|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Looking to buy... confused over engine to pick
|
|
04-02-2008, 02:15 PM | #23 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
949
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Mate i totally agree, thats why id never have a range. Looks the part and good for taking people out, but for performance and road holding
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 02:17 PM | #24 |
Banned
75
Rep 2,927
Posts
Drives: E60 530D M SPORT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: england
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 02:59 PM | #25 | |
Private First Class
5
Rep 172
Posts |
Quote:
What arrogance! Last edited by deejaygee; 04-03-2008 at 04:53 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 03:03 PM | #26 |
Banned
75
Rep 2,927
Posts
Drives: E60 530D M SPORT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: england
|
true true 163 is a good engine just got to look at the awards it has won it kicks ass in other makes in that range,
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2008, 11:13 AM | #28 |
Colonel
40
Rep 2,652
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2008, 11:39 AM | #29 |
Private First Class
15
Rep 170
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2008, 02:22 AM | #30 | |
Lieutenant General
1867
Rep 13,043
Posts
Drives: BMW M340I G20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2008, 03:22 PM | #31 |
Major
310
Rep 1,314
Posts |
Well i have a 330d auto with ED and do a 39 miles commute each day. 50% Motorway at 75-80 and 50% A roads at 50-60. Only 3 tanks so far but I am averaging 40 MPG which is damn good in my book.
On a motorwat cruise at 80 mph it is returning 42-43MPG. A slower speed would see 45ish. Hope that helps! |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 04:03 AM | #32 |
New Member
7
Rep 20
Posts |
Hi,
Thanks for all the info, you've all been really helpful. Went up to the local stealer's and tried the 163hp engine and then the 177 back to back. Biggest difference between them seems to be the more sudden drop off in power at the top of the rev range especially in second and third in the 163 car. In second on the 163 @ 4500 RPM the power just disappears, on the 177 its tops out slightly further on but the power is constant with no sudden embarrassment as your trying to pass someone. I know much of this is just getting used to changing gears sooner, after the Celica with its 8500 rpm vvtil engine its going to take a while to convert back to diesel mode. Does anyone know if a remap on the 163 will reduce the drop off upper rev ranges? Thanks again for all the help braces for panning of driving style Gordon |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 11:16 AM | #33 |
Banned
75
Rep 2,927
Posts
Drives: E60 530D M SPORT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: england
|
a remap pn a 163 is mind blowing same as all the engines really 325 335 it takes out all the turbo lag and makes more grunt you will know if its been remapped easy 1st 2nd 3rd are quick even on motorway 70 in 6th still pulls to 90 easy and quick
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 01:17 PM | #34 |
Second Lieutenant
58
Rep 295
Posts |
6 cylinder diesel all the way
I have a 335d, my friend has a 320d. They look the same, mine has twice the power. I get 500 miles to a tank, he gets 600. BUT I get out of mine with a huge grin every day!! I got an ex demo for £26.5k, he bought his new for £29k Total no brainer |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 02:01 PM | #35 | |
Colonel
104
Rep 2,292
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Golf Ed35 Black with - Black Leather
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 03:37 PM | #36 |
Banned
75
Rep 2,927
Posts
Drives: E60 530D M SPORT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: england
|
with 40k on the clock lol
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2008, 05:10 PM | #37 |
Major General
147
Rep 5,080
Posts
Drives: 530d
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gloucestershire
|
I think on balance If I was doing 26000 miles a year then it would have to be the ED 320d.
The six cylinders are excellent, but with something like a £500 difference in the annual fuel bill, let alone maintenance, insurance and everything that goes with it would be enough to sway me. Even more so the difference between a newer and older car if you plan to rack up the miles. I'm glad I do less than half that mileage.
__________________
Gone: Fiesta - Focus - E46 320dSE - E91 330dMSport - E82 135iMSport - R55 JCW Clubman - M135i Now: 530d |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 02:44 AM | #38 | |
Major General
275
Rep 9,218
Posts |
Quote:
Depreciation on a high value car is pretty scary anyway, but at higher mileage it's painful. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 04:01 AM | #39 |
Second Lieutenant
58
Rep 295
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 04:07 AM | #40 |
Second Lieutenant
58
Rep 295
Posts |
There is another way to look at this
Lets say you buy a 335d/330d with 10k on the clock 12 months old for £27k or A new ED 320d for the same the price is just an example In three years time you'll have a 4 year old 335d with 110k or a three year old 320d with 100k The 335d will be worth more, at least 3-4k more. Which will be the difference in you fuel, tax and insurance over that period of time So you have probably spent the same out of you own pocket just driven a much better car |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 10:11 AM | #42 |
Second Lieutenant
11
Rep 276
Posts |
Some new 325d info.
Just dynoed my stock 325d manual, 218 hp! (185 at the rear wheels) This engine is way more fresh than it is supposed to be, and not far from the 330d really. But its the same engine, just tuned down a bit. It can be chipped to 280 hp by ESS, they have a dealer in the UK. And it has 6 cylinder charm and VERY good milage. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 10:13 AM | #43 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
949
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Nice one Dag Johnsen, would have thought it would be more then 218bhp if it made 185 at the wheels thats only a loss of 33bhp. I would think the loss would be greater.
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2008, 10:38 AM | #44 | |
Second Lieutenant
11
Rep 276
Posts |
Quote:
I think 15% on a manual is quite spot on, maybe 18-20% on auto. Originally I thought 12,7% on a manual, but the ESS guys showed me a lot of dynos on different BMWs from 120d to E60 M5, and they have found that on manual cars 15% is close to reality. Hey man, what do you think about 245,2 rwhp and 660 NM for a 325d? With no topspeedlimiter and revving to 5200 rpm |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|