|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Mixing E85 into 91 Octane? [Running PROcede]
|
|
12-19-2013, 12:46 AM | #1 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Mixing E85 into 91 Octane? [Running PROcede]
I have been browsing through older threads and saw quite a few people mixing E85 into their 91 Octane (In Cali)...
I'm a bit confused, can we all do this to increase the octane level of out fuel? What issues/safe? What ratios? Gains? My mods as of right now: PROcede Running 7-29 Autotuning (Always running in MAP 1) DCI Chargepipe/TiAL [2009 E92 N54] Thanks everyone!
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
12-19-2013, 01:19 AM | #2 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Is it 30/70 Ratios? That's what i've been reading...
If we have a 16.xx gallon tank, it would be safe to say to achieve a level of 30% I would need to add 4.8 gallons of E85 (if there is no pre-existing E85/91 blend in the tank.) I would like to run it mainly before going to the track: Would I be able to add 2.4 gallons of E85 and fill it my tank to the 1/2 Level with 91 Octane [8 gallons of 95 Octane Fuel], run in Map 1(or 2?) letting it Auto-tune for the 30 mile route to the track...
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] Last edited by SINGH_; 12-19-2013 at 01:29 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 07:55 AM | #3 |
Colonel
130
Rep 2,291
Posts |
Use the calculator on the bottom of this page labeled "Octane result from blending 2 fuels".
http://www.intercepteft.com/calc.html For safety's sake, assume the blend of e85 is about e70 because of reformulation for winter blends. A ratio of about 3/7 is usually pretty good for most people and will likely not max out your fuel. You will need to log your fuel trims to determine your car's fueling limitations. I would manually set my timing and boost. Set one map for regular gas, and map 2 for e85. Of course, the map for e85 will have increased timing and boost. Another option is to run the e85 maps from Vishnu's site. Be careful to never run the e85 map while running regular gas. Enjoy the corn. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 08:30 AM | #4 | |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
So my autotuning maps wouldn't be able to support a 30 percent mix of E85? Is there anyway I can make modifications to certain parameters in Map 2 on the user tuning interface to make it better suited for the fuel blend, looking to keep the autotuning enabled (inexperienced tuner) and the same map set (because I would be only fueling with E85 time to time). Thanks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 12:20 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
22
Rep 414
Posts |
E20 should be enough to bring 91 oct up to 93. When I was doing this I was mixing between 2-3 gal per tank depending on how empty it was. Don't forget to log to make sure its happy.
__________________
"And just one question I might ask yah, and it might sound like A disaster, can you make this thing go faster?"
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 03:26 PM | #6 |
Major General
161
Rep 7,377
Posts |
Its not about octane but higher knock resistance with ethanol and direct injection. E30 is fine for the oem fuel system . U need to log both map 1 and 2 and see how timings look like
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 09:27 PM | #7 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
What channels should I log? Logging it tonight for both Map 1 and Map 2, will post images and the datalog files tonight
Thanks for the help everyone!
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 11:00 PM | #8 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Do the 7-29 autotune maps adjust for E85? I was under the impression it was more just for the mods you were running but I could be wrong.
You could try running the 50% E85 9-10 aggressive maps. I'm running the 9-10 pump fuel stage 3 maps and I'm FBO with meth. I hit a max of 16-17psi with start boost on 65% and still pulled 309.9kW on a dyno dynamics roller. Stock dyno was 186kW. I'd love to try the E85 maps but gotta get my brakes working properly first haha.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2013, 11:02 PM | #9 | |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 12:08 AM | #10 |
Captain
135
Rep 692
Posts |
Ethanol will allow for a much more aggressive tune to be run safely. Just make sure to monitor your fuel trims (Long & Short term) to make sure you're not maxing them out and running the motor lean.
I'm not sure how the PROcede reads AFR (if it converts Lambda to AFR), but you'll want to keep it under 13 at all times. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 12:28 AM | #11 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
looks like i missed a few channels, let me know if this can give you guys in idea if im running at safe levels:
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 12:40 AM | #12 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
MAP 1 Datalog (30/70 Blend):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing MAP 2 Datalog (30/70 Blend): https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 01:06 AM | #13 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Also, I saw alot of people talking about maxing fuel trims and setting open loop/OL to 100%. What does OL do, mine is set to 0 as it came in the downloaded map.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 01:42 AM | #14 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
It's no good. Boost is all over the shop and fuel trims are maxed.
There are 3 possible causes. 1. 7-29 maps were not designed for E85 blends. 2. You need to raise the OL fueling. What is it at now? 3. Your fuel system is tired and cannot cope with an E20/30 blend. Most likely it is one of the first 2.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 11:34 AM | #15 |
Captain
135
Rep 692
Posts |
I hate PROcede logs, but I can easily read that the Fuel Trims are maxed (=34%) and that boost curve is all over.
Take logs on just pump gas and see how they compare. If your fuel trims (Short or Long) are in the 20s on Pump, you've got a fueling problem that needs to be addressed before you run E85 again. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 11:57 AM | #16 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Oh nooo, they didn't look right to me either but wasn't sure.
My OL fueling is at 0%, should I change it? 100%? Let me know then I can datalog the vehicle again for you guys. Would/how would the OL fueling help? All the help is much appropriated! Last edited by SINGH_; 12-20-2013 at 12:50 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 02:07 PM | #17 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Just did some new runs with the OL Fueling set to 100%, what do you guys think?
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 02:21 PM | #18 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
the files:
MAP 1 Datalog (12-20-13): https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing MAP 2 Datalog (12-20-13): https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 02:49 PM | #19 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Air/Fuel Ratios seem a bit better, but the Fuel Trims still seem maxed... is everything within safe levels to drive around/get on the throttle? is my OL set too high? how would would I go about fixing my fuel trims?
Doesn't seem like the Vishnu crew gives support on the forums much anymore, everything seems juice box dominated. I've shot them email asking for support. Hope fully they chime in and help a customer out.
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] Last edited by SINGH_; 12-20-2013 at 02:57 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 05:14 PM | #20 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Your fuel trims are atill maxed and the AFR and boost is still all over the place. It's still ok good.
My serious suggestion for you would be to use the 9-10 aggressive E85 maps on their stock settings. It requires a 50% E85 to pump fuel ratio but you'd be better off doing that than messing around with old maps which have likely been fiddled with.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 05:28 PM | #21 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
This is by ok means a direct comparison to your car but it's an example of a nicer looking datalog.
http://datazap.me/u/froop/20131207-a...-6-7-8-9-10-11 This was running the OTS 9-10 Stage 3 Aggressive map. The only thing I changed on the user adjustable map was to turn on PWM meth, meth injection mode to 43, start boost map 2 to 65% and ignition correction to 100% as per the recommended settings. As you can see, my boost curve is very smooth as are my AFT curves which start lean at around 14-15 at the beginning of the pull and gradually enrich down to around 11-12. My fuel trims are maxed for a bit but further into the pull they are well below. I sent this to Vishnu and they advised me to increase start boost to 80% and increase OL fueling to 100% after which I'll datalog again. This should hopefully push map 2 boost targets closer to 18-19psi and stop fuel trims from maxing out. Once I'm happy with them I'll try out their E85 9-10 maps. But yeah, as I said earlier, I believe your main problem is running either messed up 7-29 maps or you shouldn't be running those maps at all with E85 blends. Although an 50% E85 mix sounds a bit much, that's actually equivalent to an E42.5 mix which a healthy stock fuel system should be able to handle.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2013, 02:39 PM | #22 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Thank you for all the help froop, I stalked to Vishnu. They said not to run e85 with the 7-29 setup, so I diluted my mixture by adding 7 gal of 91 octane last night, plan on running the tank near dry and fueling back up to a full thank. Then I will be posting new datalogs so we can establish a solid base on the 7-29 tunes using just 91 octane. Then if everything looks solid, see how well vishnus 50/50 blend maps for me. I'm suspecting even the 7-29 trims on 91 will be giving me issues...
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|