|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Magnaflow 12148 vs 12138 vs 14815
|
|
08-02-2022, 12:51 PM | #23 |
Private First Class
43
Rep 109
Posts |
I really don't mean that a 4-stroke engine needs back pressure. But the collector is just as important as the headers and you have to think of the whole rest of the exhaust after the headers as a collector. Bigger is not always better.
But the exhaust rear section a 70mm diameter is certainly enough for a 300hp engine. Especially when the front and middle section is a double exhaust. If the Y-piece was immediately after the headers, then a 76mm single exhaust would be better. I just don't understand why my N52 does what I wrote before. Here is a comparison with the flap closed and open. Drove in the same place and direction, first with the flap closed and then open. Red= flap closed and Blue= flap open. I don't have exactly the same Log for the MD rear pipe. But the airmass shows that the loss is even slightly greater in the high rpm range. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2022, 02:08 PM | #24 |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
You can see you lost power with the flap closed (more back pressure) and OEM mufflers aren’t an upgrade, they don’t flow that well to begin with.
Your issue is likely the collector location - it’s too far back. You should move it towards the end of the transmission/drive shaft area (or even a tad closer) to the engine. It’s too far back to take advantage of proper scavenging. Finally, again, the piping diameter is only an issue prior to the collector, after the merger, there is no detriment by going larger, just smaller. Last edited by AmuroRay; 08-02-2022 at 02:26 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2022, 12:36 AM | #25 | |
Private First Class
43
Rep 109
Posts |
Quote:
I painted the front pipes with the old school methods and saw where the paint wears off first. And I also used Pipemax in the calculation. A good place for the Y piece would have been a little before the first bend. I didn't dare to do it. I was afraid I would lose low end torque, especially knowing I was going with the N54 intake. I read writings, e.g. e46 M3, where low torque was lost, after a new exhaust with a Y part near the headers was installed. I think a good place would have been to find the Y part by trying a different place and running a Dyno. I made a safe decision and went near Stock. As e.g. SuperSprint has done. Today I drove a little longer with the flap open. A few WOT pulls before the "Dyno" pull. I got better results with the flap open. I think it might be a matter of adapting a little. I'll try my test pipe sometime later. I need to install a straight through muffler on it. With which to get the sound down. Red = Flap open Blue= Flap closed Last edited by MOD.Works; 08-07-2022 at 12:52 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2022, 11:31 PM | #27 | |||
Private First Class
43
Rep 109
Posts |
Quote:
It depends on what Peak RPM uses in the calculation. This calculation is 6200RPM peak. The new version of Pipemax recommends large diameters for the exhaust pipe. Double pipe more than 2.5 inches and single 3.5 inches. I didn't go that big. I don't have all the cam specs for the N52B30. But I think I'm close enough. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
08-17-2022, 12:38 AM | #28 | |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Quote:
Peak power on the 3SIM is about 6500-6600R, and 7200RPM on the N54, you might have low balled yourself a bit. The cam specs can be found on the BMW technical manual for the N52/N54 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|