|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Epic MPG increase?
|
|
11-05-2012, 04:16 PM | #1 |
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Epic MPG increase?
I am unsure of what's going on, but my MPG is possibly getting very good compared to before. I reflashed my car with AA's stage 2 as well as put on 17x8" wheels with all season tires a week ago. Here is an INCOMPLETE breakdown of my setup and results.
My first gas tank: ~60 miles of breaking the tune in in the city (WOT, lots of stop-go) ~175 miles of highway cruising (no cruise control because mine is broken) ~80 miles of mixed driving. This includes 20 minutes of WOT road course where I overheated my car and held revs at 5000+ RPM for 10 minutes at a time. Also includes 4mph stop-go traffic. 14.5 gallons used 21.8 calculated MPG My 2nd tank (IN PROGRESS): ~55 miles of city driving. LOT of stop and go, very short distances, oil almost never fully warmed ~175 miles of highway @ 80+mph with windows/sunroof down. The progress SO FAR: Before: 19x8.5, 19x10.5" ADV.10 TrakFunction (51 pounds, rear, with TPMS) (unknown front weight) 235/35, 265/30 Nitto INVO summer tires, 34/36psi Eurocharged custom dyno tune 315 miles per tank w/ city driving 370 miles per tank with 340 of those miles being 100% highway After: 17x8" square OEM Style 157 (46 pounds combined, no TPMS) 225/45/17 Continental DWS all-season tires, 40psi 12mm H&R spacers (unknown weight) Active Autowerke updated canned tune (stage 2) I will be weighing the ADV.1 + Nitto combo tonight, as well as the 157+DWS+12mm spacer combo. If the weight is dramatically different, that could explain things. UPDATE 1: I weighed the 17's and rear 19's. The weight difference is surprisingly small... 19x10.5+265 tire = 51 pounds, 17x8+225 tire=46 pounds. How much can 5 pounds of unsprung weight decrease MPG?? I do realize that most fuel is burned getting off the line and can see how 5 pounds can affect it, but this seems a bit much. Also, I drove 8 miles and my estimated range went from 300 to 234. UPDATE 2: I completed the tank. Aside from 175 miles of cruising, the other 200 were almost entirely stop & go city driving. 379.6 miles to 15.1 gallons - 25.14mpg. That is BETTER than 350 miles of cruise control on my ADV's. UPDATE 3: I've completed a couple of tanks and they are all within 22-26mpg with a lot of gridlock traffic driving mixed in with 150-170 miles of cruising. My last tank was 22.8mpg with 170 miles of going 85-90mph + 45 minutes of road course. My current tank is showing massive gains. The 6AT loves 60mph. This is ~140 miles of nothing but 60-65 with no cruise control or braking. Tires set to 38/40 cold psi. CONCLUSION: Smaller contact patch, less aggressive compound (all season), and less overall weight have DRAMATICALLY increased my mpg.
__________________
Last edited by Hooy; 11-20-2012 at 02:19 AM.. |
11-05-2012, 05:15 PM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
21
Rep 270
Posts |
Perhaps the AA tune is a bit better. Since you've had both, can you comment on if the AA stage 2 is better than the EC tune?
__________________
Sakhir Orange M4||()
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 05:16 PM | #3 |
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
I really don't want to get into that in this thread. I will report back with wheel weights by tonight.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 06:28 PM | #4 |
Major
64
Rep 1,087
Posts
Drives: 2006 BMW 325i
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hot Springs, AR
|
I know the stock wheels are heavy also, but I gained 3-5mpg when I was on my stock 161s for a few weeks. When I put my v710s back on it shot back down.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 08:54 PM | #8 |
Captain
91
Rep 611
Posts |
those 265 summer tire vs 225 all season alone could kill your mpg already
__________________
N51- PI - PE - ESS Tuned - SSK - CDV Delete - AFE Header - B12 - Mfactory LSD
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 08:54 PM | #9 | ||
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Quote:
The 157 + DWS weighs ~46 pounds. I am going to weigh the ADV1's soon.
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 09:00 PM | #10 |
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
yes, that is my suspicion! Weighing them soon.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 09:48 PM | #11 |
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Updated with wheel weights... Results are surprising. how can 5 pounds affect my mpg so much?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2012, 09:57 PM | #12 |
boku no namae ha...
336
Rep 11,025
Posts
Drives: 2006 BS 330i
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: S. Bay Area, CA + Newark, NJ + ChiCity + True Blue
|
this
__________________
looking for a PreLCI Black Sapphire e90 front bumper without license plate holes
"Akimbo shotguns. Broken wrists anyone? And don't give me that 'it's just a game' bull****. Where the **** are my akimbo interventions then?! One scope on each eye mother****er!!" |
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 02:24 PM | #14 | |
ALL RIGHTY THEN
222
Rep 2,957
Posts |
Quote:
and although the mpg calculator in our cars are nice, just keep track of how many miles you run on a full tank (or whenever you fill up). that'll give you a more accurate calculation.
__________________
BMW CCA Member 483866
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 02:32 PM | #15 |
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep 277
Posts
Drives: 06 e90 325i, 05 325Ci (RIP)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Exactly. The width of the tire alone creates more resistance since the contact patch is so much larger.
Another major factor is the chemical compounds in the rubber. "Eco" tires may sound like their production might have a smaller carbon footprint or something, but they're called that because their rolling resistance is reduced because of the chemicals in the tire. Porsche and BFG engineered a sort of eco tire that still grips like hell for that new hybrid 918 or whatever it's called. I'm curious to see what a set would run for.
__________________
-Michael
Active Autowerke Stage II | MMW CSv2 Exhaust | MMW Catless Headers | BC Racing BR Extreme Low Coilovers | custom adjustable rear suspension links | 19" Hyperblack CSL's | M3 style front | trim wrapped in brushed steel vinyl | Slightly smoked tail lights with clear reverse lights | factory xenons |
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 03:16 PM | #16 |
Banned
46
Rep 1,556
Posts |
FWIW, I recently switched out the heavy RFTs on my e91 328 for very light Conti DWs. I think the weight were around 27F, 29R for the RFTs and around 21F, 24R--getting close to 25 pounds of rotating weight as far from the hub as possible. My mpg went up by anywhere from 0.5mpg to 1.2mpg per tank. Nothing like what you are seeing. Of course mine were stock sport pack sizes...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 03:30 PM | #17 | ||||
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||||
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 06:02 PM | #18 | |
Captain
91
Rep 611
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
N51- PI - PE - ESS Tuned - SSK - CDV Delete - AFE Header - B12 - Mfactory LSD
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 06:30 PM | #19 |
Banned
46
Rep 1,556
Posts |
Couldn't have been happier after the switch. Better ride, less noise, less tramlining, better acceleration, better fuel economy and better looks all at less than half the cost of a new set of runflats. The only compromise, if you will, is a slight reduction in turn-in response. The rock-hard RFTs seemed to act like a big 20" wheel almost--no sidewall flex at all. The 17" sport pack tires have a beefy sidewall that would flex ever so slightly during aggressive turn-in. More than worth it all in the end. I noticed the upsides 99.9% of the time and experienced the downside for the remaining 0.1% of my time in the car.
I got the Continental ExtremeContact DW, an ultra high performance summer tire. Sized 225/45R17 front and 255/40R17 rear. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 06:39 PM | #20 |
ALL RIGHTY THEN
222
Rep 2,957
Posts |
hah, my bad man. but yeah, if you've got a greater contact patch, more mass, more rolling resistance, mpg will go down.
__________________
BMW CCA Member 483866
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2012, 07:01 PM | #22 |
Colonel
205
Rep 2,770
Posts
Drives: E92 328i, E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Alignment is at stock specs, the tire wear is totally even after 10 months. I think it's just the 328's lack of torque and the big ass tires.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|