|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Why does the 335i community use STD dyno conversion methods instead of SAE conversion
|
|
12-23-2010, 02:27 AM | #1 |
Captain
77
Rep 665
Posts |
Why does the 335i community use STD dyno conversion methods instead of SAE conversion
I always wondered this. Most other car forums I visit use SAE method of converting dyno numbers, which is more conservative, and is supposed to more closely reflect real world driving conditions.
None of the American car owners/forums I know of dyno in STD. STD was always used by tuners or performance shops as a dyno trick to make their tunes or mods look like they make more power, since STD always dynos 3-4% higher than SAE. I've owned, modified and dynoed everything from Camaros to CTS-Vs to 335i's and now own an M5. It's just strange to me to see such a lack of consistency across car brand's owners. So I guess my quesiton for all the 335i owners and shop sponsors here....why STD? |
12-23-2010, 05:12 PM | #2 |
ahat
1036
Rep 2,592
Posts |
Im not sure why 12hp makes a difference one way or another- especially when its easly corrected.
__________________
'13 335IS N54 (1 of 373 LeMans Blue out of 3597 total production e92)- Grey interior (1 of 24 in LMB with any trans- 1 of 14 with DCT)-MODS -MFactory LSD/MHD-BQ custom Tune/ATM-IC/AFE Momentum GT Intake/Konis/Mfront&HeimJoint Rear rods&arms/Brembos. https://photos.app.goo.gl/Lo6aHZRo7XqtPkhL8 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2010, 09:08 PM | #3 | |
Captain
77
Rep 665
Posts |
Quote:
At the end of the day dynos are best used to compare one's own mods, so theoretically it should be a moot point, however people very frequently compare. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2010, 09:27 PM | #4 |
Major General
177
Rep 6,631
Posts |
It's a good question actually. The tuners and whoever else uses STD because the numbers are higher, period. Since the tuners set this precedent for our platform, most people continue using STD as their correction method.
But seriously, not a huge deal to guesstimate an SAE output. Just reduce whp by 3-4% like someone before me said. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2010, 09:30 PM | #5 | |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
Nothing is dyno'd in STD. It's just dyno'd and then STD is chosen afterwards to show the correction. SAE could be chosen just as easily before one posts the chart but since STD has paved the way then people seem to go with the same thing for comparison. There are so many people around here that love to measure their own P**** by the dynos so if anyone posts SAE then a lot of the people will overlook that and start talking trash on how bad the tune is bla bla...
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2010, 10:09 PM | #6 |
ahat
1036
Rep 2,592
Posts |
I would not recommend 'shopping' for a tune based which one has + 3-4percent max output. Too many things (not all documented or as easily determined as std/sae) can influence that.
__________________
'13 335IS N54 (1 of 373 LeMans Blue out of 3597 total production e92)- Grey interior (1 of 24 in LMB with any trans- 1 of 14 with DCT)-MODS -MFactory LSD/MHD-BQ custom Tune/ATM-IC/AFE Momentum GT Intake/Konis/Mfront&HeimJoint Rear rods&arms/Brembos. https://photos.app.goo.gl/Lo6aHZRo7XqtPkhL8 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2010, 12:25 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant
24
Rep 563
Posts |
I wouldnt really say numbers are inflated. Its more what temp the numbers are corrected to. Std is corrected to 60 degrees, 29.92 in/hg, while sae is 77 deg, 29.4 iirc. As long as one method is used consistently on the same car it doesnt really matter imo. Std is more common due to higher numbers. Dyno calibration is more of a concern vs correction factor. 2 of my local dynos read ~30whp different from eachother. So realistically, dynos are useless to compare #'s unless its all done on same dyno.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2010, 01:27 PM | #9 | |
Major
55
Rep 1,311
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2010, 01:51 PM | #10 |
Major General
3398
Rep 6,589
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 49417 and 60610
|
Uncorrected FTW...
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-29-2010, 01:23 AM | #13 |
Captain
77
Rep 665
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|