E90Post
 


Extreme Powerhouse
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N55 Turbo Engine Tuning and Exhaust Modifications - 335i Tuning > Turbo specs



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-26-2011, 06:33 AM   #45
Pepe_pr
Lieutenant
Puerto Rico
35
Rep
553
Posts

Drives: 135i black on black
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Juan PR

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerx View Post
spam much? lol
Stupid iphone app was showing an error and i tried to post and showed the error again but apparently it posted!!!

Sorry for the "spam"
__________________
USED TO HAVE A 385 whp 479 tq N55 335 2011 (AT) AND NOW A 135 M package 2010 (AT) 447whp/504tq
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2011, 07:21 AM   #46
berserkerx
Private First Class
berserkerx's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
164
Posts

Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah

iTrader: (0)

haha my phone has done that before. not on this forum though. I just had to give you shit.
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2011, 08:07 AM   #47
Dieselmd
Private
Dieselmd's Avatar
9
Rep
95
Posts

Drives: MW SO M4 DCT. EB M235i
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shockin330i View Post
What people tend to forget is that a twin scroll turbocharger isn't meant for big power up top. Twin scrolls like ours are meant for good low end tq. Granted a bigger turbo will yield better results.
Care to educate us on why Twin-Scroll turbos aren't designed for big power up top?
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2011, 08:48 AM   #48
Slops
Major General
Slops's Avatar
South Africa
188
Rep
5,417
Posts

Drives: 2005 C55 AMG
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxford

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dieselmd View Post
Care to educate us on why Twin-Scroll turbos aren't designed for big power up top?
interested as well...
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 12:45 AM   #49
shockin330i
Brigadier General
shockin330i's Avatar
798
Rep
4,784
Posts

Drives: 2016 ZCP M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: f y'all, I'm from Texas (RGV)

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dieselmd View Post
Care to educate us on why Twin-Scroll turbos aren't designed for big power up top?
This is a wonderful read for anyone
http://www.full-race.com/articles/efrturbotechbrief.pdf

But this is the section about twin vs single
Quote:
Let’s pause on the EFR housing descriptions and spend a few moments
on the subject of twin-scroll (divided) turbine housings. Twin-scroll
housings are becoming very popular for performance use, and for good
reason. By dividing the manifold and turbine housing into two flow
paths, the engine firing order can be made to “alternate” the flow all the
way to the turbine wheel inlet. The engine blow-down pulse is
generated when the exhaust valve opens. During the blow-down, the
engine power cylinder is still at very high pressure as a residual of
combustion and the power stroke. This initial “pop” of energy travels
at very high speed down the manifold runner, through the volute, and
impacts the wheel. For this reason, the stream is very much a “pulsed
flow” and the divided nature of the system simply amplifies and
arranges those pulses. The engine firing order creates a “one-two”
(alternating) punch on the wheel, keeping the pulses evenly spaced and
in rapid succession. As the engine speed increases, this becomes a blur
and the alternating nature loses its value. Hence, twin-scroll housings
only benefit the low and medium speed operation of an engine. Within
this range, it is a very effective way to improve turbine effectiveness.
The wheel loves the high velocity evenly-spaced pulses of gas, and as
21
long as they are “slow” enough in succession and duration, the wheel
can make good reaction usage of the energy. What results is an
improvement in “effective” efficiency, and at lower engine speeds more
turbine power can be generated. The obvious result is quicker spool
and better low-end boost response. As mentioned, the top-end
operation is not improved, everything else being equal. Put into
practice, a single-scroll housing of sufficiently large size is the recipe for
a user that is seeking only top-end power optimization. That said, a
very potent combination is a twin-scroll divided system that works to
retain good low speed boost response, while sizing it large
(aerodynamically) for the best top-end power. It’s the best of both
worlds, in many cases.
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 12:50 AM   #50
shockin330i
Brigadier General
shockin330i's Avatar
798
Rep
4,784
Posts

Drives: 2016 ZCP M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: f y'all, I'm from Texas (RGV)

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted335 View Post
hey shockin330 try to reset Ur proceeded...I had same issue wit bms jb4 Ur was over boosting.do u know ur boost levels at certain rpms. like bms custom tuning....u might just have turn down the boost little
I'll check it out.
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 09:45 AM   #51
turugara
Major
turugara's Avatar
91
Rep
1,324
Posts

Drives: 335i Coupe, 6 Speed
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2011 BMW 335i  [9.44]
Quote:
Originally Posted by shockin330i View Post
This is a wonderful read for anyone
http://www.full-race.com/articles/efrturbotechbrief.pdf

But this is the section about twin vs single

That makes sense. Thanks for linking.
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 11:04 AM   #52
Dieselmd
Private
Dieselmd's Avatar
9
Rep
95
Posts

Drives: MW SO M4 DCT. EB M235i
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States

iTrader: (1)

I m certinly not an engineer or an expert of any kind but, newer turbo-technology ie ultra strong and light turbine wheels and super efficient compressor wheels will change how consumers view twinscroll vs single turbos in the future. Again, I am not an expert but I, like the rest of you have read my socks off trying to understand why one MAY be better than the other. Once Full-Race becomes more active in the BMW community, Geoff will certainly add his vast knowledge here and educate us all a bit more.
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 11:08 AM   #53
Slow_335i
Daily Driven!
Slow_335i's Avatar
United_States
186
Rep
2,516
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central Illinois

iTrader: (11)

Garage List
2008 BMW 335I  [7.02]
OP good luck and keep us posted as you make progress
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 05:37 PM   #54
berserkerx
Private First Class
berserkerx's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
164
Posts

Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah

iTrader: (0)

I am currently trying to convince Geoff to be a vendor on the forums. That way he can officially come and speak for himself. I don't want to offend the mods myself and I know Geoff doesn't either.

on the topic of twin scroll BMW has moved to it. I believe ford has as well, Mitsubishi has used them for a long time. maybe we should just use a turbo like what comes on the newer ford with dual compressor wheels lol.

but from all I have read twin scroll is all about wide power band. not an ultimate power turbo.
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2011, 06:50 PM   #55
Slops
Major General
Slops's Avatar
South Africa
188
Rep
5,417
Posts

Drives: 2005 C55 AMG
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxford

iTrader: (2)

Thanks for the good read! My take is to size the turbo large enough to hit the top end that you want. Being twin scroll doesn't mean you can't make serious power up top while spooling up quick down low. Like the article said... Best of both worlds
Appreciate 0
      12-29-2011, 09:04 PM   #56
bojanglos
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2011-335-xdrive msport
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alberta

iTrader: (0)

You are correct in saying that the advantage of the Twin Scroll is you can use the opposing pulses to spool a bigger compressor faster. The problem with turbo sizing is that you can move massive air very fast on the compressor side but then cork the whole system up on the exhaust side. The concept of the twin scroll is too speed up the spool yet still allow big enough wheels to get the exhaust out. That is one of the reasons that I believe BMW switched to a twin scroll. The previous twins allowed more air. I have reasoned that the BMW doesn't really care about massive power at the top end. They made this car to have x amount of power and what they engineered does this. The other problem that the manufacture has is modded cars switched back to claim warranty. So if you limit the amount of air that can flow through the engine by limiting the size of the turbo you also limit the aftermarket from pushing the engine beyond its limits.
To go beyond these limits you have to mod the car enough that a warranty void is going to be obvious. The stock crank is rumored to be cast not forged so using the turbo as a cork seems like a good limiter to me. I wonder how many true performance minded individuals who are on this forum are actually willing to completely void the stock warranty and will actually do it knowing they have no warranty and not try and trick the dealer to get service when they have problems. I havn't owned a new car in 10 years that hasn't had the warranty voided by 1500 kms. This car will be no exception. When something breaks and I do mean when I replace it with something stronger. So to sum this up without a mass amount of people willing to void warranties seeing new big single options are not worth the aftermarket developing. I don't think that I will be using a JB4 on my car as I want full control and the only way I see that is with complete ECU re-flash. So that will be what holds me up but we will see what happens ECU wise shortly.

Cheers Bo J
Appreciate 0
      01-02-2012, 06:15 PM   #57
Tony135
Lieutenant Colonel
178
Rep
1,516
Posts

Drives: ‘22 Model 3
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Some good reading in here! I love the activity. Let's keep it up so we can get what we all want!
Appreciate 0
      01-02-2012, 08:56 PM   #58
Shamim
Captain
Shamim's Avatar
61
Rep
619
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SFV 818

iTrader: (9)

just curious, im not that educated in turbos but I know little things here and there. I am in the market for a 335 but getting a bit worried if i want to go with the n54 or n55.

Lets just say a 335 with the n55 engine having a charge pipe, intercooler, downpipes, intake, meth, no cats but a good muffler, and a ecu tune. What numbers are expected (generally ofcourse) and what boost can you put out from the turbo. Will it break the crank shaft?
Appreciate 0
      01-03-2012, 12:02 AM   #59
bojanglos
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2011-335-xdrive msport
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alberta

iTrader: (0)

Can anyone actually verify( not I read I heard) but has actually seen a crank break. See I would be skeptical of that being that the engine is an Inline 6. Cast crnks were used for years yes not as good as forged but they have their advantages as well. If you have seen one lets get some pictures and what actually caused the crank to break.
Appreciate 0
      01-03-2012, 11:19 AM   #60
Tony135
Lieutenant Colonel
178
Rep
1,516
Posts

Drives: ‘22 Model 3
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamim View Post
just curious, im not that educated in turbos but I know little things here and there. I am in the market for a 335 but getting a bit worried if i want to go with the n54 or n55.

Lets just say a 335 with the n55 engine having a charge pipe, intercooler, downpipes, intake, meth, no cats but a good muffler, and a ecu tune. What numbers are expected (generally ofcourse) and what boost can you put out from the turbo. Will it break the crank shaft?
I have all of that minus the intake which doesn't do much anyway. I haven't dynoed recently since I fixed everything but it should be around 380whp and 430tq
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2013, 03:39 PM   #61
shivaswrath
Brigadier General
shivaswrath's Avatar
United_States
649
Rep
4,323
Posts

Drives: 2012 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lost in NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony135 View Post
I have all of that minus the intake which doesn't do much anyway. I haven't dynoed recently since I fixed everything but it should be around 380whp and 430tq
Did anyone finally uncover specs on the N55 turbo?
Is it updated in the F30?

i'm trying to sort out whether an FMIC is worth the cost or not...
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 RS3 (miss you guys)
SOLD: 2012 335i Mineral Gray

M Performance Exhaust/Brakes/Suspension/LSD|Bav Stage 1/AMP||ER CP/IC/DP/OC | Dinan CAI/N55 PWG BIG TURBO|BMWF30.com
Appreciate 0
      03-11-2013, 12:26 AM   #62
Andrewe92
enthusiast
Andrewe92's Avatar
United_States
117
Rep
997
Posts

Drives: 2011 e92 lci 335xi
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
OP whats the need for all that power damn ahah
Appreciate 0
      03-11-2013, 08:28 PM   #63
melloww22
Captain
melloww22's Avatar
United_States
105
Rep
955
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i E90
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by missilewarriorz View Post
OP whats the need for all that power damn ahah
Wow 16 months old post... N55 turbo R&D just got some time in the sun since stage 2 turbo upgrades for n54 have been completed...

N55 turbo upgrade won't be a reality for at least 18 more months... Too expensive and low level of support from builders...
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST