every part of the engine tuning, which takes hours to do correctly, then you need to re run the car on the dyno to make sure its not knocking or acting abused. Now all this is reletive to the car and owner of the car. I know I dont drive the same as you do, so my engine is used to things yours is not. if you have midifications beyond the stock engine - those will also com in to play since the car is no longer breathing stock, its advanced. now to take all of that into account for a piggy back system that will work flawlessly across all n52 platforms (as the PBX does) is a major undertaking. Since its a piggy back and not a flash, it needs to control many things from an outside point - instead of re-writting the ECU altogether like a Flash does. your asking for them to modify valvetronic inputs without rewriting the software.. that's not easy and will take A LOT of R&D on multiple cars. I dont see it being worth it for Terry and the BMS guys, the PBX is solid and you can not touch his price point with a 10 foot pole, especially for what they offer for under 300$. also, there are multiple videos shows improved acceleration times from a stop and from a roll with the powerbox, you might want to check out youtube - many people ad companies have done it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2010, 09:36 PM | #16 | |
Colonel
89
Rep 2,030
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
AW E82 1M
MW F82 M4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|