New map - V2.0.2 - 1-10-07

yahtzee · 01-10-2008, 10:26 PM

I'm assuming he meant to say 1-10-2008 but just happened to go to the link in Shiv's signature and see that there is a new map....FYI

OpenFlash · 01-10-2008, 10:30 PM

2007, huh? I must be living in the past

Fixed, btw

yahtzee · 01-10-2008, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

2007, huh? I must be living in the past

Fixed, btw

Anything noticeable with the new map? Do you still not recommend having different TQ levels across the rpm range?

OpenFlash · 01-10-2008, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yahtzee

Anything noticeable with the new map? Do you still not recommend having different TQ levels across the rpm range?

Still same recommendations apply. There is no performance differences with this map over the the 12-29 map. Just changed some speed delimit parameters. That's all.

Shiv

jpsimon · 01-10-2008, 10:51 PM

shiv, i've been wondering why you don't list these maps as like:

2.0.2.1....2.0.2.2... etc... instead of just the same 2.0.2 with a date.

I guess in the end it doesn't matter, people would either just look for the newest date... or the biggest version number. Anyways, I digress..

ed021180 · 01-10-2008, 11:09 PM

he feels like it

jpsimon · 01-10-2008, 11:18 PM

thanks for your input ed021180

335iheLLraiseR · 01-10-2008, 11:30 PM

that tends to happen to people have their own emoticon...

Hokie 335i · 01-11-2008, 11:21 AM

Shiv, is there any difference in performance between this map and the 12-19 map? I'm running off of 12-19 and was hoping that a newer V2.02 map would fix my 15.2psi boost at 90% problem.

bullmrkt · 01-11-2008, 11:25 AM

Shiv- just curious why the speed limiter needed tweaking?

OpenFlash · 01-11-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bullmrkt

Shiv- just curious why the speed limiter needed tweaking?

The clamp speed might not have been low enough for non-Sport guys with the 135mph speed limit. So i dropped it down to 120mph. That's all.

Shiv

OpenFlash · 01-11-2008, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hokie 335i

Shiv, is there any difference in performance between this map and the 12-19 map? I'm running off of 12-19 and was hoping that a newer V2.02 map would fix my 15.2psi boost at 90% problem.

The new maps should make absolutely no difference. And looking at your datalogs, I wish I had your "problem"

Just do what we talked about yesterday to make sure that dropping the User TQ numbers drops boost.

Shiv

Hokie 335i · 01-11-2008, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

The new maps should make absolutely no difference. And looking at your datalogs, I wish I had your "problem"

Just do what we talked about yesterday to make sure that dropping the User TQ numbers drops boost.

Shiv

I will drop the User TQ table to 70% this weekend to check it out but why is my "problem" something you wish you had? Didn't you state that raising User TQ does stuff other than just raising boost to increase power? I don't want to be down on power for the same amount of boost just because I can't set my User TQ as high. I also just wish my stuff was more inline with everybody else's so I didn't think something was wrong.

Sniz · 01-11-2008, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hokie 335i

I will drop the User TQ table to 70% this weekend to check it out but why is my "problem" something you wish you had? Didn't you state that raising User TQ does stuff other than just raising boost to increase power? I don't want to be down on power for the same amount of boost just because I can't set my User TQ as high. I also just wish my stuff was more inline with everybody else's so I didn't think something was wrong.

I know this doesn't help your situation, but I'm at 95% and seeing 12.5psi. I think that is what Shiv was referring to. You are boosting to a good number so its not as much of a problem as not hitting your boost targets.

Tuned335i · 01-11-2008, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hokie 335i

Shiv, is there any difference in performance between this map and the 12-19 map? I'm running off of 12-19 and was hoping that a newer V2.02 map would fix my 15.2psi boost at 90% problem.

Are you reading that boost number off the datalog or do you have a gauge installed? I'm asking because my car is behaving nearly identical to yours. I'm running about 96 octane and 90% is producing exactly 15psi or slightly above like you. My gauge is picking up the boost pressure from the DV line. I'm at 1,600ft elevation, with no mods other than PROcede V2.

rideelement247 · 01-11-2008, 10:39 PM

So I assume updating to this map off of the 12-29 w/ speed limiter would have no affect whatsoever correct? No other changes right?

01-10-2008, 10:26 PM	#1
yahtzee El Capitan 138 Rep 699 Posts Drives: fast Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Virginia iTrader: (1)	New map - V2.0.2 - 1-10-07 I'm assuming he meant to say 1-10-2008 but just happened to go to the link in Shiv's signature and see that there is a new map....FYI
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

01-10-2008, 10:30 PM	#2
OpenFlash 1737 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	2007, huh? I must be living in the past Fixed, btw
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-10-2008, 10:51 PM	#5
jpsimon Team Zissou 3065 Rep 10,197 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	shiv, i've been wondering why you don't list these maps as like: 2.0.2.1....2.0.2.2... etc... instead of just the same 2.0.2 with a date. I guess in the end it doesn't matter, people would either just look for the newest date... or the biggest version number. Anyways, I digress.. Last edited by jpsimon; 01-10-2008 at 11:30 PM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-10-2008, 11:09 PM	#6
ed021180 Enlisted Member 5 Rep 40 Posts Drives: bmw 335ci, M3 on order Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: MIAMI iTrader: (0)	he feels like it
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-10-2008, 11:18 PM	#7
jpsimon Team Zissou 3065 Rep 10,197 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	thanks for your input ed021180
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-11-2008, 11:21 AM	#9
Hokie 335i Private First Class 17 Rep 194 Posts Drives: F15 X5 50i M-Sport Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: DC Area iTrader: (1)	Shiv, is there any difference in performance between this map and the 12-19 map? I'm running off of 12-19 and was hoping that a newer V2.02 map would fix my 15.2psi boost at 90% problem.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-11-2008, 11:25 AM	#10
bullmrkt Lieutenant 23 Rep 464 Posts Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: usually my desk iTrader: (0)	Shiv- just curious why the speed limiter needed tweaking? __________________ 2021 AMG E63S Hammer Wagon 2002 BMW Z8 (with a Dinan DP Engine) 1996 Porsche 911 (993) Turbo 1995 Ferrari F355 Berlinetta 6mt 1964 Porsche 356 C Coupe
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-11-2008, 10:39 PM	#16
rideelement247 Lieutenant Colonel 54 Rep 1,677 Posts Drives: 08 335i, 67 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2007 Location: South Florida iTrader: (2)	So I assume updating to this map off of the 12-29 w/ speed limiter would have no affect whatsoever correct? No other changes right? __________________ Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
	Appreciate 0 Quote