|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
GIAC with JB+ Dynos with Logs!!
|
|
05-20-2011, 11:03 AM | #1 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
GIAC with JB+ Dynos with Logs!!
I recently went to the strip and added a JB+ to my current GIAC race tune and ran an 11.77 at 119.9. I thought I was boosting about an extra 2 psi but it turns out that it was about an extra 2.5 psi.
The question that I think everybody asks is, "Is this really safe?" Well, one thing is for sure and that is that it is much harder on the turbos but what about everything else? I went to European Auto Source yesterday and added about 2 gallons of race gas. One gallon was MS109 and another gallon was 100 octane. This was added to about 1/4 of a gallon of 91. So, I had a little over 100 octane in the tank and figured that it was safe enough. I was curious about a couple things... -What is the boost? -How are my AtoFs? -What does my timing look like? -How hard are the turbos working? O was actually quite surprised. Everything that GIAC tuned for stayed exactly the same. The only thing that rose was the boost. The timing stayed perfect. The interesting thing is the logs of boost when I added the JB+. The ECU thinks that the actual boost is lower due to the JB+. This is the reason why the turbos boost more to try to hit the target. When I went to European Auto Source, I added the race gas and then ran the car on the dyno just to let the gas get through the veigns. Then I wanted to do a baseline with GIAC without the JB. The first 2 runs were without the JB+. When looking at the maximum area under the curve, it looked like my best run had the peak numbers of 414.73 WHP and 450.73 WTQ I then stopped the car, added the JB+ and then did 3 more runs. Again, when looking at the maximum area under the curve, it looked like my best run had the peak numbers of 438.14 WHP and 484.09 WTQ Here is the Legend: Pic1...Dyno graph of runs without JB+ with Boost Pic2...Dyno graph of runs without JB+ with AtoF Pic3...Dyno graph of runs with JB+ with Boost Pic4...Dyno graph of runs with JB+ with AtoF Pic5...Dyno graph of Best without and Best with JB+ with Boost Pic6...Dyno graph of Best without and Best with JB+ with AtoF
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
05-20-2011, 11:03 AM | #2 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Here are the logs.
Remember... Runs 1-2 are without the JB+. Runs 3-5 are with the JB+. Here is the order: - Timing - Boost - Duty Cycle - Throttle
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:16 AM | #3 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Reserved for Video
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:24 AM | #5 |
Major
35
Rep 1,252
Posts |
That's awesome that you tried this, doc'ed it and shared. I just installed a JB+ last night to my stock e92 and have it set to just under 75%. The car is still adjusting I think. But I'm pretty happy with it so far.
Three questions for you: -what setting did you have the JB+ at? -Are you going to keep the JB+ installed? -Did you just leave the JB+ "hanging" or did you zip tie it to something? I feel like I need to attach it to something...
__________________
2012 528XI Saphire Black
Stock for now 2007 e92 335i - Monaco Blue Injen DCI w/ Cyba Scoop - M-Tech Rear - ///M3 Rear Lip Spoiler - ///M5 SMG Shift Knob & iDrive Knob - BMW Performance Hand Brake - BMWCCA Member |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:24 AM | #6 |
Major General
161
Rep 7,378
Posts |
Very nice mr5. I run this combo to and worked pretty well with meth.
__________________
07 335i AT - MOTIV 750 - MHD E85 BMS flash - BMS PI - JB4G5 - Okada Coils - NGK 5992 Plugs - Helix IC - Snow Stg. 3 - Stett CP - Custom midpipes with 100 HJS Cats - Bastuck Quad - PSS10 - QUAIFE LSD - BMS OCC - Forge DVs - AR OC - ALCON BBK - M3 Chassi - Dinan CP - Velocity M rear Toe arms - Advan RZ-DF - LUX H8 - Level 10 AT upgrade
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:26 AM | #7 |
Private First Class
9
Rep 192
Posts |
Nice smooth runs.
question: since you mentioned that you had thought boost was 2 psi above, and it turns out it was more like 2.75- was that the default setting on JB+ or did you actually attempt to dial it back slightly?
__________________
2013550Xi msport white
335xi-JB3, UR DPs, code-3 fmic, BMS filter,borla catback,11.96@116 |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:30 AM | #9 |
Banned
3
Rep 208
Posts |
438whp are you fucking serious ?!!!!!!!!!!!! This is stronger than any tune out there ! You ran meth or race gas only ? You think results would be about same with 93 pump + 100% meth ? WOW unbelievable !!!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:30 AM | #10 |
Banned
273
Rep 5,876
Posts |
Ahh, he posted it after That looks really good...one thing that worries me a bit is the GIAC timing curve...its really aggressive, going all the way to 15deg at redline...with the added boost there is no room in the stock timing curve but then again we've seen these boost levels and timing curves with piggies for the last 3 years and it is the settings I ran many times with the procede (18-19psi and 0 ignition correction) and there have never been any issues...with the JB+ though I don't think this is safe to run on the car all the time...I wouldn't mind running it like you did but with datalogging on the side as the results might vastly vary with temps/weather but maybe the ECU would adjust for that as well...
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:38 AM | #11 | |||
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
If I were to use it again, I would dial it down but I just wanted to dyno the same as what I ran at the strip the other night so this is the power that I had when I ran the 120 mph traps. Quote:
Quote:
What is interesting is that bigger turbos are boosting this and the block is taking it so the main worry for me is the turbos.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:40 AM | #12 |
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1121
Rep 5,396
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
This is a recipe for disaster....
__________________
6MT | COBB | AR | AE | Forge DV | HPF | P3 Gauge | Hybrid Intake | O.S.Giken TCD | All M3 bits | TCKLine | StopTech | UUC | ER | SPEC
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:41 AM | #13 | |
Banned
3
Rep 208
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:42 AM | #14 |
Banned
273
Rep 5,876
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:45 AM | #15 |
Banned
3
Rep 208
Posts |
once in a while is ok ? lol This setup on 93 octane + 100% meth would be as effective ?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:48 AM | #16 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Look at the logs and explain your thinking.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:49 AM | #17 |
Banned
273
Rep 5,876
Posts |
No not just "once in a while"...no one without proper datalogging and understand exactly what they're doing should ever run this setup...Mr. 5 understands the risks and know what he is doing by looking at datalogs...i just wouldn't have run it at the track before datalogging like this but better now than never
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:50 AM | #18 | |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
This was added for a map for the 1/4 mile strip on the best fuel. No. I would run no less than 100 octane plus meth.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:51 AM | #19 | |
Banned
3
Rep 208
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:53 AM | #20 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Here's another thing that I like.
The boost at redline with the JB added is almost the same as without. I like how the boost increases in the "safer" spot. It's definitely not running 17 psi all the way to redline like other tunes.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:55 AM | #21 |
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1121
Rep 5,396
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I really don't need to look at any logs. Just use common sense. The JB+ is a dumb boost controller. Crap one at best. You are adding extra boost but there are no timing adjustments whatsoever for that extra boost. Nor there are any for the increased ETGs. Yeah, you may get away with a few runs like that, but it won't last long.
Stacking piggybacks and tunes has NEVER been a good idea on any platform. I highly doubt that the N54 is much different.
__________________
6MT | COBB | AR | AE | Forge DV | HPF | P3 Gauge | Hybrid Intake | O.S.Giken TCD | All M3 bits | TCKLine | StopTech | UUC | ER | SPEC
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:57 AM | #22 | ||
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1121
Rep 5,396
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Quote:
I told you this is a recipe for disaster. See what I mean... First victim of experimentation is lined up. LOL
__________________
6MT | COBB | AR | AE | Forge DV | HPF | P3 Gauge | Hybrid Intake | O.S.Giken TCD | All M3 bits | TCKLine | StopTech | UUC | ER | SPEC
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|