A couple of JB3 dynos

yandy · 02-02-2010, 08:39 PM

These are from LostMarine, he's banned I guess..

first is JB3 1.4 MAP7

The last two are JB3 2.0 (still beta) with the addition of a miltek exhaust

Informational only, I guess terry is cool with him posting it, since he also posted on N54TECH.COM

Enjoy

scalbert · 02-02-2010, 08:46 PM

That is a weird dip in torque at about 4100 revs.

Htown09 · 02-02-2010, 08:52 PM

shitty graph, what kind of dyno is that? Can barely read the #'s

N/M Mustang Dyno, they always read low. Everyone should do dynojet SAE smoothing 5 for consistency.

scalbert · 02-02-2010, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Htown09

shitty graph, what kind of dyno is that? Can barely read the #'s

It states that it is a Mustang Dyno on the second graph. The Torque and HP axis's are not equal so it will look off. Nevertheless, the dip is weird.

A418t81 · 02-02-2010, 09:03 PM

Mustang dyno graphs frankly all look like crap unless they change the mode over to the style that gives you the "MS paint" looking mustang graphs, which honestly, are just as useless. DJ definitely nailed the graphical data representation, IMO.

a32guy · 02-02-2010, 09:44 PM

Its not the dyno that is wrong, the filtering just needs to be a little higher-- 30 or so would provide a smoother looking graph... But this shows something is up with power delivery.

Mike@N54Tuning.com · 02-03-2010, 06:08 AM

Looks fine for beta software, would need to see a boost trace to determine if its doing what its supposed to do. That it's making more peak power than 1.4 is a nice surprise!

Mike

Former_Boosted_IS · 02-03-2010, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A418t81

Mustang dyno graphs frankly all look like crap unless they change the mode over to the style that gives you the "MS paint" looking mustang graphs, which honestly, are just as useless. DJ definitely nailed the graphical data representation, IMO.

Agreed on the look, but I do love that they are load based and Mustang Dynos are probably the single most realistic dyno out there.

huyner328 · 02-03-2010, 07:54 AM

Here's another JB3 dyno. Only mod at the time was a BMS DCI. We did 3 pulls, first one was Map 5, then Map 7, then 0.

I think I have a relatively smooth power band beginning at 5100, right?

a32guy · 02-03-2010, 08:03 AM

Smoother looking, but your filtering value is at 50, vs 6 as posted by the OP.

02-02-2010, 08:39 PM	#1
yandy Lieutenant Colonel 108 Rep 1,973 Posts Drives: 2009 e92 MR "Civic" ///M3 Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Miami, FL iTrader: (3) Garage List 2009 BMW M3 [0.00]	A couple of JB3 dynos These are from LostMarine, he's banned I guess.. first is JB3 1.4 MAP7 The last two are JB3 2.0 (still beta) with the addition of a miltek exhaust Informational only, I guess terry is cool with him posting it, since he also posted on N54TECH.COM Enjoy __________________ \|\| DCT \| ESS Tune \| ACM Test-pipes \| AA Green Filter \| Swift Spec-R Springs \| Stoptech ST-40 F \|\| \|\| My Youtube Channel \|\|
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

02-02-2010, 08:46 PM	#2
scalbert Major General 153 Rep 5,780 Posts Drives: '13 S4, '15 Q7 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Woodstock, GA iTrader: (8)	That is a weird dip in torque at about 4100 revs.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-02-2010, 08:52 PM	#3
Htown09 Captain 44 Rep 783 Posts Drives: E92 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Earth iTrader: (3)	shitty graph, what kind of dyno is that? Can barely read the #'s N/M Mustang Dyno, they always read low. Everyone should do dynojet SAE smoothing 5 for consistency.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-02-2010, 09:03 PM	#5
A418t81 Lieutenant Colonel 293 Rep 1,512 Posts Drives: Ever changing fleet Join Date: May 2007 Location: Alabama iTrader: (1) Garage List 2013 335is [0.00]	Mustang dyno graphs frankly all look like crap unless they change the mode over to the style that gives you the "MS paint" looking mustang graphs, which honestly, are just as useless. DJ definitely nailed the graphical data representation, IMO. __________________ 23 iX M60, 24 GT3 RS Weissach, 22 Rivian R1T, 23 RS3, 13 E92 M3 Competition: Akra Evo, KW V3, etc
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-02-2010, 09:44 PM	#6
a32guy First Lieutenant 25 Rep 374 Posts Drives: AW 335i Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: CT iTrader: (2)	Its not the dyno that is wrong, the filtering just needs to be a little higher-- 30 or so would provide a smoother looking graph... But this shows something is up with power delivery.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-03-2010, 06:08 AM	#7
Mike@N54Tuning.com Joint Chiefs of Staff 4907 Rep 115,980 Posts Drives: 2007 335i, 2015 M3 Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: N54tuning.com iTrader: (89)	Looks fine for beta software, would need to see a boost trace to determine if its doing what its supposed to do. That it's making more peak power than 1.4 is a nice surprise! Mike
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-03-2010, 08:03 AM	#10
a32guy First Lieutenant 25 Rep 374 Posts Drives: AW 335i Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: CT iTrader: (2)	Smoother looking, but your filtering value is at 50, vs 6 as posted by the OP.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search