|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Catless DPS with JB4, Need 02 sim to pass smog?
|
|
10-24-2013, 02:39 AM | #1 |
Private
7
Rep 56
Posts |
Catless DPS with JB4, Need 02 sim to pass smog?
Hi, I have been reading up for the past 2 hours on all the threads concerning this,
I live in NV where they just do a obd scan I just ordered a set of catless DPS and am wondering if JB4's built in Code clearing will pass smog, from what i understand it will not because the system will not read "ready" So I believe i need the BMS 02 SIM and then it will pass smog? Can i make one of these myself for 2.00$ like vishnu has shown here http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151315 Also There IS a difference between BMW 02 sim and BMW DP fix correct? I could only seem to find DP fix on there website and it says that it is not needed if you have a JB4... I know my roomate welded a Cheap universal 02 sim into his Subaru and he passed smog, can I do something similar? Anyone with knowledge on the Subject I REALLY REALLY appreciate your input, dont feel like replacing DPS everytime i smog. thanks! Last edited by Excorcist; 10-24-2013 at 02:49 AM.. |
10-24-2013, 07:49 AM | #4 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
24180
Rep 190,777
Posts |
You need the DP fix, we can help
__________________
Check out our current sale by clicking on this link!
https://x-ph.com/sale/ Phone number 702-494-9435 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2013, 07:51 AM | #5 |
Brigadier General
1254
Rep 4,088
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2013, 10:20 AM | #6 |
Captain
234
Rep 990
Posts |
There is a need. Confirmed by BMS, even on the 11pm setting it is not fully of and they highly recommend to take it out FYI.
__________________
2010 Alpine White E90 335i RWD 6MT M/Premium/Cold
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2013, 12:48 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
1254
Rep 4,088
Posts |
So why doesn't the fact that the rear sensors are now seeing un-catalyzed emissions screw up trims even more?
Last edited by ashmostro; 10-24-2013 at 01:29 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2013, 02:45 PM | #14 |
Enlisted Member
0
Rep 39
Posts |
Read through the thread.
Main reason for sims to supposedly cause problem is that post cat narrowband o2 sensors are used to calibrate the wideband sensors. It seems that there are 2 opinions on how the sims create problems: 1. Post cat signals are summed/mixed with sims and hence do not allow for fuel trims/o2 sensors to be adapted ber bank. 2. It is stated in the thread that sims cut down the lo/hi transitions of the post cat sensors to create cat-like output values. This can cause wideband o2 sensor calibration to go off. My take on this: For the 1. This is plausible if sims actually do this. This could be avoided if the sims handled banks individually (I do not know if there are such that do or if this is the default way they work). For the 2. This is plausible if this is how the sims work. I thought they were quite simplistic adjustable resistor that just trims the o2 signal strength which should not cause any calibration issues. So does anyone have hard fact on how the o2 sensors work : simple resistor or more advanced logic? Post thoughts: The o2 sims would obviously not work the way cats do in wot/full throttle closure situations and those might be the times that some calibration is indeed made so even in the case of simplistic resistor they might indeed cause a problem. Conclusion (note to self) use sims only for passing inspection for best results. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2013, 02:52 PM | #15 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 149
Posts |
when i went through the emissions testing; i forgot to turn the jb4 map to 0. After several attempts the emission's person could not get the computer to communicate and then used the sniffers. At this point I thought I wasn't going to pass because I have catless downpipes. The results came in and I passed the sniffers because our cars have two sets of cats. next time I will remember to turn the JB4 to map 0
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2013, 02:52 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
1254
Rep 4,088
Posts |
Your points are good, but exclude the important fact that the input criteria shifts depending on the test being performed, and that is why sims - which are just pots- are unable to satisfy both conditions.
a) when the engine is accelerating, the secondary sensors are looking for a certain amount of reduction in O2 compared the the primaries, which correlates to cat efficiency. If there's too much O2 left then the cats are below target efficiency and a cat code is tripped. DP fix addresses this. b) when decelerating, the engine is pumping O2 and can be trimmed with just enough fuel for the secondaries to be pinged for stoich (since they are narrowband sensors stoich is easy to find, and doesn't drift). That's what the pre-cat widebands are re-calibrated to and also what the O2 sims cannot...simulate |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2013, 03:02 PM | #17 |
Major
162
Rep 1,264
Posts |
Do you have a citation for this? The PDF for the DPFix states "with 11pm disabling the DPFIX all together."
__________________
2010|335i|LMB|E92|6MT|MSport|Logic7|335is Clutch|AE Performance|BMS|Walbro|VRSF 7"| 149.7mph NFZ AZ 1/2mi
1992|Pontiac Firebird|Mild 355ci|T56| -I will look on your treasures, gypsy. Is this understood?- |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2013, 10:56 PM | #19 |
Major
162
Rep 1,264
Posts |
Thanks I'm familiar with that thread but did not see where Terry or anyone states turning to 11 doesn't disable the dpfix. Did you interpret otherwise? Just wondering.
__________________
2010|335i|LMB|E92|6MT|MSport|Logic7|335is Clutch|AE Performance|BMS|Walbro|VRSF 7"| 149.7mph NFZ AZ 1/2mi
1992|Pontiac Firebird|Mild 355ci|T56| -I will look on your treasures, gypsy. Is this understood?- |
Appreciate
0
|
11-11-2013, 08:41 AM | #21 |
I'd hit it
1065
Rep 1,106
Posts |
If the guy who's name is on the fix says to take it out... I don't question it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|