E90Post
 


The Tire Rack
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Photography/Videography > need help revamping my lens setup



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-25-2010, 07:32 PM   #1
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

need help revamping my lens setup

Hey guys,

Right now I have a Canon 20D which I hope to upgrade sometime next year when the 7D's replacement gets released. In order to get ready for that, and be able to use the lens on my current body, I'm looking into my lens bag and debating on changing things up.

Currently, I have the following lenses:
  1. Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM (my everyday workhorse lens)
  2. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (mostly for portraits, but I don't use it often enough unfortunately)
  3. Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (telephoto)
  4. Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM (macro, which I rarely use)

I'm looking for an everyday kind of lens. I'm thinking about maybe replacing my current L lens (#1 above) with something else. Two possible options that I came up with are:
  1. Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
  2. Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

What do you guys suggest I do? Thanks for your help!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-25-2010, 09:00 PM   #2
bosstones
Lieutenant Colonel
1144
Rep
1,532
Posts

Drives: o_0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Suburbia

iTrader: (0)

Between the two options listed, I'd go with the 16-35L. However, that is because I mostly shoot wide angle and with a crop I need as wide a lens as I can get. 24-70 is a more versatile range. If I remember correctly the 7D's crop factor is 1.3, not 1.6 like the other crop cams from Canon. That'll help a little at the wide end but not by too much....unless the 7D's replacement has less of a crop factor.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-25-2010, 09:07 PM   #3
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Thanks for you input. I have the same feeling, where I may miss the lower range of my current lens.

I think the 7D actually has a 1.6 crop factor as well, unfortunately.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 01:28 AM   #4
scollins
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
scollins's Avatar
134
Rep
2,371
Posts

Drives: 2024 X3 M40i
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Renton, WA

iTrader: (3)

I'm a Nikon shooter, so things don't exactly match up, but....

My lenses on a D300 (1.5x crop) are
17-35 f2.8
50mm f1.8
70-200 VR f2.8

I love the 17-35, especially since it has a ridiculous close focus ability (11", from the back!) I'm sure the Canon delivers similar image results.

But, that zoom gap from 35mm to 70mm has caused me some problems in certain situations. I was shooting my daughter's pre-school graduation, and the 24-70 was the lens I needed. The 17-35 was too short, the 70-200 was too long, and the 50mm wasn't versatile enough. I couldn't move forward/back to frame shots, since every other parent was trying to get shots too.

So I'm probably going to add the 24-70 at some point, and I may even sell the 17-35 and go with the 14-24, especially if I step up to a D700 or other Nikon full-frame. But the 17-35 has the advantage in being able to take filters that the 14-24 does not.

Anyway, not that much of that does you any good for deciding on Canon lenses. So it comes down to what you shoot the most I suppose. If the 17-40 is your main "go to" lens, and you don't feel like you are coming up short, then go for the 16-35. But if you are always thinking "if I could just get a few more mm's out of this thing", then certainly choose the 24-70mm.

Better yet, keep the 17-40, sell the 100mm Macro and get the 24-70! Don't know if the budget supports that though...
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles
2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White
2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 09:25 AM   #5
vachss
Captain
54
Rep
815
Posts

Drives: Z4 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (1)

There's no right answer because it depends on what you shoot. For a 1.6x crop body though it's hard to go wrong with some of the higher end EF-S lenses:

10-22 (if you like wide)
17-55 (general purpose)

These are EF-S lenses that I'd consider "L without the red ring". The 17-55 is a more direct replacement for your 17-40 - not to mention being faster, sharper (on a crop frame) and with IS. The 10-22 is more of a specialty lens, but very good if you like ultrawide.

Your other lenses are all fine choices in the narrow "sharp but not crippling expensive" Canon camp.
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 09:38 AM   #6
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Thanks for your input guys. I think I just need to go Dodd Camera with my 20D and 17-40mm lens and play with some new ones there.

I actually did try out the EF-S 10-22 for a week before. It's a nice lens, but I'm not sure if I want to spend money on an EF-S incase I go full frame down the line. But perhaps that's too far in the future, and I'm sure I can resell that EF-S down the line as well.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 09:44 AM   #7
Trijicon
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
280
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

I would go for the 16-35L, for two reasons already mentioned. You're on a 1.6 crop body and you may be going to FF, the 16-35L will be an even better lense.

I've had the 16-35L for my 30D, 40D, 1Dmk2n, and now the 5Dmk2. So I've been on all crop sizes. The lense is my workhorse. I do like to shoot on the wide end alot.

I'd stay away from the current 24-70L, too many quality issues. I've had 4 in my life time and all had to be returned and calibrated and still was not a sharp lense. I ended up ditching it and getting a 85L. Later, consider maybe the Tamron 28-75 if you miss that range, I heard good things about it.
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 09:54 AM   #8
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Thanks for your suggestion. I'm actually leaning towards that one as well. But, how well will that lens do for portraits, etc? It's pretty wide, so I don't know how well it'll work for an everyday kind of lens?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 10:06 AM   #9
Trijicon
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
280
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
Thanks for your suggestion. I'm actually leaning towards that one as well. But, how well will that lens do for portraits, etc? It's pretty wide, so I don't know how well it'll work for an everyday kind of lens?
That's what the 50mm is for! (I know its tough to switch lenses on the fly) You should be able to get away with the 16-35L at the 35mm end, but still watch out for distortion. On a 20D, the crop might take care of the edge distortion. I usually never shoot people with my 16-35L on the 5D2, the distortion is too crazy.

You should try and commit yourself to the 50 for portraits. Try it for your next dinner party or get together. Its great for sniping candids too.
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 10:14 AM   #10
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trijicon View Post
That's what the 50mm is for! (I know its tough to switch lenses on the fly) You should be able to get away with the 16-35L at the 35mm end, but still watch out for distortion. On a 20D, the crop might take care of the edge distortion. I usually never shoot people with my 16-35L on the 5D2, the distortion is too crazy.

You should try and commit yourself to the 50 for portraits. Try it for your next dinner party or get together. Its great for sniping candids too.
Yeah, I know. I'm just so used to zoom lenses, that prime's are a little hassle to get just right... but I guess that's what post-processing in Aperture is for, right? Plus it looks so damn funny installed on a large camera body (since I have a battery grip too).

I'll play with the 16-35L later today at the shop too and see how things look. I figured there would be some distortion at the 35mm end, but I'll see if it's something I can live with. Thanks man.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 11:47 AM   #11
bosstones
Lieutenant Colonel
1144
Rep
1,532
Posts

Drives: o_0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Suburbia

iTrader: (0)

I have a portrait shot at home I could post up. I stopped by the Getty Center before a flight home eariler this year and was curious how the 16-35L compared with the 85mm for a portrait shot. I grabbed a pic of one of the birds of paradise flowers they had. I can post it up tonight if you're interested.

I tend to shoot wide so that's why I went with the 16-35 eariler this year. I do miss my 10-22 sometimes, though. That is a great lens for my crop body.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 11:54 AM   #12
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Sure Jeff, that would be great... bird of paradise are pretty cool flowers
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-26-2010, 06:23 PM   #13
inabis
Captain
inabis's Avatar
281
Rep
955
Posts

Drives: E90
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Daytona Beach->Denver->Seattle->The Bay

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2006 325i  [0.00]
I bought my 7D a little while back and have the following

10-22mm
24-70mmL
50mm 1.4

the 7D and the 24-70 give me some amazingly sharp pics. Sorry Trijicon for your experience, that really sucks. This lens is amazing!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2010, 12:13 AM   #14
bosstones
Lieutenant Colonel
1144
Rep
1,532
Posts

Drives: o_0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Suburbia

iTrader: (0)

Okay, so not quite an apples/apples comparison since the lighting is different and what not but here is a shot with the 16-35L @ 30mm and one with the 85mm prime. All I did was resize down to a max dimension of 800 pixels horizontally (no unsharp max after resizing, either). I included links to the originals if you're curious what the full sized looks like.

85mm prime:

original w/ 85mm prime

16-35L (@ 30mm):

original w/ 16-35L @ 30mm
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2010, 05:33 AM   #15
ichiban
Colonel
ichiban's Avatar
94
Rep
2,012
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

sell everything(cept maybe the 50). Get 17-55 2.8 IS , and tokina 11-16 2.8, buy both used, you'll probably need to add some money in still. The lenses will hold their value, so when you go FF, you can unload them for pretty much how much you paid for them. And the Tokina can be used as a 16mm fixed on FF fyi.
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2010, 09:52 AM   #16
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Thanks for the pics Jeff. I actually went down to my local camera store yesterday and checked out both the EF 16-35mm and the EF 24-70mm L lenses. I think for an everyday sort of lens the EF 24-70mm one would be best. After playing with it, the f/2.8 aperture was awesome.

Ichiban, that Tokina is pretty sweet and would fit the bill for my landscape pictures. Where do you recommend I purchase a used one? Any suggestions on where would be a good place to sell lenses too?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2010, 01:09 PM   #17
remmib
General
remmib's Avatar
Norway
1566
Rep
29,202
Posts

Drives: 2013 F10 520d M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by inabis View Post
I bought my 7D a little while back and have the following

10-22mm
24-70mmL
50mm 1.4

the 7D and the 24-70 give me some amazingly sharp pics. Sorry Trijicon for your experience, that really sucks. This lens is amazing!
LOL, that's exactly what I've got and the 70-200 f/2.8L IS.
__________________

F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3DDesign Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals |
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2010, 03:19 PM   #18
ichiban
Colonel
ichiban's Avatar
94
Rep
2,012
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
Ichiban, that Tokina is pretty sweet and would fit the bill for my landscape pictures. Where do you recommend I purchase a used one? Any suggestions on where would be a good place to sell lenses too?
photography-on-the.net is a pretty good place, and fredmiranda.cm is ggood as well. and then of course there's craigslist.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST