E90Post
 


The Tire Rack
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Helix 335i Traps a best of 113.1mph and best ET of 12.8



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-04-2007, 04:05 PM   #1
Helix Wildebeest
Helix Wildebeest's Avatar
United_States
16
Rep
217
Posts

Drives: 2003 Mini TurboKompressor
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Helix 335i Traps a best of 113.1mph and best ET of 12.8

Figured it was worth a thread of its own. The only speed mod was the Attache`. The first run was 93 octane. Then we put in some 103 oct. and the traps went up. A 113mph trap speed is equivalent to right around 400whp. See below.

Last edited by Helix Wildebeest; 11-06-2007 at 10:05 AM..
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 04:08 PM   #2
revah2
Lieutenant
35
Rep
555
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL

iTrader: (0)

putting my suit on.
I had a real good feeling about this tune $795.00- GG procede and Xede
Just curious about what it was trapping without the 103 octane.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 04:10 PM   #3
nico335
Guest
0
Rep
n/a
Posts

Drives:


is there any way you can enlarge them?
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 04:21 PM   #4
zenmaster
Brigadier General
United_States
1577
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: '17 M2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaRTan8 View Post
Then we put in some 103 oct. and the traps went up.
Does this mean you are relying on the knock sensor to tune the car?
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 04:22 PM   #5
revah2
Lieutenant
35
Rep
555
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL

iTrader: (0)

I'm seeing 109 and 111 trap speeds on the two left-most tickets- is that with or without the 103 octane
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 04:36 PM   #6
BoostedBMW
Moderator
BoostedBMW's Avatar
United_States
132
Rep
6,775
Posts

Drives: TiAg E92 335
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC

iTrader: (14)

Garage List
2003 S2000  [0.00]
I just want to know what it ran on 93... was that the 12.8 run?
__________________
-Michael.
Berlina Black S2000 CR is now in the garage

l 19" Rial Daytona Race l KW V2 l Eisenhaus Race Exhaust l
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 05:04 PM   #7
revah2
Lieutenant
35
Rep
555
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL

iTrader: (0)

um, bump.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:01 PM   #8
1clean335i
Perf BMW mag issue 147, 159
1clean335i's Avatar
Vietnam
414
Rep
6,803
Posts

Drives: Project Estoril
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Miami, FL

iTrader: (31)

Garage List
thats a nice trap speed!
__________________
'13 Estoril Blue 335i M-sport
*Don't PM me!* Message me here- http://www.facebook.com/ProjectEstoril
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:13 PM   #9
Evo8MRto335I
Captain
Evo8MRto335I's Avatar
Spain
40
Rep
983
Posts

Drives: can't list them all
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson

iTrader: (1)

I might need glasses to look at the timeslip but correct me if I am wrong, is the far right timeslip showing a 60' of 2.4ish?
I think the car is capable of more, perhaps mid 12's. If you could perhaps make the attachemnet bigger then we could elaborate more on the runs.

Good runs by the way!
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:21 PM   #10
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

car ran 12.8@109 on pump gas with 2 gallons of 103 the trap increased to 111 then on the 3rd run 113mph. the ET's got slower(wheelspin on street tires) as the track surface got colder and the power increased from the octane.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:22 PM   #11
NYCGarbagePrince
Major
247
Rep
1,435
Posts

Drives: X6 50i
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

looks like you pulled a 113 trap by rolling off the line in 1st. Shiv put down a 110 or a 111 a while back by rolling off the line. However the 12.8 is fantastic looks like a 1.9 60'. Nice job
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:25 PM   #12
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zenmaster View Post
Does this mean you are relying on the knock sensor to tune the car?
we are modifying the timing and boost schedules on the attache but any modern fuel injected car will auto advance timing to a point with increased octane.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:27 PM   #13
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCGarbagePrince View Post
looks like you pulled a 113 trap by rolling off the line in 1st. Shiv put down a 110 or a 111 a while back by rolling off the line. However the 12.8 is fantastic looks like a 1.9 60'. Nice job
it wasn't a roll lol more like a tire melting take off... the track was prepped horribly with the grooves coned off(for the gamblers), street tires and cold weather make for crappy 60 fts. no excuses as i wasnt expecting much out of the ET's with the street tires and track prep.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:31 PM   #14
zenmaster
Brigadier General
United_States
1577
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: '17 M2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTurboBullett View Post
we are modifying the timing and boost schedules on the attache but any modern fuel injected car will auto advance timing to a point with increased octane.
I understand that all modern cars run on the edge of detonation to get the most power from the gas. But as the stock 335i would not make that much noticeable power when switching from 93 to 103, it begs the question of the piggyback running excess timing advance. I'm not an expert, just never seen that kind of response with just a change of gas.
nevermind: I see you had the settings changed on the piggyback...

Last edited by zenmaster; 11-04-2007 at 07:36 PM.. Reason: new info
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:35 PM   #15
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zenmaster View Post
I understand that all modern cars run on the edge of detonation to get the most power from the gas. But as the stock 335i would not make that much noticeable power when switching from 93 to 103, it begs the question of the piggyback running excess timing advance.
we didnt go from 93 to 103 as we added 2 gallons of 103 to about 4 gallons of 93. the traps increased partly due to the slower short track times as well as cooler air as the night went on in addition to the increased octane. I have not heard or logged one bit of knock on the car as of yet and have not thrown one dtc or code as well. in my experience tuning turbo cars i have seen a 20-50 hp increase depending on the setup and fuel used.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:41 PM   #16
zenmaster
Brigadier General
United_States
1577
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: '17 M2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTurboBullett View Post
we didnt go from 93 to 103 as we added 2 gallons of 103 to about 4 gallons of 93. the traps increased partly due to the slower short track times as well as cooler air as the night went on in addition to the increased octane. I have not heard or logged one bit of knock on the car as of yet and have not thrown one dtc or code as well. in my experience tuning turbo cars i have seen a 20-50 hp increase depending on the setup and fuel used.
I believe it. There are a lot of factors involved in a run and it would take many trials to actually isolate what the gain was from octane alone.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:49 PM   #17
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zenmaster View Post
I believe it. There are a lot of factors involved in a run and it would take many trials to actually isolate what the gain was from octane alone.
not just octane but fuel quality as well my S4 would pick up 35whp with no timing changes when running a few gallons of toluene mixed w/ 93 octane. and on the SPFWD race cars I have worked on would pick up 50+whp when running VP Import fuel over C16. as you may know if you have tuned factory engine management there is usually a base timing map this is where the car generally tries to run if a lower octane fuel is used or the ait's/coolant temps increase the timing may drop back to the low octane map. likewise if the aits and coolant temps are lower and the octane is increased the car can bump up the timing several degrees and in some cars switch to a high octane map. the difference in timing from the low octane map to the high octane map can be a swing of 10-15 degrees in some cases.
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:51 PM   #18
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

bigger timeslips


[IMG][/IMG]
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:55 PM   #19
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
148
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTurboBullett View Post
bigger timeslips


[IMG][/IMG]
Well, see this is all a bit misleading; with the larger timeslips that you can actually see, it's obvious that the 113mph trap was with the horrible 2.4x 60ft. and 13.5x sec. ET. The decent 12.8x sec. ET was with a 109.x mph trap speed and 1.9x sec. 60ft...all very good btw. So, what's the moral of this experience...that higher octane race gas really does wonders for these cars?
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:56 PM   #20
e90AW335i
Major General
United_States
137
Rep
6,608
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ......

iTrader: (4)

Nice stuff....keep us updated on everything concerning this new piggyback
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 07:57 PM   #21
DrDomer
Major
DrDomer's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
1,349
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci ZHP, 1999 Miata
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Iowa

iTrader: (0)

Impressive. Looking forward to more info. What boost did you say you're running?
__________________
Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. ~Albert Einstein
Appreciate 0
      11-04-2007, 08:00 PM   #22
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management
Major
TurboBullett@Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
80
Rep
1,283
Posts

Drives: 2012 Abarth 500
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDomer View Post
Impressive. Looking forward to more info. What boost did you say you're running?

the boost is "tuned" to run 11-13psi.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST