|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Eibach vs H&R
|
|
01-14-2013, 11:11 AM | #1 |
Private
2
Rep 51
Posts |
Eibach vs H&R
Hey
Getting my e92 320d msport in a few weeks. After looking at the car it is low as standard but would like it to be lower. Most people iv seen on forums are saying Ebaich Pro or H&R Sport. Which one lowers the most and give the lowest stance?? Pics please |
01-15-2013, 03:06 PM | #2 |
Colonel
1615
Rep 2,160
Posts |
sorry, no pics but i put on H&R sports and my E90 looked slammed (i.e., rears were tucking). in fact, it was too much for my taste so i switched to the eibachs and haven't looked back.
oddly enough, i've seen pics of E90s on H&R race that were similar to my sports. guessing it depends partly on your shocks. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2013, 12:06 PM | #4 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 177
Posts |
H&R Sport Springs should lower about 1.3 in the front and 1.2 in the rear. Race Springs are about %50 more drop or 2 in the front and 1.8 in the rear.
We do a lot of H&R Sport Springs in our shop on e90 and e92s that look great.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2013, 01:07 PM | #5 |
Private
2
Rep 51
Posts |
Im thinking of getting the race h&r, just woundering if i would need to change the shockers i have msport but not sure if they will sit on the bumpstops with the race springs. Also weither i would need to roll arches, im keeping the mv4 225m 19" wheels for now.
Cheers Stotty |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|