|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Fitment issue... 18x9 +25 18x11 +25
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-29-2011, 08:49 PM | #1 |
Wagon life
39
Rep 991
Posts |
Fitment issue... 18x9 +25 18x11 +25
Size as stated, tires are Dunlop Direzza 225/40/18 and 265/35/18... Rubbing issues in the front? Rear I'm sure will rub... wondering if it's curable with just a roll!
Anyone have any experience, pics, etc of an E92 slammed on 18x11 +25? Thanks! |
05-29-2011, 11:00 PM | #2 |
Major General
654
Rep 8,801
Posts |
that's pretty aggressive.
u'll def need to roll - aggressively and maybe more tire stretch. maybe tee will come in and share some of his knowledge.
__________________
FrankiE90 AKA:.[The TANK] *CLICK THE SIG
E90s (been gone but not forgotten) • KW clubsports • • • • • • • • • • 18" BBS GT4 // Build E30 (pending) + E46 M3 Wagon ESTORIL Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
05-29-2011, 11:20 PM | #3 |
Colonel
117
Rep 2,232
Posts
Drives: 2016 M3
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TN
|
Front you be fine, rear will needed major roll
__________________
2016 M3
2016 Audi Q5 3.0T |
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2011, 12:09 AM | #4 |
Banned
81
Rep 4,541
Posts |
245/35 slammed @ -2.4 (max camber) with roll will still rub. Fk bumpstops would help ALOT. Thats a pretty big stagger with the rears paired with those fronts.
The back pokes 13mm @ -1.8 while the fronts are flush @ -.65, unless you want it to look like that. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 10:07 PM | #6 |
Pro Hater
49
Rep 1,717
Posts |
9" +25 with 225 is no problem
11" +25 with 265 will need max camber (-3) and roll/mild pull. Drop to 255 and you'll be fine. 225/40 and 255/35 should be a pretty easy fit Tee... I got -3.1 camber on stock arms. 255/35 at -2.5 should be fine. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 12:12 AM | #8 |
Banned
90
Rep 1,248
Posts |
just like ur title states.... Also with the same tire brand and size!!!
My old set up!! 18x9 +25 18x11 +25 Fronts will clear without a prob Roll and a 2mm pull on the rear fenders with -2.7 negative camber |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 12:18 AM | #9 | |
Banned
81
Rep 4,541
Posts |
Quote:
pcemk is on a e90 LCI + 7-8mm wider track at the hub so hes on a 11 +32 = to pre LCI e90 11 +25 Floss is on a e90 pre lci 11+25 Keep in mind due to the age of bushings and alignment machines some digital read out could read -2.4 up to -3 rear camber (max on the eccentric bolt) Both above are E90's 2-3mm wider than e92 ( I know few mm big deal but it only takes 1mm difference from rub or not). You stated "just a roll" while they added a mild pull. If you reference an actual e92 on 11 +22 (Jstech car on 19's) hes on rolled fenders 245/35 and still witnessing rub granted hes not on max rear camber about -2.0-2.2 rears. Hes poking 3mm more than yours with a more aggressive stretch and still rubs but not as slammed as you wanted. Everyone wants this "flush" look but to chicken from a lil rub here and there and the ohhh noooo camber "wears my tires" (yes if you sit there and spin them) I'll post pix of my rear tires after 10k of max rear camber (has about 85% tread left) ONLY cause I compensated TOE. Theres trade offs to everything so just deal with it. Dont even waste your time with the 10+25 in the rears unless you normal flush look, put them on the fronts or a spare and run a 12 +35 rears Last edited by Tee212; 06-01-2011 at 03:07 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|