|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
What do you guys think of the 08+ STi?
|
|
02-11-2009, 03:01 PM | #1 |
Captain
61
Rep 697
Posts |
What do you guys think of the 08+ STi?
Have any of you guys driven/own 08+ STi? What were your impressions? Compared to a 335?
Any known issues? Heard minor issues like cold start 2nd gear, rattling of the trunk cover...anything else? I was thinking about picking one up, but wanted to get some input before I go do the test drive. I've check the STi forums, but obviously biased towards STi being the best car out there.
__________________
|Arrived 12/14/06| JP Vizage Kit| Gone 4/4/09 |
|
02-11-2009, 03:03 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant General
1138
Rep 12,444
Posts |
'09 WRXs (not STi) seem to have very similar acceleration numbers. just throwin' that out there.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2009, 03:06 PM | #3 | |
Colonel
448
Rep 2,032
Posts
Drives: Red Flyer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 38.8977° N, 77.0366° W
|
Quote:
Motor Trend got one to go 0-60 in 4.8 seconds. I'd save a couple grand and get the WRX.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2009, 04:17 PM | #4 | |
Completely obsessed with detailing
299
Rep 15,442
Posts
Drives: E90 SG 330i, white Scion tC
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco and Davis
|
Quote:
With the Subaru, you WILL get rattles and stuff every so often because it's not built like the 335i. It's hard to compare it to the 335i in anything except some performance things. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2009, 06:11 PM | #5 |
First Lieutenant
116
Rep 313
Posts |
Umm i drove one . As fast as they look on paper motor trend, car and driver , etc. To me it didn't give me that brutal grunt i was expecting.It was definitely quick but i don't know just not that exciting to me. Doesn't sound that great either. Reguardless you should drive it to see for yourself . But um styling wise IMO i like the look of the 07's much more. O0O almost forgot , definitely overpriced.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 03:20 AM | #6 | |
Banned
55
Rep 2,013
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 05:22 AM | #7 | |
General
228
Rep 20,998
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 11:38 AM | #10 |
Captain
61
Rep 697
Posts |
Please provide reasoning on why it's a POS? Just wanted to get your feedback on it.
I was thinking about getting the EVO X, but interior looks cheaper than STi and trunk space sucks. I like: -Practicalilty of a hatchback (can fit a lot) -AWD -Interior better than X -I snowboard alot so I can take it up to the snow w/o having to have a SUV -I actually like the looks of it -tunibility add less than $5K worth of mods to be around 350 rwhp/ 350 rwtq -Right now can be had from high $20K to low $30K -Will take to the track a few times a year for auto crossing -If I damage it parts wont cost as much as Beamer -as far as my knowledge pretty reliable (correct me if I'm wrong)
__________________
|Arrived 12/14/06| JP Vizage Kit| Gone 4/4/09 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 01:27 PM | #11 | |
Captain
18
Rep 739
Posts |
Quote:
-AWD is similar to evo but handling goes to evoX -doesn't feel as attached to the road -lots of oversteer -can't take neither to snow pile unless you have a dedicated winter tire -INITIAL tunability is just as good as evoX -I wonder why they're so cheap compared to evoX? -They will do horrible at autocross compared to evoX If you don't plan on enjoying its performance aspect which the car was originally made for, you should do just fine with the subaru. When it comes down these kind of cars, I couldn't care less about trunk space and interior. To each to his own
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold..... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 01:35 PM | #12 | |
Banned
55
Rep 2,013
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 06:09 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant General
1138
Rep 12,444
Posts |
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 07:11 PM | #14 |
***** noob
1369
Rep 10,479
Posts
Drives: 325xi>M235i>428GCx Mspor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston
|
get WRX
I heard they're having huge discounts (due to the economy) on them |
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2009, 09:11 PM | #15 |
Closet N54 Fan
2
Rep 86
Posts |
Evo > STI.
Not a biased opinion at all .
__________________
'06 EVO IX MR 10.51@127mph (1.40 60ft)
World's Quickest/Fastest Stock Turbo/Motor Evolution 400whp/397wtq. Stock Turbo. Stock Cams. E85 Powered. Tuned by JSDyno.com Sweet vids of my car kicking ass... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 01:51 PM | #16 |
First Lieutenant
76
Rep 306
Posts |
Theres a lot of bashing on the 08+ sti, but honestly I like it. It's obviously geared toward a more practical daily driver, with plenty of utility. The ride is a lot softer and there is more body roll than I'd like, but that's nothing a couple suspension mods could fix.
There was some major discounting going on the 08 sti models a couple months ago, not sure if it's still going on but they can be had for 6-8k off. It's true the 09 wrx throws down very similar performance figures compared to the STI, but in the end the STI has more potential and looks a ton better. I can't get over how crappy the wrxs look now. Obviously the STI is not as hardcore as it was before but it's still a good car and I think for your purposes it suits your needs. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 02:08 PM | #17 |
Captain
18
Rep 739
Posts |
Former Sti's could "almost" hang with evo's. Current Sti is just a fast family car.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold..... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 02:17 PM | #18 |
Major
68
Rep 1,456
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 335i
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
|
My friend who goes to the track a lot will tell you the STi is a much better performer than the WRX; and yes, he's driven both.
Personally I like the hatchback; all the championship winning WRC cars of recent years were hatchbacks. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 03:05 PM | #19 |
Captain
22
Rep 661
Posts |
Priced the same I’d take the Evo over the STI, tiny bit slower in s straight line but a better overall performer. I was able to get a STI when they had the $8k off MSRP and 0% for 63m so that made it worth it to me. If I had gotten the same deal on an EVO MR I would have taken that even with the utility hit (more for styling and the dual clutch than anything else).
It takes all of a grand to significantly improve the STI you just need the following: Cobb Accessport with a stage 1 map - $695 Whiteline 24mm front sway - $195 Whiteline 22mm rear sway - $175 Whiteline steering rack bushings $65 Alignment – depends on the shop This will put you at 340hp/345tq if you have access to 93 octane and tighten the steering response and turn in while reducing understeer and bodyroll by a lot. Add a turboback for $1500 and a custom tune and you can probably get another 40hp/50tq. If you are looking for something to go nuts on it’s probably best to go with a base Evo GSR and mod from there. The old iron block motor was bulletproof and so far the new one seems to be holding up well. If you want fast and functional I’d say go with the STI, you can pack a lot of stuff in there. Don’t mind Gator, he’s a Z driver so hates anything with more than 2 doors. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 03:49 PM | #20 | |
Captain
61
Rep 697
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for helpful info Do you need to upgrade the turbo in order to get 400 rwhp/ 400 rwtq on 91 oct w/o meth? I just really like the "utility" in this car and seems like a fun little car to drive.
__________________
|Arrived 12/14/06| JP Vizage Kit| Gone 4/4/09 |
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2009, 05:10 PM | #22 |
Colonel
117
Rep 2,232
Posts
Drives: 2016 M3
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TN
|
__________________
2016 M3
2016 Audi Q5 3.0T |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|