|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Technical: Supplemental Port Injection
|
|
03-17-2013, 10:58 PM | #1 | ||
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
Technical: Supplemental Port Injection
So with the VTTS3 on the horizon, we can once again see our fueling limits. With turbo options and boost capabilities beyond the capacity of our fuel system we can sit here and wait for the unicorn HPFP upgrade that never seems to appear or find our own solutions. From my chair, I see two options:
1) Wait for ProEFI, pony up for the Standalone + Custom Intake Manifold 2) Fabricate a TB Spacer and/or custom CP with a single Supplemental Batch Fire injector controlled by a piggy. I'm personally leaning toward option #2 in terms of wide spread adoption. Our DME is smart enough to compensate for the lack of extreme precision batchfire through a piggyback would provide and reduces the overall cost of getting more REAL fuel into the combustion chamber. I personally have brought this up and @shiv@vishnu and co and he has mentioned that this is possible however I feel that there is another agenda there blocking this option. It is not the best option but its a solution to a huge problem holding this platform back. If he were to change his mind and provide a product then I would be surprised. So at this point I think I'm going to challenge Terry@BMS and ask, are you capable of introducing this injector? It would show the true flexibility of a piggyback I think we just need to do it already. Comments? UPDATE: A reputable shop in the Van Nuys area has offered to make a spacer for us to test if he can get a mule car! Quote:
Also, if the piggy tuners won't step up and offer this, then here is a controller that will do the job and have made contact with an individual who has used this controller before and says it will work. We may need an external boost sensor as an addon: http://www.034motorsport.com/supplem...-ecu-a-32.html Quote:
|
||
03-17-2013, 11:21 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
202
Rep 1,950
Posts
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: FortWorth, Texas
|
leaving the direct injection is not the way to go. the engine was not designed for port injection. + wet walling will be an issue when we start dumping serious fuel into the pistons.
and you can just use the NOS relay on the jb4 it will activate the injector @ 3k rpms i think and supply the fuel needed. the used it for the air intake meth injection. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 12:24 AM | #3 |
Captain
14
Rep 961
Posts |
My personal opinion on this is that the only way to have a reliable long lasting solution is to have a HPFP that can keep up with the fueling demand. We don't have that yet but now that there is a need a solution may soon follow. Having a secondary PI system isn't a bad idea, but it's just not the right idea.
I feel like if someone were to SERIOUSLY inquire about an upgraded pump(IE cash in hand, not "just wondering") then they just may be able to get the ball rolling with a company like Autotech or someone similar
__________________
"I'm not surprised you get along well with all the other neighbours. If you put fifty children with Down's syndrome in a room there is going to be a lot of hugging." David Thorne
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 03:00 AM | #4 |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
I'll make the same replies. Get back to me when your upgraded fuel pump is here. With that said, this company makes a controller pecifically for this purpose. Whose in van Nuys area with an hours time for measurements?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 01:29 PM | #5 | |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
Update, got a new message. There is already a controller they make which will be able to work with the new hardware. Just need someone to lend a car and then a few people willing to test out the prototypes.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 05:31 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
5
Rep 538
Posts |
Don't look now, but what you describe is already installed and working on many 335's.
They have suppemental injectors, external pump plumbed with a dedicated fuel line, controlled by piggyback, injects high octane fuel, and proven to make great power. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 06:02 PM | #7 |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
And whose 335's are these?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 06:04 PM | #8 |
Captain
14
Rep 961
Posts |
Everyone running meth injection lol
__________________
"I'm not surprised you get along well with all the other neighbours. If you put fifty children with Down's syndrome in a room there is going to be a lot of hugging." David Thorne
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 06:08 PM | #9 |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
This is a good point, as the DME has shown to dynamically adjust trims well, and bodes well for this solution. E85 through a proper TBI > Meth through 4 bungs throughout the intake system. I don't see Meth taking us from 550hp to 900.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 06:21 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant
5
Rep 538
Posts |
haha sorry to be such a tease, but yeah I was talking about meth injection.
But seriously, why not meth injection? We already have enough fuel for stock turbos through the stock fuel system, any extra fuel needed above that power level will most likely need to be higher octane fuel. Perhaps we should be looking at ways to take the standard meth injection kit up to the next level? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2013, 06:45 PM | #11 | |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
Quote:
Using Meth as an octane additive and or an IAT suppressor is fine. Thats what its best at. Using it as a crutch to replace fueling for 100's of horsepower just seems silly when its coming out of a plastic tank to me. Just my .02 cents. lets use a real fuel injector, real fuel pump and fuel from the tank we don't have to refill or clean. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2013, 03:52 PM | #12 |
Slow.
3782
Rep 7,151
Posts
Drives: Single Turbo N54 on Meth!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
oh hai
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2013, 08:11 PM | #13 | |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2013, 10:34 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 564
Posts |
Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550/560/570's use direct-injection. Since I work at Lamborghini Newport Beach, I can inquire about pricing. I'll try and remember to ask our parts guy the price.
__________________
07 AW E92 335 6MT [18" OEM 193's For Sale, PM me] OEM Aero Lip | OEM Gloss Black Kidney Grills | KW V2 | Vorsteiner CSL trunk | M-Tech Rear Bumper | LCI Rear Taillights | Angel ibright Angel Eyes | 3000K HID fogs | 6000k HID low beams | AFE DCI | Full LED conversion |
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 09:06 AM | #15 | |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 02:21 PM | #16 | |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
Quote:
Oh, so you must know all the details of this project? That means you also should know it uses two injectors. You are making a pretty novice mistake by assuming that the injectors on this car are limited to as you say, "117hp" per injector. Firstly, the injectors on this car can flow a hell of a lot more than that. Who said the injectors were the problem? Apparently you are and that just shows how off base you are. They aren't the issue. The rest of the fueling system is the issue. You also assume we would use the same kind of injector. Why in the world would anyone put a direct injection injector into a Throttle Body spacer? You are clueless apparently. Go get some facts on how much power a single port injector can handle, double that and then get back to me. If thats not enough 'supplemental' fuel on top of what the existing fuel system can do, then maybe you should tell me what your expectations are. The shop making this spacer has made the system fuel a supercharged Aston Martin Vantage V8 up to 550hp on just the two additional injectors, but apparently you have done more and know more. Are you trying to tell me that Methanol is a better and more reliable fueling source than fuel coming out of the tank using a REAL injector with a fuel rail? Wow man. I've got nothing to say about that one. Uneven fueling? Do you even know what that means? Because I don't. You mean, supplemental fueling? Do you know what supplemental means? Not to mention, supplemental fueling can come from a dedicated tank in the trunk with its own pump if need be. Advocating supplmental fueling isn't synonomous with not using a secondary fuel cell if need be. You can have both and you are assuming that only methanol can do this. Not True. I ran meth on my car. I liked it. Anyone who knows anything about how injectors or fueling systems work would advocate a PROPERLY configured supplemental fueling system as an interim until we get a fully upgraded stock fuel system. Next... Last edited by klipseracer; 06-14-2013 at 02:32 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 02:36 PM | #17 |
Banned
219
Rep 3,012
Posts |
The status is: Someone needs to bring their car for an hour or so to Van Nuys for simple measurements for clearance. I've included a few photos of their work on the Vantage. The fueling works, and they can tune it. If someone wants fuel, PM me and I'll setup the meet.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 02:50 PM | #19 |
sudo su -
52
Rep 236
Posts |
I thought it was like a modification they did, not a whole new pump. They were pretty cryptic about it though, from what I remember. I was looking around for more information on this in general recently and didn't come up with much.
I could have sworn I remembered reading someone from Vargas saying something about fixing the fueling problem, and insinuating that the other tuners just hadn't figured it out yet. Last edited by Bluesun; 06-14-2013 at 02:58 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 02:54 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant
17
Rep 575
Posts |
From what I've read there are still fueling issues around 5500rpm. This is a very interesting thread gentleman. My faith in the internet is restored, keep it up!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 04:26 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant
5
Rep 538
Posts |
What size fuel injectors do you plan to run?
IMHO I would not want to run this type of system on regular pump gas. As power levels go up it's even more important to increase octane and cool the intake charge to prevent knock. I think we've already seen the limits of power on low octane fuels. I mean, if you want to prevent knock on low octane gas there is a limit to how much timing you can pull out and how rich you can make the AF ratio. 'Uneven fueling', I think that means each cylinder does not receive the same amount of fuel when it's injected at the throttle body. Modern intake manifolds are not designed to distribute fuel evenly, they don't have to since port or direct injection handles the fuel very evenly. Fuel is heavier than air, and it's more difficult for fuel to go around curves in the plenum without wetting the far wall. Uneven fueling is the reason some of the better meth injection kits are locating the injectors farther away from the TB, it helps dispersion and atomization. Also, one of the better meth kits on the market already uses pulse width modulation to control meth flow, just like a fuel injector. Tell me again how your idea is better? |
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 05:19 PM | #22 |
sudo su -
52
Rep 236
Posts |
The big HP supras and Evos -- did they have to run higher octane and/or meth? Is it just a limit of how much you can compress pump gas before it starts detonating? Is it really just a fueling problem at this point? Forgive my ignorance, and thanks in advance to anyone that takes the time to help explain this to me.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|